Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
All of sales will report to him by years end. We need someone like him that can drive sales, see the market and lead for a change.
Who is RP? Stop all the riddles already.....................
All of sales will report to him by years end. We need someone like him that can drive sales, see the market and lead for a change.
I totally agree with post 160, he is the MANNNN, he knows how to drive lab sales and get the sales force all pumped up and motivated. His history in lab is epic; look at what he did to Dianon he had them rocking then was promoted to USLABS and took them to places they never were able to achieve. He is the best there every is, was and will be.
The inference is there moron. If you take the whole post and actually read it.Wrongly accusing who, someone by the name of Jim. I bet there are 5000 people in the LC employee directory by that name. Your law degree for the University of Phoenix is very impressive.
The inference is there moron. If you take the whole post and actually read it.
All of sales will report to him by years end. We need someone like him that can drive sales, see the market and lead for a change.
Defamation of character, libel?? Can not be "inferred"
in a court of law. And jackass I did read the post maybe I even wrote it.....
All of sales will report to him by years end. We need someone like him that can drive sales, see the market and lead for a change.
Calling you a moron is nothing but insulting the word "moron" itself.
Anyway, defamation against one unidentified member of a general group or category of people is not slanderous or libelous. A false accusation that an otherwise unidentified student at the state university cheated on final exams is not slanderous or libelous because the student remains unidentifiable. The question becomes more difficult if the message offers more identifiable information. A false accusation that a red-haired female business major who lives on the second floor of her sorority house and drives a black sports car cheated on a final exam in her accounting class could be slanderous or libelous if the female business major could show that others identified her as the subject of the defamation.
There is more than enough information in that post for the person named to ID him as the subject of the defamation.
So you're comment is erroneous. Stick to selling lab tests will ya!!!
Oh please this nonsense is so ridiculous. Ummm, there are what 3 BDE's in the whole company, Ummm, this person closed an account to USL 10 years ago. I am certain if this was Jim it would be less obvious?
Jim did you write this post on cafe pharma????
Give me a friggin break.
Oh please this nonsense is so ridiculous. Ummm, there are what 3 BDE's in the whole company, Ummm, this person closed an account to USL 10 years ago. I am certain if this was Jim it would be less obvious?
Jim did you write this post on cafe pharma????
Give me a friggin break.
Just tell me who you think it is if not the gentleman listed here? Thanks for confirming our thoughts. Must be very uncomfortable for him right now.
You're a simpleton. The only reason that GG was in charge of the sales force was that Labcorp offered that control as part of the overall deal cut with GG's parent company. Quests monetary deal was comparable to Labcorp's so control of sales was one of the deciding factors. And yes, I know this first hand from a reputable source. Why else would you want to dismantle a battle tested AP sales force (who had a solid year in 2010) that thrived under the rule of LabCorp and the obstacles that hinder the sales process. Why is it that TW only lasted 6 months? He didn't have what it takes to survive and thrive in this challenging environment. Why has MM been so holed up in his office in MA and missing in action? He's addressed us as sales team exactly ONE TIME since Tahoe. He's planning on jumping to the repro side so he has more time to plan his departure as the oncology business sinks. And he will depart. How many times has he told us that he's been through "these types of deals"? Do you honestly think he'll stay put for any length of time?
And why is APC from Long Island jumping to the repro sales side? Could it be that she LOST a $70,000 per month oncology office and his running for the hills? Of course "it's not her fault". She'll end up getting paid on it and then leave the problem to the newly hired Sales Director to deal with. Why has EP lost a legacy USL client in Westchester County NY? Because the pathologist (and economic buyer) stated that he didn't even know she existed. I personally took this account away from IMPATH years ago and the pathologist she failed to call on was extremely loyal. In less than a year they are history. And she has the audacity to blame the internal pathologists for lack of follow up!!!!
These are just two examples (and there are more) in which I have first hand knowledge of where the ineptitudes demonstrated were blatant and appaling. These are just two examples sub-par salesmenship that plagues your so-called stellar GG sales force. There are a myriad of others I've heard about second hand.
So take that haughtly GG attitude and %)&#)%&^#@.
Any sales direction, decline or increase, in the Midwest ? If so, who is responsible ? Any players good to keep or must go ?
funny stuff. "Integrated" is really coming together.
Calling you a moron is nothing but insulting the word "moron" itself.
Anyway, defamation against one unidentified member of a general group or category of people is not slanderous or libelous. A false accusation that an otherwise unidentified student at the state university cheated on final exams is not slanderous or libelous because the student remains unidentifiable. The question becomes more difficult if the message offers more identifiable information. A false accusation that a red-haired female business major who lives on the second floor of her sorority house and drives a black sports car cheated on a final exam in her accounting class could be slanderous or libelous if the female business major could show that others identified her as the subject of the defamation.
There is more than enough information in that post for the person named to ID him as the subject of the defamation.
So you're comment is erroneous. Stick to selling lab tests will ya!!!
Again, it goes round and round. When negatives post things about their fellow employees there is always a "lawyer' in the bunch who thinks they know it all. Haters are just that, insignificant and forgettable. And feeling like a big shot when you post "anonymously" on here will only get you exposed. Stay off of cafe pharma and go sell something.