FLORIDA EMPLOYEE'S TESTIFYING IN A FEDERAL CASE-THIS IS FOR YOU!

Quote












Anonymous said:
Actually, the state prosecutors office agreed to take this case two weeks ago. Word on the street is that there is overwhelming evidence from multiple sources which show it was these two employee's. The one employee better figure out that she has one way out only, which is to turn on the other.....or be faced with losing her job and quite possibly being prosecuted along with the other party.
Click to expand...

Yes, Prosecutors for the State of FL will be moving forward with this, with the assistance of the Feds. This case will move faster through State Courts rather than Federal Court and that is what Prosecutors are looking for.
There is overwhelming evidence in the case and if it does "go to trial", which is unlikely, the guilty persons will be found guilty when jurors hear the overwhelming eveidence. Forensic evidence, such as handwriting and fiber traces are hard to ignore.
Can't believe the idiots sent a handwritten letter....but then again, look at the mentality of the person who sent it.
And we all know who that is.
 












I am sure you do hate these post TG, after all its very difficult to know that your about to lose your job and possibly face charges because you have attempted to cause this very issue for several people who dont deserve it. Your downfall with this was you shared it with someone else, and they have opened their mouth.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had verbally expressed their intent to retaliate
against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was an individual who is
currently employed by Defendant.

k. The package was sent from The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland Park
Boulevard, Sunrise, Florida, on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were in the vicinity of The UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. The author of the forged letter, and any employees involved in sending the
package to ____, were acting as agents of and for the benefit of Defendant. Each of
them intended to jeopardize Plaintiff’s employment, to destroy Plaintiff’s
career and reputation in her professional community, and to prevent Plaintiff from
competing with Defendant, in retaliation for Plaintiff’s complaints of sexual
discrimination and retaliation by Defendant.

n. Defendant’s conduct constitutes a further violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act, in that it was done in retaliation for Plaintiff’s having opposed discrimination
and retaliation based on sex.
 
























I am sure you do hate these post TG, after all its very difficult to know that your about to lose your job and possibly face charges because you have attempted to cause this very issue for several people who dont deserve it. Your downfall with this was you shared it with someone else, and they have opened their mouth.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had verbally expressed their intent to have a party for the Plaintiff because she is so special to them.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author is not, nor ever was an individual employed by Defendant.

k. The package was sent from The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland Park
Boulevard, Butte, Montana, on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were not in the vicinity of The UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. The author of the forged letter, and any employees involved in sending the
package to ____, were not acting as agents of and for the benefit of Defendant. Each of
them intended to jeopardize Plaintiff’s employment, to destroy Plaintiff’s
career and reputation in her professional community, and to prevent Plaintiff from
competing with Defendant, in retaliation for Plaintiff’s complaints of sexual
discrimination and retaliation by Defendant.

n. Defendant’s conduct has been found to be acceptable by the Florida Civil
Rights Act, in that it was not done in retaliation for Plaintiff’s having opposed discrimination
and retaliation based on sex.
 






Looks as though EP is once again monitoring these boards on behalf of LCA. Are you billing for the hours you spend posting this nonsense?
Spend your time doing an actual investigation vs. lying to defend a guilty client.
You have an insider leaking out who this is
 












Looks like more criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime and these employees could face prison time.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had verbally expressed their intent to retaliate
against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was an individual who is
currently employed by Defendant.

k. The package was sent from The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland Park
Boulevard, Sunrise, Florida, on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were in the vicinity of The UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. The author of the forged letter, and any employees involved in sending the
package to ____, were acting as agents of and for the benefit of Defendant. Each of
them intended to jeopardize Plaintiff’s employment, to destroy Plaintiff’s
career and reputation in her professional community, and to prevent Plaintiff from
competing with Defendant, in retaliation for Plaintiff’s complaints of sexual
discrimination and retaliation by Defendant.

n. Defendant’s conduct constitutes a further violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act, in that it was done in retaliation for Plaintiff’s having opposed discrimination
and retaliation based on sex.
 






There are no criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime but Labcorp employees have been cleared of these and all charges.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had never verbally expressed their intent to retaliate against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was not an employee of the Defendant.

k. The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland ParkBoulevard, Sunrise, Florida, has been close for the past two years so no package could have been sent from threr on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were never in the vicinity of The closed UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. There was no forged letter, therefore no employees could have been involved in sending any package to.

n. Defendant’s conduct does not constitute any violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act.
 






Looks like more criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime and these employees could face prison time.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had verbally expressed their intent to retaliate
against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was an individual who is
currently employed by Defendant.

k. The package was sent from The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland Park
Boulevard, Sunrise, Florida, on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were in the vicinity of The UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. The author of the forged letter, and any employees involved in sending the
package to ____, were acting as agents of and for the benefit of Defendant. Each of
them intended to jeopardize Plaintiff’s employment, to destroy Plaintiff’s
career and reputation in her professional community, and to prevent Plaintiff from
competing with Defendant, in retaliation for Plaintiff’s complaints of sexual
discrimination and retaliation by Defendant.

n. Defendant’s conduct constitutes a further violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act, in that it was done in retaliation for Plaintiff’s having opposed discrimination
and retaliation based on sex.
 






There are no criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime but Labcorp employees have been cleared of these and all charges.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had never verbally expressed their intent to retaliate against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was not an employee of the Defendant.

k. The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland ParkBoulevard, Sunrise, Florida, has been closed for the past two years so no package could have been sent from there on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were never in the vicinity of The closed UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. There was no forged letter, therefore no employees could have been involved in sending any package to.

n. Defendant’s conduct does not constitute any violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act.

o. Defendant plans to sue those that are posting lies here and elsewhere. We know who they are but will provide them with a little more rope to hang themselves. Your pockets are not deep enough to pay a lawyer to defend you. Whatever little you have will belong to LabCorp.
 






Looks like more criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime and these employees could face prison time.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had verbally expressed their intent to retaliate
against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was an individual who is
currently employed by Defendant.

k. The package was sent from The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland Park
Boulevard, Sunrise, Florida, on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were in the vicinity of The UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. The author of the forged letter, and any employees involved in sending the
package to ____, were acting as agents of and for the benefit of Defendant. Each of
them intended to jeopardize Plaintiff’s employment, to destroy Plaintiff’s
career and reputation in her professional community, and to prevent Plaintiff from
competing with Defendant, in retaliation for Plaintiff’s complaints of sexual
discrimination and retaliation by Defendant.

n. Defendant’s conduct constitutes a further violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act, in that it was done in retaliation for Plaintiff’s having opposed discrimination
and retaliation based on sex.
 






There are no criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime but Labcorp employees have been cleared of these and all charges.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had never verbally expressed their intent to retaliate against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was not an employee of the Defendant.

k. The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland ParkBoulevard, Sunrise, Florida, has been closed for the past two years so no package could have been sent from there on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were never in the vicinity of The closed UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. There was no forged letter, therefore no employees could have been involved in sending any package to.

n. Defendant’s conduct does not constitute any violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act.

o. Defendant plans to sue those that are posting lies here and elsewhere. We know who they are but will provide them with a little more rope to hang themselves. Your pockets are not deep enough to pay a lawyer to defend you. Whatever little you have will belong to LabCorp.

your turn
 






Anonymous said:
There are no criminals in the Florida division. Mail fraud is a serious crime but Labcorp employees have been cleared of these and all charges.

On Pacer in the KB case:
Plaintiff learned from a former coworker and employee of Defendant that
certain individuals at Defendant company had never verbally expressed their intent to retaliate against Plaintiff and to cause her to be terminated from her new job.

j. A forensic document examiner has analyzed the handwritten letter along
with known samples of handwriting, and opined that the author was not an employee of the Defendant.

k. The UPS Store at 11110 West Oakland ParkBoulevard, Sunrise, Florida, has been closed for the past two years so no package could have been sent from there on May 3, 2010.

l. Plaintiff expects the evidence to show that two employees of Defendant
were never in the vicinity of The closed UPS Store identified above at the time the package was sent.

m. There was no forged letter, therefore no employees could have been involved in sending any package to.

n. Defendant’s conduct does not constitute any violation of the Florida Civil
Rights Act.

o. Defendant plans to sue those that are posting lies here and elsewhere. We know who they are but will provide them with a little more rope to hang themselves. Your pockets are not deep enough to pay a lawyer to defend you. Whatever little you have will belong to LabCorp.
Click to expand...



Thanks to the "rearranger". While it must be boring to have this assignment from HR or the Law Dept, you are none the less adding to the view and post count. Great work.
 






This assignment has been given to the law firm who now handles the employment cases for LCA. They come on this board and post BS with the hopes of drawing attention elsewhere. Thet are very predictable.
 






It is clear after reading all the posts that the law firms associated with the LC employment cases (PD, GR, & PP) are milking LC for all the money that they can get...

Making stuff up and thinking that they will never be in court to answer for their BS shows their arrogance.

Just look at Pacer Doc # 327 in the MB case... I love the way PD/LC was exposed for their "Misstatements of Fact" and "Misstatements of Law" - what a work of art!!!
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote