The New Reality of (what's left of) Merck Employees

[anonymous]

It's almost impossible to prove. In most cases there is no merit. Naturally HR never send out people to target and dig up dirt. It's called a discovery process. Maybe the victim has a drinking problem, angry that a relationship did not go well, was the aggressor, maybe nothing happened. You do understand insurance pays out, not the company. Also even if the company did pay out, that would cause others to be terminated. Don't you care about your fellow workers? It seems by reporting questionable behavior that may or may not has happened is wrong. It makes you look greedy and selfish. You should search inside yourself and look at all the damage you are causing innocent people.

They go though the courts and nothing becomes of them. Corporate America has the great lawyers. You get the ambulance chasers. It better to get over what you have done and move on. You will sleep better at night.

It's almost impossible to prove. In most cases, there is no merit. Naturally, HR never (remove) sends out people to target and dig up dirt regarding those who prosecute. It's called a discovery process. Maybe the victim has a drinking problem, This is very subjective at best. angry that a relationship did not go well, was the aggressor, maybe nothing happened. You do understand that insurance pays damages and not the company. Also, even if the company did pay damages, that would cause others to be terminated. Seriously, This can go both ways regarding ruining lives. Don't you care about your fellow workers? Why doesn't the perpetrator care about acting appropriately and showing respect? This goes back to the deep level personality assessments that are administered by the company to insure that the narcissist or sociopath is hired as the more preferable job candidate. It seems by reporting questionable behavior that may or may not have happened is wrong. It makes you look greedy and selfish. This is an interesting statement for sure. Isn't this how the culprit would appear to the possible victim and those onlookers who are complicit? You should search inside yourself and look at all the damage you are causing "innocent" people. If there is ever any question of this, we certainly would have to consider differing view points.

They go though the courts and nothing becomes of the cases brought forward. Don't you mean that the cases that are settled are done so out of court, so that the media doesn't catch too much wind of what is happening? Corporate America has the great lawyers. You get the ambulance chasers. Now we have too much evidence from precedent cases where there have been both compensatory and punitive damages paid, so we have to wonder if your're using just another bullying tactic to accomplish your resolve.. It's better to get over what you have done and move on. You didn't just end the sentence with a preposition, did you? Yet again, another deterrent and bullying tactic. You will sleep better at night. You won't sleep at all or forgive yourself if you just "let it go"; but then again we will have to consider how badly you've been beaten down.

Corrections-Red Bold
Comments-Green

 

[anonymous]

Indeed, looks like the mind of a child at work. Definitely unemployed and very
lonely and confused with poor upbringing and lack of education.

 

[anonymous]

It's almost impossible to prove. In most cases, there is no merit. Naturally, HR never (remove) sends out people to target and dig up dirt regarding those who prosecute. It's called a discovery process. Maybe the victim has a drinking problem, This is very subjective at best. angry that a relationship did not go well, was the aggressor, maybe nothing happened. You do understand that insurance pays damages and not the company. Also, even if the company did pay damages, that would cause others to be terminated. Seriously, This can go both ways regarding ruining lives. Don't you care about your fellow workers? Why doesn't the perpetrator care about acting appropriately and showing respect? This goes back to the deep level personality assessments that are administered by the company to insure that the narcissist or sociopath is hired as the more preferable job candidate. It seems by reporting questionable behavior that may or may not have happened is wrong. It makes you look greedy and selfish. This is an interesting statement for sure. Isn't this how the culprit would appear to the possible victim and those onlookers who are complicit? You should search inside yourself and look at all the damage you are causing "innocent" people. If there is ever any question of this, we certainly would have to consider differing view points.

They go though the courts and nothing becomes of the cases brought forward. Don't you mean that the cases that are settled are done so out of court, so that the media doesn't catch too much wind of what is happening? Corporate America has the great lawyers. You get the ambulance chasers. Now we have too much evidence from precedent cases where there have been both compensatory and punitive damages paid, so we have to wonder if your're using just another bullying tactic to accomplish your resolve.. It's better to get over what you have done and move on. You didn't just end the sentence with a preposition, did you? Yet again, another deterrent and bullying tactic. You will sleep better at night. You won't sleep at all or forgive yourself if you just "let it go"; but then again we will have to consider how badly you've been beaten down.

Corrections-Red Bold
Comments-Green

Signed
Fired Man Child

 

[anonymous]

It's almost impossible to prove. In most cases, there is no merit. Naturally, HR never (remove) sends out people to target and dig up dirt regarding those who prosecute. It's called a discovery process. Maybe the victim has a drinking problem, This is very subjective at best. angry that a relationship did not go well, was the aggressor, maybe nothing happened. You do understand that insurance pays damages and not the company. Also, even if the company did pay damages, that would cause others to be terminated. Seriously, This can go both ways regarding ruining lives. Don't you care about your fellow workers? Why doesn't the perpetrator care about acting appropriately and showing respect? This goes back to the deep level personality assessments that are administered by the company to insure that the narcissist or sociopath is hired as the more preferable job candidate. It seems by reporting questionable behavior that may or may not have happened is wrong. It makes you look greedy and selfish. This is an interesting statement for sure. Isn't this how the culprit would appear to the possible victim and those onlookers who are complicit? You should search inside yourself and look at all the damage you are causing "innocent" people. If there is ever any question of this, we certainly would have to consider differing view points.

They go though the courts and nothing becomes of the cases brought forward. Don't you mean that the cases that are settled are done so out of court, so that the media doesn't catch too much wind of what is happening? Corporate America has the great lawyers. You get the ambulance chasers. Now we have too much evidence from precedent cases where there have been both compensatory and punitive damages paid, so we have to wonder if your're using just another bullying tactic to accomplish your resolve.. It's better to get over what you have done and move on. You didn't just end the sentence with a preposition, did you? Yet again, another deterrent and bullying tactic. You will sleep better at night. You won't sleep at all or forgive yourself if you just "let it go"; but then again we will have to consider how badly you've been beaten down.

Corrections-Red Bold
Comments-Green

What is your height and weight?

 

[anonymous]

Indeed, looks like the mind of a child at work. Definitely unemployed and very
lonely and confused with poor upbringing and lack of education.

Is that the best you got or Is that how you explain the fact that you are hardly literate?...Hmmmm...ok!
It honestly looks as though you just had your ass handed to you.

 

[anonymous]

What is your height and weight?

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Is this considered harassment?

 

[anonymous]

If you have multiple personalities and reply and harass yourself, you'll have to pay two different attorneys...right?

 

[anonymous]

The OP confirmed every suspicion I've had. Thank you.

 

[anonymous]

The OP confirmed every suspicion I've had. Thank you.

Is one of them that you eat way to much? The other is you're an idiot?
If so you are correct.

 

[anonymous]

Is one of them that you eat way to much? The other is you're an idiot?
If so you are correct.

Your "to" should be spelled "too". "If so" should have been followed with a comma. You write three horribly conceived and even more horribly written sentences and you manage two glaring mistakes in simple grammar.

And you call the other poster an idiot? Check out the mirror, Genius.

(The other poster is correct, by the way, along with the OP)

 

[anonymous]

Your "to" should be spelled "too". "If so" should have been followed with a comma. You write three horribly conceived and even more horribly written sentences and you manage two glaring mistakes in simple grammar.

And you call the other poster an idiot? Check out the mirror, Genius.

(The other poster is correct, by the way, along with the OP)

Merry Christmas

 

[anonymous]

Your "to" should be spelled "too". "If so" should have been followed with a comma. You write three horribly conceived and even more horribly written sentences and you manage two glaring mistakes in simple grammar.

And you call the other poster an idiot? Check out the mirror, Genius.

(The other poster is correct, by the way, along with the OP)

Checking spelling and grammar at 1:35 AM. WINNER. You poor pathetic fool.

 

[anonymous]

Your "to" should be spelled "too". "If so" should have been followed with a comma. You write three horribly conceived and even more horribly written sentences and you manage two glaring mistakes in simple grammar.

And you call the other poster an idiot? Check out the mirror, Genius.

(The other poster is correct, by the way, along with the OP)

 

[anonymous]

Robotic Girl Scout leader managing, greedy, lieing and corrupt upper management (integrity criminals), age discrimination ( “We need millennials. We’re too old of a sales force”), misleading sales tactics, faking calls in fear of losing your job, capped fecal salaries, corporate nepotism, miserable new product forecasting(blame it on the reps). It’s all part of the pharma cess pool and Smerck floats in it !

 

[anonymous]

What a company, huh?

 

[anonymous]

Checking spelling and grammar at 1:35 AM. WINNER. You poor pathetic fool.

I made more trading options and FOREX last month than you earned last year. Those of us with high-level accounts do most of our trading at night. I realize that you're still a Merck employee, which says something about you (namely, that you aren't very bright and that you make very little money). Hence, I don't expect you to understand.

Also, you should have separated the adjectives "poor" and "pathetic" with a comma. Neither adjective is accurate, by the way.

 

[anonymous]

I made more trading options and FOREX last month than you earned last year. Those of us with high-level accounts do most of our trading at night. I realize that you're still a Merck employee, which says something about you (namely, that you aren't very bright and that you make very little money). Hence, I don't expect you to understand.

Also, you should have separated the adjectives "poor" and "pathetic" with a comma. Neither adjective is accurate, by the way.

Nice.

 

[anonymous]

I made more trading options and FOREX last month than you earned last year. Those of us with high-level accounts do most of our trading at night. I realize that you're still a Merck employee, which says something about you (namely, that you aren't very bright and that you make very little money). Hence, I don't expect you to understand.

Also, you should have separated the adjectives "poor" and "pathetic" with a comma. Neither adjective is accurate, by the way.

"poor" and "pathetic" are very accurate. Your life has to suck. You check spelling in the middle of the night. You respond 3 minutes after a post. That is the definition of poor and pathetic. You have to be miserable. I guess hubby does not get you wet and you let yourself go.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Sucks to be you.

 

[anonymous]

I made more trading options and FOREX last month than you earned last year. Those of us with high-level accounts do most of our trading at night. I realize that you're still a Merck employee, which says something about you (namely, that you aren't very bright and that you make very little money). Hence, I don't expect you to understand.

Also, you should have separated the adjectives "poor" and "pathetic" with a comma. Neither adjective is accurate, by the way.

You’re full of monkey shit. I know one of the experts in FOREX and he’s making a living, but certainly not the money you’re lying about. High-level accounts? Hahahahahaha! YOU are the pathetic loser, you know it, we know it. You’re making so much money at night, that’s why you’re on CP?.... Hahahahahaha! you are a joke. You should be a guest on Colbert, then the two biggest losers can be in one place.

 

[anonymous]

You’re full of monkey shit. I know one of the experts in FOREX and he’s making a living, but certainly not the money you’re lying about. High-level accounts? Hahahahahaha! YOU are the pathetic loser, you know it, we know it. You’re making so much money at night, that’s why you’re on CP?.... Hahahahahaha! you are a joke. You should be a guest on Colbert, then the two biggest losers can be in one place.

Actually, the are multiple levels of trading accounts. The brokerage houses have to clear individual investors for trading different kinds of options and the requirements get more and more stringent as you move up the risk ladder for options and certainly for FOREX. In other words, I'd bet she's right.