Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
I think you are sorely missing the point. Its not about a job that pays for raising kids and shuttling them to and from school...Its about this job, this PTS-Merck contract job. Its part time, flex time or whatever hell else you want to call it...a huge majority of the people who work on this are parents with kids that still need to be given such care. Why the hell else do you think it's part time??? I don't know of any young, single, no kids, fresh-out-of-college people on this contract. Do you?!? And frankly, at the Core Meta launch back in 2010, it was made very clear, that this would be a unique working arrangment in the sense that it enabled an unprecedented balance of work-family life approach. 24 hours a week...3 days...and even in those 3 days, there was room for flexibility. Note: within those 3 working days of each week, it was stated that there was room for flexibility. So now...having said this all, where does your bullshit statements quoted above fit in???
Yes. They don't even want to hire people that are single, no kids, because quess what? They don't want flex time. They couldn't live off our salary. This is a second income job for the vast majority of us. Usually the spouse has a higher paying job. This job was supposed to work around our families, not vice versa. That is how they sold the job to us. Most of us are seasoned reps with a lot of experience. They don't have to pay us car, bennies, vacation, sick time, or holiday pay. If they choose to lay us off we don't get severance. Sounds like a pretty good deal for PTS/Merck. We do the same job as our merck counterparts who have all of the bennies and big salary.