Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Are you comparing yourself to an ant?
No? And where did you get that from?
Are you comparing yourself to an ant?
We all know that MBs to lawsuit is baseless.
And she will lose just like BB did.
When MB loses her lawsuit, the company hero will be TF in Tampa. Then that means the TN in Orlando will should at least get the Silver Medal as the company hero runner up.
We can't wait !!!!
Thread hijacker and sunshine pumper.
I heard a rumor that a previous rep KB in Florida sued them while she was working for them. Now she is no longer working for them. Did she quit or get riffed? Considering launching a law suit against them myself and didn't know if I should do this while still working for them. Anyone have any knowledge or thoughts on this?
Also, anyone having any problems with being placed on PIP even though your numbers are better than others who aren't?
Buddy, the only people on this thread is you and me.
Actually I mostly lurk and rarely post. However, the tit for tat postings are tiring. Obviously there is a person(s) with an axe to grind. I can tell you from personal observation this is not without cause.
Another individual (you?) plays with the wording to create a distraction. I would like to see the thread back on track of updates on the legal procedings.
Actually I mostly lurk and rarely post. However, the tit for tat postings are tiring. Obviously there is a person(s) with an axe to grind. I can tell you from personal observation this is not without cause.
Another individual (you?) plays with the wording to create a distraction. I would like to see the thread back on track of updates on the legal procedings.
Ok, here it is, back on track:
Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.
The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.
1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........
"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"
In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.
Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.
The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.
So now you know the truth.
Ok, here it is, back on track:
Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.
The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.
1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........
"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"
In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.
Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.
The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.
So now you know the truth.