Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.
The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.
1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........
"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"
In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.
Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.
The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.
So now you know the truth.
The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.
1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........
"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"
In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.
Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.
The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.
So now you know the truth.