FLORIDA EMPLOYEE'S TESTIFYING IN A FEDERAL CASE-THIS IS FOR YOU!

Quote
Cutt and Pasted straight from pacer for those employee's who think that this post is simply about angry x-employee's.

Perhaps the judge below has had her blood drawn at one of LCA stations? Or perhaps she was incorrectly billed and harrassed by LCA? That will be your next conclusion.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, later explained that she failed to mention the
administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.41, Ex. 2.) A reasonable jury could choose to disregard this explanation since an e-mail shows that KS sought approval for the new position two weeks earlier. (Doc. 41, Ex. 3.)........

"PERJURY AT IT'S BEST?"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire good looking and "young female talent"
Lab Corp. argues that TF'S comments about “good talent” only referred to the
physical attractiveness—not the age—of prospective employees. However, other employee's testified that TF referred to both looks and age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer both to looks and age. In any event, determinations about a witness’s arguably inconsistent statements are questions of credibility that should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire young talent” and also praised him for hiring good-looking women. Also testified that TF said he preferred that Managment not hire anyone close to retirement age.

While TF did not make these remarks specifically about BB, a jury could
reasonably find that the comments showed Farrell’s intent in making hiring and firing decisions,and could prove discriminatory intent
 






Anonymous said:
Anything that you report to Florida HR will be kept confidential. Anything reported to corporate HR will also be kept confidential. However if you continue to call and harrass HR about false and unsubstantiated claims you can open yourself for disiplinary action. You can always contact the compliance line with real concerns or report any issue to Corporate legal. However do not waste someones time because you have an ax to grind with LabCorp. If you hate working for the company that much just leave.
However we have found that the vast majority of those publically complaining about the company (example:these boards) no longer work for the company. Most have been terminated with grounds and can't even collect unemployment. Do not let a few discontented former employees try to influence you. Next time they post lies ask them for their name. You won't get it.
Click to expand...

First off, if you can't take the heat, get out. Most corporations have no use for lazy Human Resource professionals who couldn't complete a detailed investigation, much less an interrogatory. PHR and SPHR designations are handed out like candy; the exam that is taken to achieve that designation is a mockery of our academic system. If you haven't kept up with the times, perhaps you should go back to school and actually get an education.

As for whether information is kept confidential, I'll find that out for myself when I get access to all company e-mails through discovery. We'll see just how confidential your organization keeps information. For now, I'll trust the government. More on that later.

Since I know most of you in Florida HR, you're all old enough to remember when Human Resources used to be called "Personnel"? Do your job. You are supposed to be the STRATEGIC partner for the company and employees - bridging the gap between management and the company's labor resources. Even your employee manual states that HR is supposed to be a "neutral third-party" under the Open Communications policy, Step 3. But, I wouldn't expect you to grasp that concept. Even SHRM admits that the idea of Human Resources is progressive in nature, but the practitioners are 15 years behind the times. Step aside and let those who can understand and implement proven strategies in Labors Relations take the helm. I also don't like how all of your Florida HR leaders are Caucasian (with the glaring exception of JB, who is Asian) while your assistants are minorities. Hmm. Diversity --- right.

You're a disgrace to this profession and a stain on its reputation. KS's outright deception and suspect statements under a sworn deposition are unconscionable. I don't hold a much higher opinion of her subordinate JW either. Stand up for your principles.

I'm glad I left - I make more money and I don't have to report to someone who didn't graduate from High School. For that, Labcorp, you have my thanks.

Since we are questioning the creditability of HR, I'd like to mention a good quote that has always stuck with me. It's from a Star Trek Voyager Episode "Counterpoint".

"Captain, do you trust me?"

"Not for a second."

"Exactly. And why should you? Trust has to be earned, it is gradual. And yet it is the foundation of every relationship, professional and personal."

Take from that what you will.
 






Anything that you report to Florida HR will be kept confidential. Anything reported to corporate HR will also be kept confidential. However if you continue to call and harrass HR about false and unsubstantiated claims you can open yourself for disiplinary action. You can always contact the compliance line with real concerns or report any issue to Corporate legal. However do not waste someones time because you have an ax to grind with LabCorp. If you hate working for the company that much just leave.
However we have found that the vast majority of those publically complaining about the company (example:these boards) no longer work for the company. Most have been terminated with grounds and can't even collect unemployment. Do not let a few discontented former employees try to influence you. Next time they post lies ask them for their name. You won't get it.
 






The poster who keeps posting lies about LCA was more than likely directed so by Quest. You must understand that Quest needs to cover up of all their bad acts. Now that the US Government is looking into Quest for making these false allegations, they are trying to ensure there is as little "media" attention to them as possible. Someone is simply trying to protect his job. Watch, when this post is reviewed, there will be a bunch of BS to try and avoid additional exposure.

CNN headlines to read: LabCorp wins again!!!!!
 






One thing that LabCorp CEO Dk boasted about is that LabCorp has been named one of the top companies by the US Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program. According to posts in CafePharma.com, employees are honored to work for LabCorp’s especially in Florida. They have been giving employees bonuses that are rumored to have been about $2.7 Million last year. And that does not reflect sales reps. In addition, they have won Division of the year for the last 5 years..... way to go!!! Even employees like MB who have been hit with allegations of witness tampering and obstruction of justice have received substantial bonues. LabCorp has had to hire a law firm to help distribute the money. The posts include the following:

OFCCP would like to hear from those who wish to appear on Good Morning America to talk about what a great company LabCorp is. A formal recommendation to the show will be made. Those who wish to appear on National TV, write:

US Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program
James Powell Building
15 Main Street
Room 102
Burlington, NC 32202

or call:

(904) 351-5000
 






Cutt and Pasted straight from pacer for those employee's who think that this post is simply about angry x-employee's.

Perhaps the judge below has had her blood drawn at one of LCA stations? Or perhaps she was incorrectly billed and harrassed by LCA? That will be your next conclusion.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, later explained that she failed to mention the
administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.41, Ex. 2.) A reasonable jury could choose to disregard this explanation since an e-mail shows that KS sought approval for the new position two weeks earlier. (Doc. 41, Ex. 3.)........

"PERJURY AT IT'S BEST?"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire good looking and "young female talent"
Lab Corp. argues that TF'S comments about “good talent” only referred to the
physical attractiveness—not the age—of prospective employees. However, other employee's testified that TF referred to both looks and age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer both to looks and age. In any event, determinations about a witness’s arguably inconsistent statements are questions of credibility that should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire young talent” and also praised him for hiring good-looking women. Also testified that TF said he preferred that Managment not hire anyone close to retirement age.

While TF did not make these remarks specifically about BB, a jury could
reasonably find that the comments showed Farrell’s intent in making hiring and firing decisions,and could prove discriminatory intent
 






One thing that LabCorp CEO Dk boasted about is that LabCorp has been named one of the top companies by the US Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program. According to posts in CafePharma.com, employees are honored to work for LabCorp’s especially in Florida. They have been giving employees bonuses that are rumored to have been about $2.7 Million last year. And that does not reflect sales reps. In addition, they have won Division of the year for the last 5 years..... way to go!!! Even employees like MB who have been hit with allegations of witness tampering and obstruction of justice have received substantial bonues. LabCorp has had to hire a law firm to help distribute the money. The posts include the following:

OFCCP would like to hear from those who wish to appear on Good Morning America to talk about what a great company LabCorp is. A formal recommendation to the show will be made. Those who wish to appear on National TV, write:

US Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program
James Powell Building
15 Main Street
Room 102
Burlington, NC 32202

or call:

(904) 351-5000
 






Anything that you report to Florida HR will be kept confidential. Anything reported to corporate HR will also be kept confidential. However if you continue to call and harrass HR about false and unsubstantiated claims you can open yourself for disiplinary action. You can always contact the compliance line with real concerns or report any issue to Corporate legal. However do not waste someones time because you have an ax to grind with LabCorp. If you hate working for the company that much just leave.
However we have found that the vast majority of those publically complaining about the company (example:these boards) no longer work for the company. Most have been terminated with grounds and can't even collect unemployment. Do not let a few discontented former employees try to influence you. Next time they post lies ask them for their name. You won't get it.
 






The poster who keeps posting lies about LCA was more than likely directed so by Quest. You must understand that Quest needs to cover up of all their bad acts. Now that the US Government is looking into Quest for making these false allegations, they are trying to ensure there is as little "media" attention to them as possible. Someone is simply trying to protect his job. Watch, when this post is reviewed, there will be a bunch of BS to try and avoid additional exposure.

CNN headlines to read: LabCorp wins again!!!!!
 






Anonymous said:
Anything that you report to Florida HR will be kept confidential. Anything reported to corporate HR will also be kept confidential. However if you continue to call and harrass HR about false and unsubstantiated claims you can open yourself for disiplinary action. You can always contact the compliance line with real concerns or report any issue to Corporate legal. However do not waste someones time because you have an ax to grind with LabCorp. If you hate working for the company that much just leave.
However we have found that the vast majority of those publically complaining about the company (example:these boards) no longer work for the company. Most have been terminated with grounds and can't even collect unemployment. Do not let a few discontented former employees try to influence you. Next time they post lies ask them for their name. You won't get it.
Click to expand...

If you are going to make a statement, at least be accurate. Unless dismissal is based on "gross" misconduct, anyone who is dismissed involuntarily is entitled to unemployment compensation in Florida. I'd like to think that you would know that if you were in HR. If you are - well - that's just sad. If you are not, you don't know any better.

I know all about the CAL and have experience with their breaches of confidentiality.


K*** Schar*******
Corporate HR
Burlington, NC


That's his signature from e-mails received. Giving the whole name would run afoul of Cafe Pharma's policy. I wanted to differentiate between this individual and our lovely person in Florida, KS - they have the same initials. Different people, though.

He's one piece of work and always answers Option 2 of the CAL. He will rat you out to your divisional HR director and when it came to Florida, he says he knows KS "personally" and "very well". Hmmm. He will solicit your name probably twice during the conversation (after you've told him you wish to remain anonymous). His accent is Northern, but nothing discernible like New York or Boston.

So...confidential? I don't think so. If you are in Florida, definitely stay clear of the CAL.
 






Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.

The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........

"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.

The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.

So now you know the truth.
 






Anonymous said:
Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.

The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........

"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.

The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.

So now you know the truth.
Click to expand...

Well, truth and facts are completely different things. Facts don't change - what is the truth is a matter or perspective.

KS was caught perjuring herself under oath and the Judge denied Labcorp's motion for Summary Judgement in BB's case. - FACT

Shortly thereafter, both parties entered into a non-disclosure agreement that was rumored to be a sizable settlement. With both parties agreeing, the case was closed. - Fact

I read TF's deposition. Hardly what I would call "strong". Atty, "So, when BB was dismissed, who would answer the phones?" TF "Uh, well, I suppose I would." Hmmm. Never, ever say I suppose. Your attorney should have done a better job of prepping you prior to the deposition.

LCA's stories have more holes than the craters on SP's face.
 






Anonymous said:
Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.

The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........

"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.

The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.

So now you know the truth.
Click to expand...

Well, as of today, BB is a very wealthy woman and Labcorp is millions poorer.

That's a fact.

So now you know the truth.
 






Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.

The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........

"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.

The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.

So now you know the truth.
 






If anyone else in Florida has any pending charges, have your attroneys look up the SJ from BB case, see below some of the information straight from the judges order. Especially if you have an age claim or "hostile work environment claim and or discrmination claim.

The reason that a poster has taken over this site and trying to eliminate the exposure is simply because they have great concern that others may actually get knowledge which may help them.

Cutt and Pasted straight from pacer for those employee's who think that this post is simply about angry x-employee's.

Perhaps the judge below has had her blood drawn at one of LCA stations? Or perhaps she was incorrectly billed and harrassed by LCA? That will be your next conclusion.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, later explained that she failed to mention the
administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.41, Ex. 2.) A reasonable jury could choose to disregard this explanation since an e-mail shows that KS sought approval for the new position two weeks earlier. (Doc. 41, Ex. 3.)........

"PERJURY AT IT'S BEST?"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire good looking and "young female talent"
Lab Corp. argues that TF'S comments about “good talent” only referred to the
physical attractiveness—not the age—of prospective employees. However, other employee's testified that TF referred to both looks and age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer both to looks and age. In any event, determinations about a witness’s arguably inconsistent statements are questions of credibility that should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire young talent” and also praised him for hiring good-looking women. Also testified that TF said he preferred that Managment not hire anyone close to retirement age.

While TF did not make these remarks specifically about BB, a jury could
reasonably find that the comments showed Farrell’s intent in making hiring and firing decisions,and could prove discriminatory intent
 






Well, as of today, BB is a very wealthy woman and Labcorp is millions poorer because BB won her discrimination lawsuit against Labcorp.

That's a fact.

So now you know the truth.
 






Cut and Pasted straight from pacer so employee's will know the truth about this malicious and false claim made by a angry x-employee.

The judge below knows her stuff and has all but vindicated LCA.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, did not mention the administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.21, Ex. 3.) A reasonable jury would have to acknowledge this to be the truth since there was no documentation to prove otherwise. (Doc. 21, Ex. 3.)........

"THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM AT IT'S BEST!!!"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire only the most qualified indiviuals regardless of gender, appearance or ethnic background. We only want the best said TF, I don't care about physical attractiveness—or the age—of prospective employees. Employee's testified that TF never referred to looks or age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer to "as the best possible candidate". In any event, determinations about a witness’s solid testimony should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire the very best” and also praised him for meeting affirmative action quotas. Also testified that TF said he wanted the best talent so that they could replace him should he get promoted.

The Judge determined that TF never made any derogatory statements about BB, and that a jury could reasonably find Farrell was intent in making the best possible decisions for Labcorp. The Judge went as far as to consider holding BB in contempt.

So now you know the truth.
 






Well, as of today, BB is going to have one heck of a attorney bill to pay. Labcorp has been vindicated and it is possible that they will go after BB for their attorney costs because BB lost her discrimination lawsuit against Labcorp.

That's a fact.

So now you know the truth.
 












ATTENTION- ANYONE CURRENTLY IN FLORIDA WITH A PENDING CLAIM

If anyone else in Florida has any pending charges, have your attroneys look up the SJ from BB case, see below some of the information straight from the judges order. Especially if you have an age claim or "hostile work environment claim and or discrmination claim.

The reason that a poster has taken over this site and trying to eliminate the exposure is simply because they have great concern that others may actually get knowledge which may help them.

Cutt and Pasted straight from pacer for those employee's who think that this post is simply about angry x-employee's.

Perhaps the judge below has had her blood drawn at one of LCA stations? Or perhaps she was incorrectly billed and harrassed by LCA? That will be your next conclusion.

1 KS, the human resource director of FL, later explained that she failed to mention the
administrative specialist position to Burke because she did not know about the position. (Doc.41, Ex. 2.) A reasonable jury could choose to disregard this explanation since an e-mail shows that KS sought approval for the new position two weeks earlier. (Doc. 41, Ex. 3.)........

"PERJURY AT IT'S BEST?"

In addition, B.B. presents evidence that T.F., vice president of sales, instructed
other managers to hire good looking and "young female talent"
Lab Corp. argues that TF'S comments about “good talent” only referred to the
physical attractiveness—not the age—of prospective employees. However, other employee's testified that TF referred to both looks and age, and that other employees interpreted the “good talent” remarks to refer both to looks and age. In any event, determinations about a witness’s arguably inconsistent statements are questions of credibility that should be left to a jury.

Former Lab Corp. Manager of Business Development testified that TF told him: “You need to hire young talent” and also praised him for hiring good-looking women. Also testified that TF said he preferred that Managment not hire anyone close to retirement age.

While TF did not make these remarks specifically about BB, a jury could
reasonably find that the comments showed Farrell’s intent in making hiring and firing decisions,and could prove discriminatory intent
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote