"Do Not Rehire" list for lawsuit

Quote






Anonymous said:
How old is the list?
Click to expand...

What list? How can you be sure you are not being played? Seriously, all of you who are concerned MUST be afraid that you will be exposed as the frauds you are. Play or be played! Oh, and if you get no response for a posting you applied for perhaps its only because there are thousands of us who are unemployed and applying for the same jobs. Fools will believe its some list that is the cause of your not getting anywhere- its just a symptom of your over inflated ego believing you are so important that you must be listed on a do not hire spreadsheet that doesnt exist. Ask yourself this, why do you find it easier to believe an unproven statement that a blacklist exists vs a more patent truth that those who burn bridges suffer the consequences of a poor reputation (and then start stupid threads like this one)?
 


















Anonymous said:
What list? How can you be sure you are not being played? Seriously, all of you who are concerned MUST be afraid that you will be exposed as the frauds you are. Play or be played! Oh, and if you get no response for a posting you applied for perhaps its only because there are thousands of us who are unemployed and applying for the same jobs. Fools will believe its some list that is the cause of your not getting anywhere- its just a symptom of your over inflated ego believing you are so important that you must be listed on a do not hire spreadsheet that doesnt exist. Ask yourself this, why do you find it easier to believe an unproven statement that a blacklist exists vs a more patent truth that those who burn bridges suffer the consequences of a poor reputation (and then start stupid threads like this one)?
Click to expand...

Yes... Publicis has burned a bridge with quite a few people. I'm very sure that you were meaning vice versa and no I'm not a fraud. My ego is not out of control. I have no idea whether I would be on this list. I still think it's very sad if people are being placed on it because they are "too old".
 






Anonymous said:
So who gave you this "understanding"? And how does it stay at a zero sum of 1698 names? You seem to indicate you know so please guve us a name of who gave you this understanding....
Click to expand...

What makes you think it stays at 1698 names? The DM that posted on here said they "use" to work here. So when they left it likely had that many names on it when this person left and the most recent copy available to them. Can you understand that concept or are you really that dense? Sounds a lot like HR posting or some incredibly stupid and naïve rep.
 






So do not rehire? Why would someone create this list if one truly exists? If the resume is the measuring stick then if you have the cred you get the interview. To me it shows favoritism in the fact that a manager can get you on this list how? If you do you job and didn't break any laws or rules set forth by the company and the industry why should anyone be on this list? Seems to me like they are looking for sheep to follow the flock and ask no questions and your sales results don't matter.
 






It seems as though people who ask questions for clarification are a huge liability threat for Publicis. Therefore, they are boxed and labeled as thief, fraudulent, non- compliant, and if they cause too much trouble... We'll adjust their numbers and call average to say they didn't perform well. Yep, it's just too easy for a manager to make a nice little frame to place these "troublemakers" in and a person that's highly successful in business would bury these guys for going after them. But yes, if you have an impressive background, track record, and varied industry experience, their special little list won't stop you.
 






Anonymous said:
So do not rehire? Why would someone create this list if one truly exists? If the resume is the measuring stick then if you have the cred you get the interview. To me it shows favoritism in the fact that a manager can get you on this list how? If you do you job and didn't break any laws or rules set forth by the company and the industry why should anyone be on this list? Seems to me like they are looking for sheep to follow the flock and ask no questions and your sales results don't matter.
Click to expand...

The above is a perfect example of the type of rep PSS employs: dumb, almost illiterate and a know it all that is happy with this temp no where job. Too funny.
 






Anonymous said:
My understanding is that the list is updated twice a year.
Click to expand...

If its only updated twice a year then that leaves so much room for people soon to be on the next updated list to sneak in before the update and be hired! I am so happy you have been told this- you seem to know so much. However, logically, I believe it proves that IF there IS a list it would be updated every day ( not two times a year).
 






Anonymous said:
It seems as though people who ask questions for clarification are a huge liability threat for Publicis. Therefore, they are boxed and labeled as thief, fraudulent, non- compliant, and if they cause too much trouble... We'll adjust their numbers and call average to say they didn't perform well. Yep, it's just too easy for a manager to make a nice little frame to place these "troublemakers" in and a person that's highly successful in business would bury these guys for going after them. But yes, if you have an impressive background, track record, and varied industry experience, their special little list won't stop you.
Click to expand...

Hear! Hear!
 












Notice that any response you post on here goes to review? That is because PSS HR keeps contacting this site for constant removal. A woman that put her email address on the original thread about this list (to send it out to those who wanted it) was contacted by email by a PSS attorney with legal threats. She is the one I received the list from. Apparently PSS is VERY worried about this list getting out, as they should be.
 






It's pretty funny that there's a list prepared by many DMs that were fired as direct emoployees from major pharmaceutical companies, yet most sales reps that were coming to Publicis due to a layoff are the ones being placed on it. Hmmmmmm... Bitter much??
 






Anonymous said:
I talked to a recruiter from another company. She also had a copy of the Do Not Rehire List from Publicis and she was actively using it.
Click to expand...

So, let me get this straight. You are in a discussion with a recruiter for another company about.....what....the weather? or a position that you posted for? If so, I can only imagine the conversation you had that brought up the fact that you believe you are on a Do Not Hire List for Publicis and this recruiter said, I am familiar with this list and I actively use it too. How pathetic people are to believe this crap. Yes, I call BS on this whole thread nut I enjoy knowing that there are those of you who live by the delusion that such a list exists and that your name is on it. I have a solution...name the recruiter who has the list so that everyone who believes it exists can check in with her to see if their name is on it!
 






The list is real. I am a former DM and when the contracted ended I was asked if there were any representatives I would not rehire. If I were to submit anyone I needed to provide a reason(s) and documentation.
 






Anonymous said:
The list is real. I am a former DM and when the contracted ended I was asked if there were any representatives I would not rehire. If I were to submit anyone I needed to provide a reason(s) and documentation.
Click to expand...

As far as I am concerned, that is perfectly acceptable and no one should complain. If you have a good reason to fall on the list, it's probably your own fault
 
























Top Bottom
Back
Quote