Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Its over. Look at J&J board.... displaced reps taking this product. So sorry
That's a good point - yes, I am speculating to be positive since the word has been positive, albeit a delay.
You mentioned Nov 5th. Do you speculate that offers would go out sooner for that start date as often they are many weeks prior to the start date?
Where has your insight come from? I understand there may be a meeting early Nov and felt that offers soon so that training is done by that time.
I do like positive speculation.
Its over. Look at J&J board.... displaced reps taking this product. So sorry
If this decision is due to approval of the afib indication, was there an expectation that it would be approved before November? I believe Nov was the original date, not earlier. Is this true or were they expected an earlier approval, thus justifying the need to hire asap. Or, if not, and not til Nov, then... that would not be the hold up, would it?
I agree! They were hiring for this Nov date from the beginning. Nothing was guarenteed then, just like it's not guarenteed now.
If this decision is due to approval of the afib indication, was there an expectation that it would be approved before November? I believe Nov was the original date, not earlier. Is this true or were they expected an earlier approval, thus justifying the need to hire asap. Or, if not, and not til Nov, then... that would not be the hold up, would it?
Does no one read the reports from the commitee?...They brought up points that J&J did not expect, they assumed clear sailing when came out 3-2 against the hired the best to argue and got it passed to the full vote...If it had been 5-0 and 12-0 then they would have had no problem hiring right away...
Companies have to be positive that everything is fine, they have to hold the stock price. I promoted a drug that killed people and on they day it was pulled we had a conference call saying there was no way it was getting pulled evderything is fine and then boom pulled...
Actually, they weren't blind-sided. If you read the editorials and other commentaries on The Rocket study, these exact concerns were brought up a month ago after it's release in NEJM. Nothing is smooth sailing these days with FDA approvals and companies are very aware of this. Yep, companies will always remain positive, even when the ship is sinking. If you've been in pharma for any lenghth of time, you know this.
I have no idea if I this contract is gonna fly, but I guess I tend to see things as glass half-full, rather than half-empty. It also helps to take control of the things you can, applying for jobs, networking, etc sure helps.
I like this positivity! Finally a half-full post on cafepharma.
I liken the half full glass concept to "NO EXPECTATIONS" concept...that way you are not disappointed
A lot of it has to do with the angle of the dangle. If it's dangling properly at a 45 degree angle you should be OK. If not you could be in a heap of trouble.
Just got another email from Quintiles contact stated nothing
new to report, still moving forward and have a good
weekend. Another week gone and the chances of this
contract happening look less likely to me.
Then why doesn't Janssen just pull the pin. Do they think they can delay this process for another 7 weeks until FDA ruling? Really?
Then why doesn't Janssen just pull the pin. Do they think they can delay this process for another 7 weeks until FDA ruling? Really?