Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
I find the suit is much easier to understand if you read it in the voice of a whiny 9 year old girl.
DSI WAS THE SHITTIEST COMPANY I EVER WORKED FOR.
Again people, I didn't read the lawsuit but from what I've seen and heard from my wife who works here, IM NOT SURPRISED!!! Especially in the Northeast!!
can someone please explain to me the logic in complaining about low wages?
What happens during an interview? The company meets a possible hire and explains the role. The hire then reviews their background and experience. The two parties than have to determine if there's a fit.
If the company is interested, it can offer you a salary for your efforts at what it thinks you are worth. The individual can hear that number and decide if it is enough for them and accept or refuse the amount.
If they offered $20,000....you'd probably refuse it
if they offered $40,000....you'd probably refuse it
They offered $65,000......you accepted it.
Now four years later you decide that it wasn't enough and you'd like more money?
Suppose the company reviewed your last four years of employment and decided they didn't get the return on their investment and they'd like you to pay back some of your salary? They'd like to pay you less now.
How is either case different?
Point is: Regardless of what anyone else is getting paid or not, you were presented a salary to accept or decline. You accepted it. How dare you think you are entitled to anything else after the fact!
DSI WAS THE SHITTIEST COMPANY I EVER WORKED FOR.
I blame HR for this...they put a person literally right out of college handling the West Area. What do you expect....she was like a deer in the headlights!
Funny how no one has a opposite argument to present
Why is that?
Because the post was too long and no one wasted time reading it.
In reading the suit I see that they are complaining about having to attend dinners in smoky environments and then later they are complaining that other reps are "rewarded" with dinners that they weren't invited to attend?
So you are seeking $100 million because you weren't asked to attend a dinner that you wouldn't want to attend?
While the above example is quite humorous, I feel sad because this frivolous lawsuit cheapens the credibility of people who may have actual real discrimination going on elsewhere. So sad.
Just read that since this suit came to light, 40 new DSI resp have joined the lawsuit, including 7 men.
Just read that since this suit came to light, 40 new DSI resp have joined the lawsuit, including 7 men.
Wow. Imagine that I am just some poor schlub online and I shredded every one of the supposed "offenses" without any valid response from the other side. Just wait until court. I guess you're all banking on a really dumb jury?