anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Because this was a Takeda product, right? We purchased Colcrys idiot lawyer and stupid rep
Because this was a Takeda product, right? We purchased Colcrys idiot lawyer and stupid rep
Did you read the article? It has nothing to do with the purchase or what URL did. It talks about a clinical trial that Takeda manipulated.
Got it? Now who looks stupid?
Yes I did but didn't have to. Colcrys was approved before we purchased it. The study was conducted by URL before we got involved. Takeda didn't set up the study. The study was done because the FDA was going to pull colchicine from the market along with another 2000 drugs that were never approved but was currently being sold. This great "article" (which is not an article but you are most likely a young in and don't have a clue as to what you read and believe everything on the Internet) mentions how the government is not involved. Also they mention the people from URL as the ones responsible for the study.
Now I don't look stupid but in fact smart. You my friend are a sheep and believe everything you read and post without actually doing any research. The fact that this is all info reps that work at Takeda are fully aware of because we had to deal with the complaints about price for 6 months and what big bad Takeda did. But we made sure the docs understood there would be no Colchicine/Colcrys if it wasn't for that lawyer group URL and if it wasn't for Takeda.
Seriously you don't have a clue. Stop reading headlines and do some research before you post. Get a clue
Totally incorrect. The FDA was not going to pull generic colchicine from the market and Takeda bought this drug knowing full well that it could blow up in their face which it has. I would hardly call that / you smart
Totally incorrect. The FDA was not going to pull generic colchicine from the market and Takeda bought this drug knowing full well that it could blow up in their face which it has. I would hardly call that / you smart
Yep and nowhere in this article does it say the fda was going to pull generic colchicine. You're wrong dummy
Enough already girls. Stop the hair pulling. It's getting obnoxious, like listening to a coupla 6 year olds
OP said anonymously knowing they did a major faux pas
The program was to incentivize company's to conduct additional research so the door of uncertainty could be closed on certain off label indications
it had been used this way for over 20yrs and would not fall into the category of needing to be pulled
You
Dumbshit
Just google it. In 2006 this was set up to remove drugs from the market but give the opportunity for these drugs to go through the same standards as current medication. No new study, drug gets pulled.
Colchicine wasn't pulled because of URL's study that you are referring to above. I am so confused as to why you think otherwise. It's pretty simple. Colchicine is pointed to as the issue with the program. But the fact still remains, the FDA's initiative was to "remove unapproved" drugs from the market.