anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Did you see who they hired for quality. One more clown in the car.
Which clown are you referring to?
Did you see who they hired for quality. One more clown in the car.
C'mon peeps. There's good and bad and in-between and whiners in every organization. Ya'll are falling into the latter category.
Congrats to those Amgenex'ers who have landed on their feet at LakeCentre (NKA: BMC). Please take the best of what you learned at Amgen, grow it at Medi, and leave the bad behind. Take an inward look and improve yourself. Make BMC a success, and it's good for patients and good for the local job market.
Sounds like you are mad that you weren't selected as a leader? The drug alone is late to the dance but in the end it is all about combinations, combinations.I want to see the plant succeed again too. I spent almost 20 years there. Which is why hiring who they hired is such a disappointment. Some very bad choices. And unfortunately the drug isn't going to compete. It's hardly even a competitor.
Sounds like you are mad that you weren't selected as a leader? The drug alone is late to the dance but in the end it is all about combinations, combinations.
C'mon peeps. There's good and bad and in-between and whiners in every organization. Ya'll are falling into the latter category.
Congrats to those Amgenex'ers who have landed on their feet at LakeCentre (NKA: BMC). Please take the best of what you learned at Amgen, grow it at Medi, and leave the bad behind. Take an inward look and improve yourself. Make BMC a success, and it's good for patients and good for the local job market.
Wow, Medi/AZ must be really bothering you. BMS and Merck are way out front as monotherapy but in the end people will look back and say "why didn't Merck and BMS understand it was all about combination therapy"? Then Merck and their trial lawyer CEO will resort to layoffs (which they are very good at) and BMS will get swallowed up by some Chinese investment group. Which will you fall under, the guy having to update his resume or having to learn Chinese?Then you need to look at the clinical trial data. There was just an article on that very topic. AZ has around half of what BMS and Merck have. They are way out front. These things don't fund themselves. They have too much of a lead time and we are too far behind.
Wow, Medi/AZ must be really bothering you. BMS and Merck are way out front as monotherapy but in the end people will look back and say "why didn't Merck and BMS understand it was all about combination therapy"? Then Merck and their trial lawyer CEO will resort to layoffs (which they are very good at) and BMS will get swallowed up by some Chinese investment group. Which will you fall under, the guy having to update his resume or having to learn Chinese?
We'll see how it plays out. IO is really all that AZ/MEDI has. If they bailout, where do they go next? Perhaps it will be a sale.And I work for Medimmune. I would like it to stay that way but everything that the investment analysts are saying doesn't paint a pretty picture. What you are saying simply isn't the case. Both other companies have far more clinical trials in both mono and combo. I am hoping that I was missing something but that doesn't seem to be it. AZ is way off their crazy financial targets and that usually spells dramatic changes. It's not hard to find the data and opinions. It's all out there.
Just keep focused on your submission. There are 71 checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical or clinical development. Medi is #4. You will be fine.And I work for Medimmune. I would like it to stay that way but everything that the investment analysts are saying doesn't paint a pretty picture. What you are saying simply isn't the case. Both other companies have far more clinical trials in both mono and combo. I am hoping that I was missing something but that doesn't seem to be it. AZ is way off their crazy financial targets and that usually spells dramatic changes. It's not hard to find the data and opinions. It's all out there.
Who is whining? We are just talking about the pipeline.
BMS and Merck will win the battle but not the warAnd I work for Medimmune. I would like it to stay that way but everything that the investment analysts are saying doesn't paint a pretty picture. What you are saying simply isn't the case. Both other companies have far more clinical trials in both mono and combo. I am hoping that I was missing something but that doesn't seem to be it. AZ is way off their crazy financial targets and that usually spells dramatic changes. It's not hard to find the data and opinions. It's all out there.