Let's play "Antibodies for Alzheimers!"





Risk factors include: low education levels, high blood pressure, smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, diabetes, excessive alcohol consumption, brain injury and air pollution.

We believe that several other factors that could have a positive impact will likely soon be added to the Lancet’s list: Consuming a Mediterranean diet, optimizing sleep, reducing stress, combating elevated blood levels of homocysteine with B-vitamins, managing high cholesterol and, for the right people (e.g., those with the APOE4 gene) and at the right dose, supplementing with Omega-3 fatty acids.

Opinion: Why aren't doctors telling patients these simple ways to reduce the risk of dementia? | CNN
 




Risk factors include: low education levels, high blood pressure, smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, diabetes, excessive alcohol consumption, brain injury and air pollution.

We believe that several other factors that could have a positive impact will likely soon be added to the Lancet’s list: Consuming a Mediterranean diet, optimizing sleep, reducing stress, combating elevated blood levels of homocysteine with B-vitamins, managing high cholesterol and, for the right people (e.g., those with the APOE4 gene) and at the right dose, supplementing with Omega-3 fatty acids.

Opinion: Why aren't doctors telling patients these simple ways to reduce the risk of dementia? | CNN

So, can a ~30% reduction in the progression of the disease be obtained by early sufferers, without the antibody treatments? Anyone from medical care to chime in?

It sure would be great to see a statistical study for non-pharmacologic interventions too, as a sort of benchmark, to keep us all honest. If we are not honest, we should not be selling at all.
 




So, can a ~30% reduction in the progression of the disease be obtained by early sufferers, without the antibody treatments? Anyone from medical care to chime in?

It sure would be great to see a statistical study for non-pharmacologic interventions too, as a sort of benchmark, to keep us all honest. If we are not honest, we should not be selling at all.

Sounds like a good thesis topic. Not sure that this sort of analysis belongs in a for-profit institution, however.

Sure, a cost-benefit analysis weighted with economic costs associated with somewhat risky pharmacologic interventions vis-a-vis lifestyle (diet, exercise, social, educational, etc) interventions, why not?
 




Sounds like a good thesis topic. Not sure that this sort of analysis belongs in a for-profit institution, however.

Sure, a cost-benefit analysis weighted with economic costs associated with somewhat risky pharmacologic interventions vis-a-vis lifestyle (diet, exercise, social, educational, etc) interventions, why not?

Honesty v. Greed, Corruption, Lies, & Deceit

Judge Bought Andpaidfor will have the honor.
 




















Someone on this thread needs serious therapy.

Maybe you’re just the competition who is scared shitless about the whipping you’re going to get!

Sure, drug them into oblivion or worse. It worked with Zyprexa. Pride cometh before the fall (and multibillion dollar lawsuits). There are conscientious Lilly employees. But not in high level management, it seems. Prove me wrong.
 




Sounds like a good thesis topic. Not sure that this sort of analysis belongs in a for-profit institution, however.

Sure, a cost-benefit analysis weighted with economic costs associated with somewhat risky pharmacologic interventions vis-a-vis lifestyle (diet, exercise, social, educational, etc) interventions, why not?

Why not? There is no big money available for such studies without a future ROI. The true cure for alz and dementia is most likely diet and exercise earlier on in life ( carb intake+ high-energy diet, growing insulin resistance, nafld, ascvd, and much later on amyloid buildup, all of this is of course highly related), but no one is going to pay for that long-term study. Best chance for a viable therapy is most likely a glp-1RA, but unfortunately it's not looking like one from Lilly, at least not at this time. Just being honest here.
 








Why not? There is no big money available for such studies without a future ROI. The true cure for alz and dementia is most likely diet and exercise earlier on in life ( carb intake+ high-energy diet, growing insulin resistance, NAFLD, asked, and much later on amyloid buildup, all of this is of course highly related), but no one is going to pay for that long-term study. The best chance for a viable therapy is most likely a glp-1RA, but unfortunately, it's not looking like one from Lilly, at least not now. Just being honest here.

At what age will it be acceptable to die? Is it possible to expire with ALZ and still have a rewarding life? I think it is. A. The world is overpopulated. B. You're going to die. C. Focusing on ALZ is a blatant money ploy.