Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Like the previous post asked, got any ideas? Nothing much has changed with the recommended screening intervals and the recommendations do makes sense. There has always been a lot of burnout in cytology and many cytology schools have closed due to saturation, but the field will be around for quite a while to come. In terms of gynecological Paps, do the math. How many women are there in the USA and how many cytotechnologists are there? With the passage of the Affordable Care Act, we look forward to more hospital labs to employ non-gynecologic testing in house. And if and when a cost/benefit analysis is done on the cost effectiveness of gynecological testing automated with screening devices, Hologic, the manufacturer (as a result of an exceptional expert marketing plan by the former Cytyc corp.) is the only real winner.
Only with more competition in the lab business and some strong enforcement of antitrust laws will things improve for those in the diagnostic portion of the business.
I highly doubt many hospitals are looking to bring non-gyn work in-house due to the affordable care act. PATHOLOGISTS sign those out anyways. YOu can have a histotech or other low cost employee go make slides on FNAs. The only thing a cytotech can do is sign out negative pap tests. That is the only real skill the schools gave them and they should be ashamed. More schools should close.
If anything in-office labs (urologists etc) will continue bringing NONGYN testing to THEIR facilities as work migrates out of hospital settings. Guess what, cytotechs arent employed in those places. They have a histotech and some low-cost pathologist, who signs everything out.
The screening devices were about 20 years too late. They wont have much of a shelf life. HOlogic knows it and adapted by buying gen-probe.