Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
So true. I gave ID a commision plan than paid well for those who really worked hard with no cap and those that did not work hard got nothing. I was told no it cost too much. Cheap SOB!
I shall not argue with the business model; it works for the purpose that you mention, however it is not a recipe for long term aggressive growth. It takes extremely talented sales people to compete with the big boys and their marketing machines and all their sales people in the field without getting burned out and tired of getting beat up in the field. I am not referring to getting a bunch of new, nobody GP accounts that place 20 implants per year. I am referring to going out and competing with and winning those specialists accounts that are placing at least 400+ implants per year with Zimmer, Nobel & Straumann. C'mon, lets get real, ask any Implant Direct rep how many Oral Surgeons, Periodontists or Prosthodontists that place 400+ implants per year in their territory and you will find the number to be disgraceful. The solution = compensate your top producers AS THEY AGGRESSIVELY GROW. You want to lead? Then motivate your sales people!
As an example: A rep achieves 30% growth, which is what is being asked, so he earns his 5%. BUT, what if he grows 40% or 50% or hell, even 60%-75% in 1 year.....those are numbers that should be rewarded at a different level. Perhaps:
40% growth = 6%
50% growth = 8%
60+% growth = 10%
If you disagree, then you have no interest in weeding out weak performers in order to identify and keep your top performers. In fact, if you disagree, then you truly have no interest in being top 3 in 5 years. Where is the carrot?