WSJ knows, too. They published an article that Pfizer needs to right the ship. The article lists failures, missed opportunities and leadership miscues. The Journal knows, investors know. Just our leadership and board in denial, preparing to dispense rich rewards to the sorry crew
FIRE AB
- Thread starter anonymous
- Start date
-
- Tags
- None
WSJ knows, too. They published an article that Pfizer needs to right the ship. The article lists failures, missed opportunities and leadership miscues. The Journal knows, investors know. Just our leadership and board in denial, preparing to dispense rich rewards to the sorry crew
Im going to go all caps here
ITS A MISTAKE TO BELIEVE THAT OUR CURRENT CEO IS OUR ONLY PROBLEM. SOMEONE NEEDS TO COME IN FROM THE OUTSIDE AND PULL A "JACK WELCH" RANK & YANK, from C-suite down to the manager level.
Unfortunately, not only is the leadership team weak, our board is weak. It’s not a good set up.
Angela was horrendous.....empty headed and BS and she brought her cronies and ran out performers. soft and stupid.
agree completely, others like Sussman who have pushed the company to focus on social issues rather than business need to go as well. They like to write books touting their "leadership', then the other c-suite cronies push each others books on social media.
When things are going smoothly here, all kinds of shenanigans take hold. The behaviors that you frequently describe are a small contributor. The larger issue is the lack of vision at almost all levels. And of course, since this is Pfizer, rampant cronyism when selecting said leaders and managers.
Arena, biohaven, GBT and Seattle…was this the best use of 60+B???
how much $ has the respective products brought in? what is the return on the investment?
Angela made some really bad decisions. But let’s be honest, she was protected. The whole Connect thing was her baby. We couldn’t call the baby ugly on her watch so we had to live with it. With her gone, I see it going away sooner than later.
Wasn’t she also responsible for establishing the Derm division?
In some areas, we also added some head count in existing divisions and started new departments
yep, she thought what worked for telephone sales reps in vaccines would transfer to other office types. Either she was fooled by her vaccines toadies like schutta or none of them understood the difference between selling a tangible need like a vaccine and other types of pharma products.
BTW, telephone sales only worked in pediatric offices for direct orders.
Not just big and bad. Also bold ones. And agile ones that were bad in multiple ways.
So anyway, back to the topic. Fire Albert, morale sucks and stock is even worse.
The Connect project never should have seen the light of day. It was comical when they said "this is what customers are asking for." The "leaders" that rolled out the concept, and sold it to the field as "next level sales", quickly moved into other roles. And, to have PharmD's available to answer customers questions...bahahahah. This was sold as a "Bold Move"...someone needs to admit it was a mistake and roll up the carpets on this one.
My FMD fielded one question on the synchronous site. What a big waste of time that was. They had to sit by the computer in case a question came in.
We can overwhelm this site with anecdotes of blunders here. Literally.
Agree, I’ll go first. Out of the many capable business focused CEO candidates, the board picked this social warrior knucklehead AB.
Beat that
Unfortunately, picking wrong candidates for CEO is nothing new here. As evidence I give you the reigns of CEOs McKinnell and Kindler.