"Do Not Rehire" list?

Quote












When someone calls Publicis for employment verification and is questioned regarding

Reason for separation?
Performance?
eligible for rehire?

What info is given?
Legally, companies can give out any information they want. Most companies say they will verify only the dates of employment because of the potential liability that could arise from negative information given about former employees to potential employers.
This doesn't mean that negative information is not being given out.

If you were fired, would that information be given to someone doing a pre-employment check?

If someone knows this information, could you please provide it?

If your one of the smart ass trolls that always has to leave an unhelpful smart ass remark, skip it. Go take your meds and go the f@&k to sleep.
 










































anonymous said:
Who cares put my name on it in bold print then an asterisk followed by these words “this mutha fucks is out of line”
Click to expand...

Be glad you are on it. Any company that treats experienced tenured reps like they do does not deserve experience personnel. Let them go out and find someone else that has little to no experience because that's all that is left out there to pick from.
 


















For those stating that they want to be on it...Understand that it’s being circulated outside of Publicis and to other Pharm companies. This is because managers that have access to it, they leave and go to other companies and they bring that excel file with them and share it. Oh and by the way, it’s ok for them to fuck You like that if you’re not a minority or protected class and as an FYI, being a woman doesn’t count unless you have dark skin. The dark skinned reverse racists in HR are very proud of that fact.
 






anonymous said:
For those stating that they want to be on it...Understand that it’s being circulated outside of Publicis and to other Pharm companies. This is because managers that have access to it, they leave and go to other companies and they bring that excel file with them and share it. Oh and by the way, it’s ok for them to fuck You like that if you’re not a minority or protected class and as an FYI, being a woman doesn’t count unless you have dark skin. The dark skinned reverse racists in HR are very proud of that fact.
Click to expand...

If your a Manager or RC that posted this good luck because one of your colleagues was served papers by Corp. Attorneys recently and guess what happen.. they turned into a scared little wuss. If this. List is true and you are circulating it... get ready for a nice big slander defemation case.
 






Honestly, the list has been circulated for years and not a damn thing has been done about it. The list of names just grows and people who have tried to hire attorneys have been told to let it go.
 






anonymous said:
Honestly, the list has been circulated for years and not a damn thing has been done about it. The list of names just grows and people who have tried to hire attorneys have been told to let it go.
Click to expand...

This is not a "TRY" it has happened. And no foolish manager would ever "try to intimidate" someone after someone lawyers up. And, there is this thing in discovery called a deposition and if you lie during it, it's call perjury which is a felony. There are to many leaks in "their" system.
 


















anonymous said:
It's only going to take one person to produce the list and verify it to bring the whole house down. Perjury is a funny thing...
Click to expand...

It's only going to take one or two dominos to fall if this thing is circulating outside the company and publicly. There will be no litigation needed, just negotiation of a settlement. Individuals w/ knowledge of this list have the keys to the kingdom for a nice retirement package. This company makes the Reps lie everyday on calls. They are so used to having Reps lie they forget that outside the company perjury is illegal.
 






anonymous said:
This is not a "TRY" it has happened. And no foolish manager would ever "try to intimidate" someone after someone lawyers up. And, there is this thing in discovery called a deposition and if you lie during it, it's call perjury which is a felony. There are to many leaks in "their" system.
Click to expand...
So why has no one been contacted to collect damages or to join a class action? It’s because no one is willing to bear that expense on their own to get it started or because they just want to blow hot air. It’s not right or ethical that this has happened, but the talk has been going on for over six years.
People will say...”Just wait and see. These people are going down.” Yet all we ever see or hear are crickets chirping.

It’s not right, but also understand that pharma and the government are hand in glove. Pharma is only tried in our judicial system if one of those fuckers really piss someone off on the inside and a reason is needed to take someone or a group of individuals down, then something will be done.
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote