anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Same old nonsense. Get vaccinated, wear condoms, blah, blah, blah.
Never wrapped up at a sales meeting and is all is well.
Never wrapped up at a sales meeting and is all is well.
November 22, 1963What date did they give for exemption approval or denial? I’m just curious if anybody got approved for either a religious or medical exemption
This is actually quite a clever response. Sadly, only 3 or 4 people will understand the reference.November 22, 1963
This is actually quite a clever response. Sadly, only 3 or 4 people will understand the reference.
No one is entitled to a job at Lilly. You don’t walk into work and say things that are against company policy — isn’t that a move against your freedom? I could list dozens of things you don’t do at work (wear offensive clothes, park in the middle of the road, bring all your relatives into a secure area). — all of which impinge on your personal freedom. But it’s Lilly’s workplace and it’s Lilly’s road and it’s Lilly’s secure area. Not yours and not mine. If you want to be non-vaccinated at home or smoke at home or park in your yard that’s your choice. If you want to stay employed at Lilly, you abide by policy. Employees all signed off on the training for conduct as a condition of our employment. We all do this once per year. It is a choice with valid information provided and time to consider given to you by Lilly. But it’s still not your company and leadership makes the decisions. It’s never been any different. And it’s not any different any where else.
Can you get fat by having a fat person breathe on you?
Are they really going to fire someone for not being vaccinated? That is ridiculous if it is true.As the “vacate” date approaches, anyone planning on getting the vaccine at the last minute?
Many in the company believe the remaining 5% of unvaccinated employees will ultimately decide to be vaccinated instead of being unemployed.
Yes! Let's see the safety data from the people who have gotten vaccinated 5 -10 years from now. They started with the older crowd because many will die in 5 - 10 years anyway.Sheep - I SAY NOT! Insightful thoughts about the narrative surrounding Vaccine
If it requires coercion, manipulation
gaslighting, 24/7 advertising, fear mongering
, silencing of dissenting opinions and experts,
slandering of alternative options, tons of
questionable incentives and indemnification
from liability, then it isn't required for health.
We will see the safety outcomes 2-5 years. Let’s see who is arrogant then.
We have seen the data for 1 year of not being vaccinated. It resulted in half a million deaths, the world economy being put on hold and all of our lives disrupted.Yes! Let's see the safety data from the people who have gotten vaccinated 5 -10 years from now. They started with the older crowd because many will die in 5 - 10 years anyway.
Yes. Yes they will.Are they really going to fire someone for not being vaccinated? That is ridiculous if it is true.
Hey, genius ... companies can test their vaccines a LOT quicker during a pandemic than they could under normal circumstances, because there is a lot more disease circulating on which to test. So stop this stupid argument that the vaccines were developed too fast (and hence unsafe). You're full of BS and a sad excuse for a Lilly employee.Vaccine mandates on vaccines that have been studied for less than a year- with a higher rate of getting an enlarged heart or blood clot vs. actually dying from Covid is new. Forcing a vaccine on a population when it is proven that it doesn't stop transmission is new. Forging vaccination records for children isn't new either.
Not true. Lilly pay is aligned and competitive with national pay data of our peers. And there is no benchmarking to a specific company - that is against the law.
The benchmark is an entry level syneos gsk sales rep.Benchmarked against several other companies - true. Competitive in pay - false
Significantly underpaid compared to industry - true.
Not true or accurate in any way, shape or form. Benchmarked against pharma peer companies nationally. Well paid and benefited. Now get back to work.Benchmarked against several other companies - true. Competitive in pay - false
Significantly underpaid compared to industry - true.
Not true or accurate in any way, shape or form. Benchmarked against pharma peer companies nationally. Well paid and benefited. Now get back to work.