anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Newton left?
Not true. Rumor has it they asked Newton to run US sales
Newton left?
Oh yeah, '23 will be the year for sure to hit 15%. Ryan consulted the magic 8-ball at the start of the year and after 12 shakes with unnaceptable replies, he finally got the response he was looking for... "without a doubt". Meanwhile Ramon, conjuring the power of his spirit ancestors, can't get anything but "goodbye" from the ouija board.You didn’t miss anything. The company is expanding and working towards 15% US market share. Great time to get on board.
Huh, I was always told that ah-tool was the high preist in charge of BIOsuccess spells.Oh yeah, '23 will be the year for sure to hit 15%. Ryan consulted the magic 8-ball at the start of the year and after 12 shakes with unnaceptable replies, he finally got the response he was looking for... "without a doubt". Meanwhile Ramon, conjuring the power of his spirit ancestors, can't get anything but "goodbye" from the ouija board.
Oh yeah, '23 will be the year for sure to hit 15%. Ryan consulted the magic 8-ball at the start of the year and after 12 shakes with unnaceptable replies, he finally got the response he was looking for... "without a doubt". Meanwhile Ramon, conjuring the power of his spirit ancestors, can't get anything but "goodbye" from the ouija board.
More years of bonus famine for those that are eligable. Hopefully they find a way to keep the paychecks coming but even that seems far from a sure bet given what's happenig with expenses.
why are people still writing so much about PN he was solid in his days style is not relevant anymore. and he is polarizing. I heard from BIO colleague the company is focusing more on marketing less on the PN empire. Heard new head of marketing won over management and Berlin.
That'll be the day! BIO has NEVER respcted the power of marketing nor invested in it. As compared to MDT, BSX or ABT our % of sales that goes into marketing is a pittance and getting slimmer every year. I have no clue how enamored the Berlin leadership is with the newest flavor of BINC marketing leadership but I can tell you as a 10+ year veteran who's seen no fewer than 5 people lead marketing in my tenure (Rex, Carol, Wolf, Katerina and the latest seat filler), the company (and Max specifically) does not beleive in the power of marketing. Heck, I vividly recall Jake in his time calling it "hocus pocus." BIO still beleives that great products will sell themselves. That is total BS and if you are in the field you know this well. If it was true, why do customers still prefer MDTs crap 10:1? Hint: it has something to do with marketing!why are people still writing so much about PN he was solid in his days style is not relevant anymore. and he is polarizing. I heard from BIO colleague the company is focusing more on marketing less on the PN empire. Heard new head of marketing won over management and Berlin.
That'll be the day! BIO has NEVER respcted the power of marketing nor invested in it. As compared to MDT, BSX or ABT our % of sales that goes into marketing is a pittance and getting slimmer every year. I have no clue how enamored the Berlin leadership is with the newest flavor of BINC marketing leadership but I can tell you as a 10+ year veteran who's seen no fewer than 5 people lead marketing in my tenure (Rex, Carol, Wolf, Katerina and the latest seat filler), the company (and Max specifically) does not beleive in the power of marketing. Heck, I vividly recall Jake in his time calling it "hocus pocus." BIO still beleives that great products will sell themselves. That is total BS and if you are in the field you know this well. If it was true, why do customers still prefer MDTs crap 10:1? Hint: it has something to do with marketing!
I don't disagree at all with the "tipping factor" point. But how did they get there? MDT spent more in marketing and less in R&D - putting a lot of gloss on somewhat technically inferior products. They invest in innovation that is marketable... and if it has a clinical benefit, that's a bonus. And they accept a rate of product failure that would make any Schaldach's blood boil. As a company, MDT is okay with producing "good enough" products. BIO on the other hand still strives for perfection when the market is clearly telling us that "good enough" is perfectly acceptable. Doctors are not "immune" to marketing. How many times have you heard a customer parrot MDT marketing messaging in your face? I certainly have. I don't know if BIO investing heavily into marketing at this point would move the needle at all - the CRM oligopolies control 95% of the U.S. market and BIO simply does not have enough might to breaktrough that barrier.Bio isn’t wrong. There are very few accounts that decide on crm products based on the latest algorithm or marketing bell and whistle. The rep doesn’t even matter in most circumstances anymore. If you are wondering why MDT still has the lions share it’s because of the tipping point and the fact Bio never hit it.
In addition to not moving the needle, I think Bio is kind of cornered here. If Bio shifted focus, became less risk adverse, reduced spending on innovation and quality and boosted spending on marketing there is significant risk that any recall, even a minor one, could be fatal. The industry somewhat excuses Medtronic's indescretions becuase they are considered too big to fail. That's not the case with Bio.I don't disagree at all with the "tipping factor" point. But how did they get there? MDT spent more in marketing and less in R&D - putting a lot of gloss on somewhat technically inferior products. They invest in innovation that is marketable... and if it has a clinical benefit, that's a bonus. And they accept a rate of product failure that would make any Schaldach's blood boil. As a company, MDT is okay with producing "good enough" products. BIO on the other hand still strives for perfection when the market is clearly telling us that "good enough" is perfectly acceptable. Doctors are not "immune" to marketing. How many times have you heard a customer parrot MDT marketing messaging in your face? I certainly have. I don't know if BIO investing heavily into marketing at this point would move the needle at all - the CRM oligopolies control 95% of the U.S. market and BIO simply does not have enough might to breaktrough that barrier.
Thinking about the former, doubtful on the latter. There's no backfilling at Bio, only more intense flogging of the survivors to pick up the slack.Bio is the place to be in the best device sector in all of cardiology. ASP’s dropped over the last 15 years but that pricing pressure has come to an end. Docs are continuing to put patient needs above their own and basing device selections on technology. If you can’t thrive in this environment you should resign and Bio will backfill you promptly.
And the flogging is about to grow more intense as a result of the first quarter. I don't think it will be long before we are informed of another round of belt tightening.Thinking about the former, doubtful on the latter. There's no backfilling at Bio, only more intense flogging of the survivors to pick up the slack.
And the flogging is about to grow more intense as a result of the first quarter. I don't think it will be long before we are informed of another round of belt tightening.
I have heard the company is extremely profitable and Max is more than pleased.
There are trolls on here who will say different but look no further than the investment Bio has made in R&D to tell the tale