I would be genuinely very interested to get unbiased information about this company, but it's hard to come by. Everyone seems to have an opinion. In these posts, the opinions seem to run more negative than positive. Then there are links to Spineblogger. I tried to figure out what their perspective is, and they seem to be negative on everything. They say in a recent post, "Interestingly, a few of our bloggers commented that rather than focus on the negative in spine, how do we change the public's perception and police the industry ourselves, especially in light of the controversy swirling around POD's and INFUSE?." So the fact that they are negative on this company does not seem to make this company unusual in any way. They are clearly not offering an unbiased review of the business model. My sense is that this company is less than rigorous when it comes to truth, advertising, marketing, and perhaps science. But that doesn't necessarily mean the company will fail or cannot be profitable. It is, after all, fairly small, and many companies start out somewhat shaky and then improve. Can anyone point to some truly unbiased analysis of these guys? Thanks. Dan