AIT Laboratories

Quote

Looks like AIT, et al, is on the ropes. With the Dept. of Labor going after Doc Evans for fake value on the ESOP ($106,200,000 according to Moss Adams when City Securities had valued AIT at $5,226,844) with Evans, Terrell, Pederson & Orme each getting $2,705,459.51 in cash. Looks like these aholes will be paying that money back, hope they have to pay interest. Maybe some day justice will be served and those of us with a stake in the fake ESOP may get something as promised. Check out Thomas Perez v. PBI Bank, Evans, AIT & ESOP, US District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Civil Action 14-1429.
 








Hey! folks from AIT from another Indy firm
Not Know Error
Just down the road.

We have so much in common! Extreme managerial enrichment to the detriment of the company-check! Abuse of the employer-employee relationship-check! Work that edges up against the Stark amendment-check! Nepotism-check! Stiffing vendors like crazy-check! A reputation best discussed after dark in whispers-check!

We about wet our pants when we learned about the ESOP, except, of course, the final chapter. 6X minimum fair value-and sell it to the employees with a straw man at the helm.
Don't get the charity part. For us, charity starts and ends at a man's right rear pocket.

Come on down-if you like being abused at AIT, you will love us. We are more the same with a healthy dose of daily malignancy.
 








Anonymous said:
Looks like AIT, et al, is on the ropes. With the Dept. of Labor going after Doc Evans for fake value on the ESOP ($106,200,000 according to Moss Adams when City Securities had valued AIT at $5,226,844) with Evans, Terrell, Pederson & Orme each getting $2,705,459.51 in cash. Looks like these aholes will be paying that money back, hope they have to pay interest. Maybe some day justice will be served and those of us with a stake in the fake ESOP may get something as promised. Check out Thomas Perez v. PBI Bank, Evans, AIT & ESOP, US District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Civil Action 14-1429.
Click to expand...
Amazing how Pederson left after getting the payout. He must have known this was a shady deal.
 








































Good ole AIT. If nothing is going right make sure you are the definition of unethical. No wonder AITs business is going my way. I heard the new thing is to lie to state governments. Wont be long till medicare goes after you guys.
 








Looks like trouble is coming to AIT over the employee charged with 100 felonies for drug trafficking. Very hypocritical to promise large organizations and state governments you can help clean up a mess that you are involved in promoting.
 
























































Anonymous said:
Telemarketing toxicology?
Click to expand...

The new strategy is to encourage large organizations to bill for work they don't perform but is performed by an AIT paid RN. They are trying to keep it on the down low but they have been recorded saying things quite differently than the marketing material for the program. Is it shocking that they have an employee indicted on 100 felonies? While they are doing that they are abandoning their physician clients because the service is substandard and they can't keep them. Its a desperate situation.
 
























an opinion expressed as a fact, that is untrue, is defamation. we are casting aside the sales practice itself, as it brings the whole industry down together. Whether true or not, it should not be part of an in-office presentation.
 
















Top Bottom
Back
Quote