Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
The American Revolution (1775-1783).
I'm glad you mention this one...
Anyone remember from US history class the Strictures upon the Declaration of Independence?
http://americainclass.org/sources/makingrevolution/rebellion/text8/hutchinsonrebuttal.pdf
"
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. For imposing taxes on us without our consent.
HUTCHINSON. How often has your Lordship heard it said that the Americans are willing to submit to the authority of Parliament in all cases except that of taxes? Here we have a declaration made to the world of the causes which have impelled separation. . . That of taxes seems to have been in danger of being forgot. It comes in late [in the Declaration] and in as slight a manner as is possible. And I know, my Lord, that these men, in the early days of their opposition to Parliament, have acknowledged that they pitched upon this subject of taxes because it was most alarming to the people, every man perceiving immediately that he is personally affected by it . . .
"
The hypocrisy runs deep:
http://prezi.com/yud_mhrtd4yf/argument-2-the-colonists-were-hypocrites/
Do not get me wrong, a revolution can be a good thing to shake up a tyrannical status quo.
But, based on false pretenses?
(Hmmmm, where and when have we seen that tactic used?)
Is it truly worth the price in blood when the outcome results in trading one set of power masters for another?
(Oh, F''' it. Let's chalk this up to evolution and consider it a lesson learned to avoid repeating the same mistakes over and over and over...)