Yes - Why do you rank them this way? And do you really feel you know enough about the ZDs (other than your own) to confidently speak to this?
Wrong - 1992
I was in that mess. I survived but in a different role. 1989.
Why is everyone so preoccupied with the history? What about the question in the thread?
Just laying out the history of failed zone/area managers.
There is a long history of losers running this company going back many years. At least in the past there were a few good ones but now overrun by ass kissing company people.
There is a long history of losers running this company going back many years. At least in the past there were a few good ones but now overrun by ass kissing company people.
Spot on accurate. THIS really is the fatal flaw right now. While management has historically been a train wreck at this company the "yes man" culture is the driving force now. I see it crystal clear in my own team and it really makes me puke.
I wonder if this is not the result of so many mass layoffs in the past few years? People look around and see who was "terminated" and decide they will just do anything to keep their job. It's a horribly unhealthy environment and makes respecting your teammates and managers difficult. And it is yet another catastrophe for the company.
The question is how can we even start to turn it around? Or are the "#@% kissers" so entrenched that we can't?
Until senior management realizes that the marketing department is void of any intellect and understands that it takes money to develop key marketing strategies with good marketing companies(only large animal health company that doesn't) MAH will continue to wallow in mediocrity until the AH division is divested. It is unfortunate that MAH continues to go blindly into this market with no accountabilty at any level outside of the sales area. But then who in their right mind with any sence would want to oversee MAH. Your current leader was the 4th choice. Good Luck!!! LOL!
Which current leader was "4th choice"? And how would you know that exactly?
Because don't you know the purpose of this board is to berate and judge people you don't even know? One look at some of the comments on here and you will find what is truly "wrong" with the company. The mirror would be a great place to start.
Like the old cliche...Talk is cheap. With Merck senior management this seems to be the course they take. How can you look at the past 3 years and even begin to believe that MAH is moving in the right direction within any area of the business. Do you really believe that your marketing managers make a difference? Do your really believe your ZD's and RM's make a difference? Cmon, who are you kidding. You don't have to look in any mirror to see what MAH can't deliver in the way of strategic marketing programs. Really, AS promoted to a Director because of someone truly believing he has political clout. WOW!! It starts at the top.
The entire animal health industry is headed in a questionable direction. It is now big business and getting bigger. Upper management is pressured by the powers that be at the parent company. ALL segments of the company must contribute positively to the bottom line. Everything and anything will be tried to attain a positive outcome. Those decisions trickle down. I do not think that there are many upper management individuals in animal health that know how to handle the pressure. I do not have the answer. It is evident that animal health is looking more and more like human health. Do not know if that is good, but it is heading that way.
It is amazing that the corporate heads don't see the differences between human side medicine and animal health. A comparison with dental medical practices and veterinary practices is a more logical analogy. The issue is that most of the management infusion to animal health are displaced human side managers and that system is all they know. They continue to try to pound a square peg into a round hole. All animal health divisions are held to a number by corporate but not all go about it in the same manner. Animal health managers directing animal health divisions do far better with results, customer satisfaction and sales staff morale compared to those that have human side managers guiding animal health organizations.The entire animal health industry is headed in a questionable direction. It is now big business and getting bigger. Upper management is pressured by the powers that be at the parent company. ALL segments of the company must contribute positively to the bottom line. Everything and anything will be tried to attain a positive outcome. Those decisions trickle down. I do not think that there are many upper management individuals in animal health that know how to handle the pressure. I do not have the answer. It is evident that animal health is looking more and more like human health. Do not know if that is good, but it is heading that way.
It is amazing that the corporate heads don't see the differences between human side medicine and animal health. A comparison with dental medical practices and veterinary practices is a more logical analogy. The issue is that most of the management infusion to animal health are displaced human side managers and that system is all they know. They continue to try to pound a square peg into a round hole. All animal health divisions are held to a number by corporate but not all go about it in the same manner. Animal health managers directing animal health divisions do far better with results, customer satisfaction and sales staff morale compared to those that have human side managers guiding animal health organizations.