Will SEC Football 8 Peat

[Anonymous]

During the 80`s the Pac won 0 national titles. 90`s the Pac won 1. 2000`s Pac won 1.... 3 in last 35 years. The little 1o did not win any in the 80`s either. Only 1 in the 90`s and 1 in 2000`s. So combined the PAC and little 1o have only won 5 national football titles in last 35 years. This ain`t helping your case, Guido.

During the 80's the SUC won 1 title, during the 90's the SUC won 3 titles, then they paid more for the BCS system to get any of their teams into the final including the lowest ranked snorefest that was Alabama-LSU part two. Full playoff system would expose the weakness of your "conference", kind of like this years CWS where the SUC team was outscored 11-1 in the two game series loss. Pat Summitt is the best thing your SUC ass "conference" has, Florida won a legitimate title in men's basketball and UCLA still has more championships than your entire "conference" combined. Princeton, Yale and Notre Dame all have more football titles than any SUC school. At least Alabama has a long history of winning, but, you didn't attend that school so "Yay conference!"

 

[Anonymous]

During the 80's the SUC won 1 title, during the 90's the SUC won 3 titles, then they paid more for the BCS system to get any of their teams into the final including the lowest ranked snorefest that was Alabama-LSU part two. Full playoff system would expose the weakness of your "conference", kind of like this years CWS where the SUC team was outscored 11-1 in the two game series loss. Pat Summitt is the best thing your SUC ass "conference" has, Florida won a legitimate title in men's basketball and UCLA still has more championships than your entire "conference" combined. Princeton, Yale and Notre Dame all have more football titles than any SUC school. At least Alabama has a long history of winning, but, you didn't attend that school so "Yay conference!"

Hey Guido, just answer the question being asked on the thread that you keep posting on.. Your mindless banter and off topic spin tactics only exacerbate your SEC envy. Repeating that that you know the PAC sucks in football and that you are a SEC hater does not make your confernece good. You obviously accept that your conference sucks in football and can`t win big out of conference games vs top ranked teams. you are a moron but are fun to laugh at.

 

[Anonymous]

During the 80's the SUC won 1 title, during the 90's the SUC won 3 titles, then they paid more for the BCS system to get any of their teams into the final including the lowest ranked snorefest that was Alabama-LSU part two. Full playoff system would expose the weakness of your "conference", kind of like this years CWS where the SUC team was outscored 11-1 in the two game series loss. Pat Summitt is the best thing your SUC ass "conference" has, Florida won a legitimate title in men's basketball and UCLA still has more championships than your entire "conference" combined. Princeton, Yale and Notre Dame all have more football titles than any SUC school. At least Alabama has a long history of winning, but, you didn't attend that school so "Yay conference!"

So what`s your dumb dumb? 80`s and 90`s pre-BCS pac won 1 title and SEC won 4. What part of 4/1 ratio in favor of the SEC don`t you understand? Again, the PAC and of course the little 1o both sucked even before the bcs.

 

[Anonymous]

So what`s your dumb dumb? 80`s and 90`s pre-BCS pac won 1 title and SEC won 4. What part of 4/1 ratio in favor of the SEC don`t you understand? Again, the PAC and of course the little 1o both sucked even before the bcs.

Because before the BCS started the PAC 12 had 1 and the SUC had 2 football titles in the 80's and 90's. Dominating! Yay "conference"! Give yourself another participation ribbon for jumping on the "conference" bandwagon!

 

[Anonymous]

Because before the BCS started the PAC 12 had 1 and the SUC had 2 football titles in the 80's and 90's. Dominating! Yay "conference"! Give yourself another participation ribbon for jumping on the "conference" bandwagon!

I LMFAO at you, guido. Here is a look how far off your perception is from reality. PAC football is far inferior to SEC football.

Sorry Pac-12, our findings favor the SEC, big time.
•The SEC has an all-time record of 111-76-10 (152-107-13 when you add MU-CU) and a winning percentage of .589 in head-to-head matchups against Pac-12 teams.
•The LSU Tigers own the Pac-12 Conference in football. LSU has the best head-to-head record of any SEC or Pac-12 team. The Tigers are 22-4 overall with a winning percentage of .846 against the Pac-12. Wonder how many National Championships LSU could have won if it had joined the Pac-12 instead of the SEC?
•The Ole Miss Rebels have never played a Pac-12 team in football. Vandy has played one, Kentucky and South Carolina each played two, and MSU has played three games against opponents from the Pac-12.
•USC has a 22-11-1 record against SEC football teams and a winning percentage of .662. Best by far of the Pac-12 schools in matchups against the SEC. Two other Pac-12 teams have winning records against the SEC – Stanford and UCLA. Cal is stuck on .500.
•The Kentucky Wildcats have never lost a football game to a Pac-12 opponent. Yes, Big Blue is 2-0 all-time against the Pac-12. In both victories, the Wildcats stuck it to the Beavers from Oregon State.
•Tennessee has played the most football games against Pac-12 opponents, a total of 35 games. Mizzou (30 not counting CU games) is next, followed by Texas A&M (29), LSU (26), Alabama (23), and Georgia (17).
•Alabama has the only winning record among SEC teams against the USC Trojans. Bama has taken 5 out of 7 games from the Boys from Troy dating back to 1938.
•In 1990, Colorado’s 11-1-1 National Championship season was marred by a 31-31 tie against Tennessee in the season opener and the Five Downs Game against Missouri during the sixth week. In the Five Downs Game, the Buffs were allowed an extra down to score a touchdown and win on the game’s final play.
•The SEC holds a 16-3-1 record against the two Arizona schools, an 18-6-1 record against the two Oregon schools, and a 19-3 record against the two Washington schools. Yep, that’s 53-12-5 or a .793 winning percentage against half of the Pac-12.
•The very first meeting between SEC and Pac-12 teams took place on October 21, 1921. That day Texas A&M beat Arizona 17-13.
•The second meeting between future members of the SEC and Pac-12 was on Christmas Day back in 1924. USC beat Mizzou 20-7 in the Los Angeles Christmas Festival Bowl, giving the Tigers its only loss that year. Missouri returned the favor in 1976 by beating the Trojans 46-25 at the Coliseum. USC finished 11-1 that year, #2 in the final polls behind Pitt.
•In 1926, Alabama became the first southern college football team to be invited to play in the Rose Bowl. The Tide beat the Washington Huskies 20-19 in its first game against a future Pac-12 opponent. Bama is 4-0 all-time against UW.

 

[Anonymous]

Because before the BCS started the PAC 12 had 1 and the SUC had 2 football titles in the 80's and 90's. Dominating! Yay "conference"! Give yourself another participation ribbon for jumping on the "conference" bandwagon!

Great points. I am sure by now you realize you are wasting your time (as I am) reading this garble. This is a guy who went to a commuter community college who was not accepted to another "conference" school, and is on fire trying to make those of us who love our schools angry. It doesn't work. Even if we went to Indiana, we would love our school, and our tailgates as well as the team. He doesn't have a team to root for. Period. End of discussion. Just think-------think clearly-----he likes Alabama as much as Auburn. Total JOKE! That is like an OSU fan rooting for Michigan. The real world (the one he does not live in) does not work that way. That is why he is like he is. Get a grip and ignore this idiot. He went to school at a place you have NEVER heard of. He got rejected from a PAC12 or Big10 school and is super angry and cannot let go. It is hilarious. Poor sap has NO tailgate to go to!!

 

[Anonymous]

I LMFAO at you, guido. Here is a look how far off your perception is from reality. PAC football is far inferior to SEC football.

Sorry Pac-12, our findings favor the SEC, big time.
•The SEC has an all-time record of 111-76-10 (152-107-13 when you add MU-CU) and a winning percentage of .589 in head-to-head matchups against Pac-12 teams.
•The LSU Tigers own the Pac-12 Conference in football. LSU has the best head-to-head record of any SEC or Pac-12 team. The Tigers are 22-4 overall with a winning percentage of .846 against the Pac-12. Wonder how many National Championships LSU could have won if it had joined the Pac-12 instead of the SEC?
•The Ole Miss Rebels have never played a Pac-12 team in football. Vandy has played one, Kentucky and South Carolina each played two, and MSU has played three games against opponents from the Pac-12.
•USC has a 22-11-1 record against SEC football teams and a winning percentage of .662. Best by far of the Pac-12 schools in matchups against the SEC. Two other Pac-12 teams have winning records against the SEC – Stanford and UCLA. Cal is stuck on .500.
•The Kentucky Wildcats have never lost a football game to a Pac-12 opponent. Yes, Big Blue is 2-0 all-time against the Pac-12. In both victories, the Wildcats stuck it to the Beavers from Oregon State.
•Tennessee has played the most football games against Pac-12 opponents, a total of 35 games. Mizzou (30 not counting CU games) is next, followed by Texas A&M (29), LSU (26), Alabama (23), and Georgia (17).
•Alabama has the only winning record among SEC teams against the USC Trojans. Bama has taken 5 out of 7 games from the Boys from Troy dating back to 1938.
•In 1990, Colorado’s 11-1-1 National Championship season was marred by a 31-31 tie against Tennessee in the season opener and the Five Downs Game against Missouri during the sixth week. In the Five Downs Game, the Buffs were allowed an extra down to score a touchdown and win on the game’s final play.
•The SEC holds a 16-3-1 record against the two Arizona schools, an 18-6-1 record against the two Oregon schools, and a 19-3 record against the two Washington schools. Yep, that’s 53-12-5 or a .793 winning percentage against half of the Pac-12.
•The very first meeting between SEC and Pac-12 teams took place on October 21, 1921. That day Texas A&M beat Arizona 17-13.
•The second meeting between future members of the SEC and Pac-12 was on Christmas Day back in 1924. USC beat Mizzou 20-7 in the Los Angeles Christmas Festival Bowl, giving the Tigers its only loss that year. Missouri returned the favor in 1976 by beating the Trojans 46-25 at the Coliseum. USC finished 11-1 that year, #2 in the final polls behind Pitt.
•In 1926, Alabama became the first southern college football team to be invited to play in the Rose Bowl. The Tide beat the Washington Huskies 20-19 in its first game against a future Pac-12 opponent. Bama is 4-0 all-time against UW.

who cares? obviously someone with no life that spouts stupid college football facts on a GSK company board. To think this idiot went and researched a;; this crap is pathetic.

 

[Anonymous]

Great points. I am sure by now you realize you are wasting your time (as I am) reading this garble. This is a guy who went to a commuter community college who was not accepted to another "conference" school, and is on fire trying to make those of us who love our schools angry. It doesn't work. Even if we went to Indiana, we would love our school, and our tailgates as well as the team. He doesn't have a team to root for. Period. End of discussion. Just think-------think clearly-----he likes Alabama as much as Auburn. Total JOKE! That is like an OSU fan rooting for Michigan. The real world (the one he does not live in) does not work that way. That is why he is like he is. Get a grip and ignore this idiot. He went to school at a place you have NEVER heard of. He got rejected from a PAC12 or Big10 school and is super angry and cannot let go. It is hilarious. Poor sap has NO tailgate to go to!!

Whatever guido. You argue everything accept the truth about how bad the Pac and little 1o really sucks in football. hee hee

 

[Anonymous]

Whatever guido. You argue everything accept the truth about how bad the Pac and little 1o really sucks in football. hee hee

Excellent retort BandwagonBoy! Yay "conference"! Print yourself another participation ribbon!

 

[Anonymous]

Excellent retort BandwagonBoy! Yay "conference"! Print yourself another participation ribbon!

What has the Pac done on the actual playing field vs ranked out of conference teams over the past several years that would even warrant a discussion on them being good? that`s what i thought...... Nothing. USC your flagship program has taken a severe blow and will be down for awhile. Oregon is nothing more than fluff rolling up gaudy stats vs very weak teams and has never beaten a really good out of conference team. Stanford is a good underdog story of a long time beaten down program that can now win in a very weak conference. The rest of the Pac is just down right pathetic and laughable. hahahahahaha

 

[Anonymous]

What has the Pac done on the actual playing field vs ranked out of conference teams over the past several years that would even warrant a discussion on them being good? that`s what i thought...... Nothing. USC your flagship program has taken a severe blow and will be down for awhile. Oregon is nothing more than fluff rolling up gaudy stats vs very weak teams and has never beaten a really good out of conference team. Stanford is a good underdog story of a long time beaten down program that can now win in a very weak conference. The rest of the Pac is just down right pathetic and laughable. hahahahahaha

But it is still the Conference of Champions with more legitimate national titles, including this year's UCLA beatdown of Missedissippi State in the CWS, than any other conference. Add to that UCLA has more legitimate national championships by itself than the SEC, and the fact that UCLA's basketball record under John Wooden is recognized as the most significant athletic achievement in any sport at any level and your entire "SEC is awesome in the BCS" rant is entirely insignificant and meaningless. One thing you do have in common with the SEC and Pac 12 is that you clearly never attended classes at any of their 24 schools. You're so thirsty for something outside of your community college intramural soccer league you had to bandwagon an entire conference to get self esteem. You're funny!

 

[Anonymous]

What has the Pac done on the actual playing field vs ranked out of conference teams over the past several years that would even warrant a discussion on them being good? that`s what i thought...... Nothing. USC your flagship program has taken a severe blow and will be down for awhile. Oregon is nothing more than fluff rolling up gaudy stats vs very weak teams and has never beaten a really good out of conference team. Stanford is a good underdog story of a long time beaten down program that can now win in a very weak conference. The rest of the Pac is just down right pathetic and laughable. hahahahahaha

Hey Bandwagonboy, Game Day's on my campus tomorrow so here's my plan: tonight watch #1 ranked UW volleyball against Arizona, eat dinner and start partying until 3AM when the line forms at the ESPN set, cameras roll at 6 AM Pacific with free food, lunch and game time against our hated rivals. Here's the kicker "conference" boy, win or lose-and we all know a win would be a huge upset-I still will wear only purple (black tomorrow) and we will never chant PAC12PAC12Pac12 because that's stupid! I wish you could see my campus tomorrow morning on TV but I know at 9AM you'll be rolling up to the little elementary school across the street from whatever college desperately needed your tuition so you can gear up for your weekly coed flag football game, I know you're the star (have you found those hot little vests with velcro flags or are you still using a snot filled handkerchief on one side and a filthy hand towel on the other. Sorry, you're probably still playing touch because rags are too expensive.) I know you're going by the library for your alumni chess club tournament before you get home, switch into your "conference" gear and turn on whatever overmatched, pointless, middle-of-the-season "conference" tripe you can find. I'll bet you cry yourself to sleep every Saturday night, not only because you can only get laid by relatives but also because you know these stupid threads on CP are your only outlet to spew your "conference" BS and we all know it's BS. Chant this beeyotch: Band-Wa-Gon, Band-Wa-Gon, Band-Wa-Gon!

 

[Anonymous]

Best post in the history of his forum. Bar none.
This weird kid has nothing to watch on TV and no team to root for. No brats, beer with fellow alumni, no kegs, zippo.
Something very serious happened to him at a major conf. school (other than the SUC) or his mother in a frat house. He is so angry and sad at the same time. It is so funny, it makes me feel better even when my alma mater loses! We don't go home in tears, we continue drinking and laughing then hit the bars! This guy is sitting home on the ESPN website tracking scores of conferences and posting! LOL! I hope he keeps it up, cause when I read them I feel soooooooooooooooooo good about my school. Win or lose we have fun. (more fun when we win of course, but this sap has no happy days!)

 

[Anonymous]

ps..................I LOVE the name "Bandwagon Boy" Perfect! If it were the late 70's he would be screaming about UCLA hoops. Hilarious.

 

[Anonymous]

Go blue go.

 

[Anonymous]

But it is still the Conference of Champions with more legitimate national titles, including this year's UCLA beatdown of Missedissippi State in the CWS, than any other conference. Add to that UCLA has more legitimate national championships by itself than the SEC, and the fact that UCLA's basketball record under John Wooden is recognized as the most significant athletic achievement in any sport at any level and your entire "SEC is awesome in the BCS" rant is entirely insignificant and meaningless. One thing you do have in common with the SEC and Pac 12 is that you clearly never attended classes at any of their 24 schools. You're so thirsty for something outside of your community college intramural soccer league you had to bandwagon an entire conference to get self esteem. You're funny!

Your math skills don`t speak well for the PAC and makes you look like the total moron that you are. I know it would be impossible for you with your limited brain cells to figure, but let me know if you can figure out the PAC vs SEC head to head football record.

 

[Anonymous]

To a first time poster on this silly string, I must wonder why it is on a pharma board. Someone must be very bored and trying to stir up on-line arguments just for the sake of it. Oh well, to each his/her own.

I CAN answer the initial post about if the SEC can "8 Peat" as is questioned. It appears very unlikely at this point due to the highly probable sanction against Alabama that will eliminate their 2012 NC. The player has admitted an awful lot, and the NC will be "erased form the history books" forever. So, in a nutshell, if they win one this year, it will the their first for a new string. Then in 2014 we can talk about a "2 Peat." It is now predicted that the NCAA is 90% sure the 2012 title is gone.

 

[Anonymous]

To a first time poster on this silly string, I must wonder why it is on a pharma board. Someone must be very bored and trying to stir up on-line arguments just for the sake of it. Oh well, to each his/her own.

I CAN answer the initial post about if the SEC can "8 Peat" as is questioned. It appears very unlikely at this point due to the highly probable sanction against Alabama that will eliminate their 2012 NC. The player has admitted an awful lot, and the NC will be "erased form the history books" forever. So, in a nutshell, if they win one this year, it will the their first for a new string. Then in 2014 we can talk about a "2 Peat." It is now predicted that the NCAA is 90% sure the 2012 title is gone.

I like when you play misty for me. Play it softly though.

 

[Anonymous]

Best post in the history of his forum. Bar none.
This weird kid has nothing to watch on TV and no team to root for. No brats, beer with fellow alumni, no kegs, zippo.
Something very serious happened to him at a major conf. school (other than the SUC) or his mother in a frat house. He is so angry and sad at the same time. It is so funny, it makes me feel better even when my alma mater loses! We don't go home in tears, we continue drinking and laughing then hit the bars! This guy is sitting home on the ESPN website tracking scores of conferences and posting! LOL! I hope he keeps it up, cause when I read them I feel soooooooooooooooooo good about my school. Win or lose we have fun. (more fun when we win of course, but this sap has no happy days!)

The SEC still boasts the No. 1 team in the nation in Alabama and 40 percent of the AP Top 10. It's home to seven straight BCS titles won by four different programs and routinely shines on the game's biggest stages.

Until a team knocks the SEC off its pedestal, knocking the SEC accomplishes nothing and only makes the person being critical look desperate. Ivan Maisel ESPN

On top of it all, you spend your Friday night`s on this site. LMFAO, what a total loser. "This wierd Kid' has nothing better to do on his friday night except chat on an anonymous board about the SEC. hahahahahahahahaha. looooooserville

 

[Anonymous]

Ever heard of time zones loser? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Pacific time little guy.
Get a progie and a life. 2012 is gone. NC taken away. Coaches hand green bills to players. Done done. Tostado. LMAO AND ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA