anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Hey numb nuts for brains, Xeljanz does not have indication for Psoriasis..
PSA is 15% share while Otesla is 10% .
First 3yrs Otesla didnt even do anything but create diarrhea , they made fortune w Psoriasis.
2.5 billion bro with RA PSA so no wonder BMS didnt want keep your sorry weak efficacy drug & outcasted it to Amgen
Don't believe our numbers. We define the "market" the way Pfizer wants to minimize IC payouts. Do a little research outside of our environment and look at what's really going on. Facts:
Xeljanz had indications in the biggest market(RA), PSA and UC(huge) and has been on the market since 2012 and in 9 years sales are now at 2.24billon a year (go look at our 10k).
Otezla has indications in PSO and PSA only. Added together, these aren't equal to RA. They have been on the market since 2014 and in 7 years sales are now at 2.20 billion a year (go look at their 10k).
Look at growth rate and tell me where you think things are going. They have a strong hold on the drug that does not harm so start with it. We have a solid hold on the first JAK, the one that is getting rapidly replaced by the newer, cleaner JAKs.