What's going on?

Quote
That's right. It's a good first device job if you can get by on a 100k package while you wait for something better to come along. You just have to be ok with finding a new job in a year since that's what usually happens. Don't expect any training and prepare to be told you suck
 






anonymous said:
Here a question to ask. Why are there no human studies? The product has been on the market for seven years. If it worked they would have done some studies.
Acell reps just make ridiculous unsubstantiated claims. These are the worst reps in the industry. I would never hire anyone that worked for Acell. You've been warned.
Click to expand...

Money, honey.
 






add me to the list of people leavin. The mass exodus continues my friends. My New Years resolution is to find a company that doesn't treat the reps like garbage. Anything is better than this place.
 












don't worry about my name partner. I speak the truth. Facts: Sales are on the decline (check the sales numbers), most reps make less than $100k, no real data, turnover is triple that of other med device companies, the leadership is in disarray (searching for yet another CEO) and they tried to sell the company recently to "cut the loss" (read the court documents).

My name is Truth. I shall set you free.
 












anonymous said:
don't worry about my name partner. I speak the truth. Facts: Sales are on the decline (check the sales numbers), most reps make less than $100k, no real data, turnover is triple that of other med device companies, the leadership is in disarray (searching for yet another CEO) and they tried to sell the company recently to "cut the loss" (read the court documents).

My name is Truth. I shall set you free.
Click to expand...
 






anonymous said:
don't worry about my name partner. I speak the truth. Facts: Sales are on the decline (check the sales numbers), most reps make less than $100k, no real data, turnover is triple that of other med device companies, the leadership is in disarray (searching for yet another CEO) and they tried to sell the company recently to "cut the loss" (read the court documents).

My name is Truth. I shall set you free.
Click to expand...

interesting. that's a whole lot of "facts". i'm unclear how you would have access to such "facts," unless you're in finance? the last i checked the company has never had a year where its sales numbers were lower than the year prior.
 






anonymous said:
don't worry about my name partner. I speak the truth. Facts: Sales are on the decline (check the sales numbers), most reps make less than $100k, no real data, turnover is triple that of other med device companies, the leadership is in disarray (searching for yet another CEO) and they tried to sell the company recently to "cut the loss" (read the court documents).

My name is Truth. I shall set you free.
Click to expand...

For a guy/gal named "Truth," I'm unclear as to the source or accuracy of your "facts". Bottom line is there is no way unless you work in the Finance department you know what every one of us makes, and last time I checked the company has never had a year where it had less revenue than the year prior.
 






anonymous said:
For a guy/gal named "Truth," I'm unclear as to the source or accuracy of your "facts". Bottom line is there is no way unless you work in the Finance department you know what every one of us makes, and last time I checked the company has never had a year where it had less revenue than the year prior.
Click to expand...

Fear not those who speak the truth. The truth shall set you free.

Everyone knows the vast majority of reps make less than ~$100k. I know what many of my collegues sell each month around the country. We talk. You can't hide the truth forever. Me not so smart but me do math using fingers real good, mister.

I guess you find 3% growth for a med device company a good thing? Ouch. not sure what's more embarrassing, the 3% growth or that someone is trying to justify it as a success. I certainly hope you don't work in finance.
 


















New product launch with no new studies (technically there are no old studies either), no new "anecdotal" presentation cases (other than old cases that are NOW considered on label) and its MORE expensive (compared to the same product thats un-fenistrated)? Seems like a recipe for successful adventures in Value Analysis world.
 






Beast Mode said:
New product launch with no new studies (technically there are no old studies either), no new "anecdotal" presentation cases (other than old cases that are NOW considered on label) and its MORE expensive (compared to the same product thats un-fenistrated)? Seems like a recipe for successful adventures in Value Analysis world.
Click to expand...

Why do you think that "the old cases are NOW considered on label"?
 






Look at the cases presented in the sell sheet and powerpoint. Its PSM or PSMX sheets, not Cytal. So Im assuming they are now considered on label if they are promoting them. I guess its just a hunch, nothing more.
 












anonymous said:
this place is a joke y'all! Sinking ship!
Click to expand...

It's a shame because the product has so much potential and the company is just plain blowing it. I hope the new board is aware enough to figure out the source of the problems. It should be plainly obvious who is incompetent and trying to hide from the light. The king of excuses for his own failures blames everyone else and gets away with it. Flat sales. Never ending turnover. Uneducated sales reps and managers. Horrible culture. Off label sales. Who could be to blame??? Not this guy, he's untouchable.
 






anonymous said:
You just answered my question: "It's PSM or PSMX, not Cytal."
Click to expand...


The indications for soft tissue reinforcement in plastic/recon for Cytal actually cover all vacuume pressed surgical sheets. Therefor many of the old "off label" cases are now considered on label (mortar man, minus the use of powder). My point was the Cytal brochure is showing cases with PSMX, not Cytal. That's all.
 






The Fridge said:
The indications for soft tissue reinforcement in plastic/recon for Cytal actually cover all vacuume pressed surgical sheets. Therefor many of the old "off label" cases are now considered on label (mortar man, minus the use of powder). My point was the Cytal brochure is showing cases with PSMX, not Cytal. That's all.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but you are mistaken. You might want to check the 510ks on FDA.gov
 












Top Bottom
Back
Quote