Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
You're taking your opinion and presenting it as fact. Your comments that people are promoted by "doing useless news letters and websites that add no benefit, completing annoying, useless projects that should be completed by inside associates, beg team mates to take part in these "projects" to achieve "team involvement and interest" and are consistently trying to mentor others for the sole purpose of getting another check mark on their PM document" is your opinion of why they got promoted, as well as your opinion of the value of the things they did to get promoted. That doesn't mean there's a problem with the promotion criteria, it just means you don't like it. What you deem useless may have value to someone else and they may view it as leadership in action. Regardless of whether or not you liked what they did to get promoted, all of those things are going above and beyond what their daily job requires of them. That's why people get promoted.
You paint those who have been promoted with a broad brush, and it's obvious that you don't like them. Is that a problem with them or with you? Of course when it comes to you, you somehow NEVER did anything like that, and you EARNED your promotion, right? So, somehow, everyone except you did a bunch of BS to get promoted, and you alone are the only person who got promoted by doing thing the right way. That's not a very self-serving argument, is it?
Once again you missed the point. You must be a Director, manager, HR representative. Or recently promoted Executive Sales Rep. Damn you's stoopid!
Promotions are currently achieved by doing projects NOT individual sales. Our culture has taught us Projects = leadership, you have been trained well padre. Lilly has DISTRICT sales goals and instead of focusing on excelling on their "daily job" of sales, those wanting to get promoted separate themselves from the "pack" by perfecting the art of managing upward and doing a never ending list of projects that relate to everything but their daily job of selling. Why waste time trying to sell when doing "projects" sets me apart from team sales results? I'm not stoopid.
You incorrectly conclude disatiifaction or unhappiness. We are informing you our take on what it takes to get promoted in recent years. Nope, you don't like accepting the fact that promotions are not based on a sales rep core job of "selling" but "leadership" projects that can be put on a PM document.
Dear cheer leader of the current system or whoever you are, this perception of Lilly's current day promotion process may be hard for you to swallow but now that we think about it, "swallowing" is probably something you excel at. Did you put that on your PM document?