Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Not all of IT. Local on-site desktop staff is out-of-scope.
For a brief window... 4-10 months max. As stated, all Infrastructure within 12 months.
Not all of IT. Local on-site desktop staff is out-of-scope.
For a brief window... 4-10 months max. As stated, all Infrastructure within 12 months.
Not so. It was clearly stated that local Field IT who service desktops and instruments in-house and Field IT that services the physicians and clients (Care 360) are not in the scope of the out sourcing. This was re-stated and clarified during the question and answer session.
I thought the funny part was when he said he has been through this before.
What company outsourced him?
I think what he meant was that he has DONE this many times before.What company outsourced him?
I think what he meant was that he has DONE this many times before.
Quest IT is 6% of cost for the company. What I heard was: "WE have no idea how to manage IT professionals and cost. We should be managing a Cracker Barrel. So, we are gonna send it off shore where they have no clue either, but we can blame them".
Out sourcing/Off shoring always smacked of incompetent senior mgmt to me. You are admitting that we can't handle this "thecmology shtuff" so...we will give the keys to our CORE DATA to someone else.
Not so. It was clearly stated that local Field IT who service desktops and instruments in-house and Field IT that services the physicians and clients (Care 360) are not in the scope of the out sourcing. This was re-stated and clarified during the question and answer session.
Yes, its just 6%, but at LH it's 3% (supposedly), and that's what they are benchmarking against. And they are actually growing the business while DGX is shrinking. Taking 3% off your bottom line is actually a big deal.
It was tongue-in-cheek. Pretty sure everybody knows that SR and JH are experts at ripping a company apart. I could be wrong but didn't JH even talk about that at the April meeting as if it was something to be proud of?
I was being sarcastic. It's what made it so funny that JH thinks "he has been through this before".
The funny part was when they decided they needed to replace the systems from the 60s &70s.
He's no lawyer. Anybody with half a legal-brain would know that the lawsuits would make the severance payouts look like peanuts. As soon as one person files a lawsuit, there will be 1500 more jumping on board, so Quest needs to do the right thing and pay people for and what's been outlined in Quest policy, and what they've earned.
Before you accuse me of not "earning" anything, I've personally spent hundreds of hours working on weekends, after-hours and away from my family for Quest. I'm salaried, so one could argue that I don't not get paid for these hours regardless of what is expected from a salaried FTE...I've gone above and beyond. If someone thinks differently, I challenge them to explain why. I'll work circles around that person because I'm confident in my skills and know that any failures of IT have absolutely nothing to do with me or my work.
BTW - I'm off today working on my own DR plan, so keep snarky comments about being on a forum during work hours to yourself.