anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
hey loser MRG or Zonie, why don’t you try selling it or even better idea go get a GPO contract. What ever happened with Health Trust?
You are not on vacation, you are going to your Zone Meeting for work. This isn't fun and games, it's to become better. You clearly need the work due to the poor performance you all have turned in regarding Voyant. We have the plan in place, it's time for you all to learn to execute that plan and if you follow the guidelines we have set you will be successful.
the zone Meeting was waste of time. They really think it’s a talk track that will sell Voyant
Someone please explain the clinical benefits of this product
Management here is struggling to fill time and I like to call it job justification. Any of the ZM’s look at these products as me too and will admit it behind closed doors. They aren’t going to spend 3-4 hrs on how to insert/use a fucking trocar, how to unroll an Alexis, how to use a clip applied, or how to use laparoscopic scissors. That leaves the Voyant. This company isn’t innovative, they’ve come out w/ 1-2 new products in the last 10 years (Sorry Said, making a wound retractor a different color and saying it’s intended for Orthopedic procedures isn’t innovative), thus our r*****s in management are scrambling to fill time at these meetings........tell me I’m wrong.
Full Disclosure, I do not work for Applied Medical and I do not work for a competitor of yours. A colleague of mine pointed me to this site after we had an interesting conversation about why vendors are pushing these products into our hospitals. I am familiar with Applied Medical, and I will reserve my comments because I do not believe in bashing one’s products. Everyone has a job to do and who am i to stop you from doing your jobs? What I find laughable, if I am understanding everything correctly, is that Applied Medical believes that by having us sign off on a product as “acceptable,” it will somehow force our hands into using your product or hold us accountable if we don’t want to use it after the trial is over? I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but no vendor form with a surgeon’s signature on it would ever hold up in my CMO’s office, a VAT committee, or a court of law. What makes Applied Medical think this?
Full Disclosure, I do not work for Applied Medical and I do not work for a competitor of yours. A colleague of mine pointed me to this site after we had an interesting conversation about why vendors are pushing these products into our hospitals. I am familiar with Applied Medical, and I will reserve my comments because I do not believe in bashing one’s products. Everyone has a job to do and who am i to stop you from doing your jobs? What I find laughable, if I am understanding everything correctly, is that Applied Medical believes that by having us sign off on a product as “acceptable,” it will somehow force our hands into using your product or hold us accountable if we don’t want to use it after the trial is over? I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but no vendor form with a surgeon’s signature on it would ever hold up in my CMO’s office, a VAT committee, or a court of law. What makes Applied Medical think this?
out of curiosity how do you know the comp changed? And if you really did know it, you would realize the reps take a larger hit with new Comp plan.
I rather make no money and stay at home than watch these drunk sexist managers make a killing because all they did was raise the prices.
Oh and as for voyant, make more money selling hernia balloons and takes less time.