Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
You are very confused. Why are you bringing up BMP??? What does that have to do with pdgf? And BMP is not a very good product. In a perfect world it would be fantastic, but it has to be used with collagen instead of a bone graft so there is no way to maintain space to allow the BMP to do it's job. That leads to poor results at more than 10 times the price of Gem. Infuse is not even a part of this discussion.
And Emdogain does have loyal customers and it is less expensive but that doesn't mean it works. It's actually a terrible product. It doesn't exhance bone formation at all. You do get clinical attachment gains in perio defects but that doesn't fix the problem.
Now I do admit that Gem is in trouble as well as Osteohealth as a whole, but let's talk facts here, not your brand of koolaid. Gem is a superior product to anything out on the market but it isn't being used enough due to Osteohealth's screw ups.
But BMP IS part of the discussion because it is another therapy available. You say GEM should be used in every grafting procedure...then why not BMP or Emdogain? Everyone knows whether it is PDGF, BMP, or Emdogain that you need to buy a seperate bone carrier. You honestly think the crappy fine particle TCP in GEM is maintaining space any better than the Infuse collagen sponge. Either one needs a seperate bone carrier. There is much more clinical data on these products then GEM and PDGF. Customers will not spend $299 or $2000 to put either in an extraction or simple grafting case. Sounds like YOU are drinking too much of the Kool-Aid.
And YES..GEM and Osteohealth are both "in trouble".