I listened to the call and was embarrassed. The spin of the % growth was borderline pathetic but the top line revenue number of $1.9mm in sales says it all. And the 'warning' that Q4 could be worse due to the use of the copay program? So we have that to look forward to. Geez
I listened to the call and was embarrassed. The spin of the % growth was borderline pathetic but the top line revenue number of $1.9mm in sales says it all. And the 'warning' that Q4 could be worse due to the use of the copay program? So we have that to look forward to. Geez
I have an interview with this company! Should I run from this job. Concerned it won’t be around in three months! Is it hard to make bonus!I listened to the call and was embarrassed. The spin of the % growth was borderline pathetic but the top line revenue number of $1.9mm in sales says it all. And the 'warning' that Q4 could be worse due to the use of the copay program? So we have that to look forward to. Geez
We'll be around, but it depends on the role. If it's a Home office role, know what you'e getting into. It's a top down driven company. Who's on first? The struggles we're having are leading to a lot of finger pointing and whispering already and nobody has the answers-which is really only what Peter wants to hear-which changes based on who he talked to last They are all really nice people but every one of them are there because they know the other person-not because they are qualified. It seems counter-intuitive but person x is connected to person y, but not person z, so person x is nice to person z but is blaming him/her for the problems. Not the their face though-because we're a "nice company." It's a mess and it's not going to get better. The stock is tanking and the board is asking some hard questions.I have an interview with this company! Should I run from this job. Concerned it won’t be around in three months! Is it hard to make bonus!
