Las Vegas CRM













Max was recruited to be DM when CF came on board. You make it sound like Max was there first. He came after CF. he wanted his cut was denied and gathered evidence. Settle that shit before someone goes to jail.

To be clear...when you say Max "came after CF", you mean as the manager over that area. Max had been working for BIO in a different capacity before CF and friends came on board, and then he was moved over to that managerial role by BIO. I think that was what you meant, but it looks like the other guy was confused a little....maybe that clears it up.
 












Max was recruited to be DM when CF came on board. You make it sound like Max was there first. He came after CF. he wanted his cut was denied and gathered evidence. Settle that shit before someone goes to jail.

Not even close, but then again, its CafePharma. Max was with Bio long before Western was devised. His "cut" was whatever was promised to him and then not delivered.

Why is everyone surprised with a reaction to a chronic CF/PE management style? When you over promise and under deliver, consequences follow. That and when you treat people like garbage uncontrollable reactions are bound to happen. Careers, lives, livelihoods etc have been destroyed both on the clinical and professional side because of certain individuals and their business practices and the wheels of justice will have their pound of flesh.

Settle or Jail? Two different things here. You really thing Bio will attempt to litigate their way out? That would be awesome to get all the docs, reps, managers etc on the stand. Discovery would be priceless. The latter is criminal, and inevitable.
 
























FACT: Biotronik is the only CRM company not currently under OIG investigation for business practices.

FACT: Fidelis and recalls give companies bad names.

FACT: The days of paying off docs ARE over - no more week-long pharma trips to Cancun.

FACT: The days of FDA required after-market registries are JUST GETTING STARTED thanks to the recalls because it sheds light on new product performance trends. The docs who participate are going to be reimbursed for their time and "commitment to keeping the marketplace safe".

Now, if you have a problem with docs getting paid to participate in registries - you should take it up with your regional manager. Explain it to him / her, and find out their perspective. Maybe he was born with his umbilical cord wrapped around his neck too and you guys can agree.


!!!! (Already) First FACT is fallicy, Buckwheat.
won`t even mess with the remaining " facts " you cite.
 
























nice to see Bio assigned staff to BS on cafepharma LOL... is that why more depositions are coming dumbass?

depositions are questions to get to the bottom of somebody's accusations. no harm no foul. however, did you catch some of the posts elsewhere? the FDA is visiting the HQ of another CRM thinktank. DOJ is doing their job with Bio. It could be called "vetting" which happens from time to time when small companies or individuals rise quickly (see Mr. Z of facebook).

but, if you google medtronic, st jude and bsx in regards to DOJ investigations we will all see that those 3 companies paid major fines because of ACTUAL findings versus the depositions you speak of ...........chump. so dumbass is a word fit for you......and you only.
 






To vet was originally a horse-racing term, referring to the requirement that a horse be checked for health and soundness by a veterinarian before being allowed to race. Thus, it has taken the general meaning "to check".[2]

It is a figurative contraction of veterinarian, which originated in the mid-17th century. The colloquial abbreviation dates to the 1860s; the verb form of the word, meaning "to treat an animal", came a few decades later—according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest known usage is 1891[3]—and was applied primarily in a horse-racing context ("He vetted the stallion before the race", "You should vet that horse before he races", etc.).

By the early 1900s, vet had begun to be used as a synonym for evaluate, especially in the context of searching for flaws
 


















To vet was originally a horse-racing term, referring to the requirement that a horse be checked for health and soundness by a veterinarian before being allowed to race. Thus, it has taken the general meaning "to check".[2]

It is a figurative contraction of veterinarian, which originated in the mid-17th century. The colloquial abbreviation dates to the 1860s; the verb form of the word, meaning "to treat an animal", came a few decades later—according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest known usage is 1891[3]—and was applied primarily in a horse-racing context ("He vetted the stallion before the race", "You should vet that horse before he races", etc.).

By the early 1900s, vet had begun to be used as a synonym for evaluate, especially in the context of searching for flaws

Gay.