anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
She said it was $2k and was corrected by DO’D. She was blatantly inflating the facts to grandstand and get her optic. Did she even ask a question? It’s pure theatre.
The difference is that in the US Truvada is still patent protected. That will end next year and Truvada will cost similar to what it does in Australia. Case closed. Next.
My point is that the cost to the patient is typically very low. That’s the way the private/public payor system in the US works. No one is paying 2K and it’s unfair to say so.
Of course AOC won’t point that out b/c it doesn’t serve her purpose of grandstanding.
Ummmmm okay! He told her the price was $1,780 instead of $2,000. This is really the best argument you could come up with? You’d have been better off not replying if that’s your best response. $1,780 or $2K versus $8 is still ridiculous. At the end of the day the drug is being paid by some entity at an egregious price difference for Americans versus Australians.
AOC hit him between the eyes with her VALID point and his explanation was extremely weak. Call it grand standing but I call it a damn good question which your CEO provided a sorry answer. What’s unfair is pricing a product 220X more for a US citizen than a patient in another country. If it was $25 versus $8 it would still be unfair but to price a product at $1,780. Really? Mic dropped! Next!