Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Ok good. I get it, MCOT rules. now that the whole MT vs AT is over. But back to the first argument. LW or CN? Mednet?
Does not matter. They will all be bankrupt soon.
Ok good. I get it, MCOT rules. now that the whole MT vs AT is over. But back to the first argument. LW or CN? Mednet?
The reimbursement services department is a joke. Management promotes all of their friends to pointless positions(i.e. Caine D)--Ann's friend, and Dawn U--these individuals have absolutely no education or experience in this industry. I do not think working in a flower shop prior to coming to Cardionet constitutes experience. Noone does their job in that department, the reps sit on the internet all day or on the personal calls and then they wonder why there are so many patient errors.
Look what happens when individuals who do not have the educational background or experience are placed in positions they are not qualified for---Peggy U---need I say more?
Lifewatch and Cardionet better look out for irhythm. Not only have 5 LW reps switched over to them in the past 8 months, but the whole management team came from LW! thats funny. They have a great selling approach and will be taking ALOT of accounts.
When your last greatest auto-trigger was ran through the MIT/AHA database, you had a remarkable 80% success rate for detecting Afib. CardioNet is 100% accurate with MIT/AHA database. Do you need a study to show that you will miss 1 out of every 5 patients with AF? 1 out of 5, let me say it again, 1 out of 5!! Not a great success rate is it? You guys are simple to sell against. I would even take the 72 hours over your 5 minutes.
Proof is federal submission for algorithm approval for King of hearts which is what all of you butt monkeys use for comparison. So what if we do not "directly" measure atrial activity, we still are close to 100% accurate. MD's do not care, only idiot reps grasping for anything they can. I only show MIT comparisons when a loser rep tries to discount our algorithm. Slam dunk!This is a false statement. Where is your proof? You still cannot directly measure atiral activity!
Proof is federal submission for algorithm approval for King of hearts which is what all of you butt monkeys use for comparison. So what if we do not "directly" measure atrial activity, we still are close to 100% accurate. MD's do not care, only idiot reps grasping for anything they can. I only show MIT comparisons when a loser rep tries to discount our algorithm. Slam dunk!
CardioNet uses there own proprietary algorithm... that is why it is 100% and better than yours.
What conflict? Why would that have anything to do with having a better algorithm. Again, grasping for anything. Loser.
"Apparently there are still some "butt monkeys" getting their share of business. Although, I don't happen to be one of them. ". You are the dumbest fuck around.Who developed your algorithm? The internal conflict at Cardionet has nothing to do with the algorithm you idiot. Can't you manage more than one thought at a time? You don't have to be a butt monkey to read these threads and see that there is internal conflict running wild at Cardionet. You calling anyone a loser is a compliment. Loser implies that someone has lost. You don't hear me complaining about the state of my business, I haven't lost anything. I have not once disputed the advancements that MCOT has made in this industry and I am not grasping at anything. Just be careful when you throw out claims that may or may not be true.
How can you claim so much internal conflict at CardioNet if you do not work there?Who developed your algorithm? The internal conflict at Cardionet has nothing to do with the algorithm you idiot. Can't you manage more than one thought at a time? You don't have to be a butt monkey to read these threads and see that there is internal conflict running wild at Cardionet. You calling anyone a loser is a compliment. Loser implies that someone has lost. You don't hear me complaining about the state of my business, I haven't lost anything. I have not once disputed the advancements that MCOT has made in this industry and I am not grasping at anything. Just be careful when you throw out claims that may or may not be true.
Who developed your algorithm? The internal conflict at Cardionet has nothing to do with the algorithm you idiot. Can't you manage more than one thought at a time? You don't have to be a butt monkey to read these threads and see that there is internal conflict running wild at Cardionet. You calling anyone a loser is a compliment. Loser implies that someone has lost. You don't hear me complaining about the state of my business, I haven't lost anything. I have not once disputed the advancements that MCOT has made in this industry and I am not grasping at anything. Just be careful when you throw out claims that may or may not be true.
It matters that we stopped licensing from Mortara 2 years ago.We ( Cardionet ) licensed our algorithm from Mortara, a well respected manufacturer in the industry. What does it matter?
It matters that we stopped licensing from Mortara 2 years ago.