Absolutely. I would actually happily accept my walking papers if it meant there would be fewer of us and upper levels because that would be a good business decision geared toward greater efficiency.
I see the toll this is taking on my representatives having to "align" with so many "counterparts" that are being given different direction from their "managers". Every day I hear from my folks about an issue with someone supposed to be a partner. The things is...I could fix the egregious problem tomorrow- except for I have to "align" with the other manager who probably doesn't see the issue as is.
The structure from the top-down is fundamentally flawed at every level. It is set up or "engineered" for compliance rather than maximized for agility.
Ever wonder why it takes so long for a bold, fresh idea to take form? You have at least 4 representatives reporting to 4 (soon to be 5 DBMs) who report to 4 different CBDs (soon to be 5) who report to 4 VPs (soon to be 5); then BJ Jones; then Rich Daily.
I seriously don't think you could structure this any worse. I've tried to think of how this could be worse to no avail.
There's just not much room for creativity, innovation, or even trying something a little bold, when in fact that's exactly what we need in such a competitive environment. I'm tired of seeing the competition do something unique and then we try to copy it- only our "copy" is flawed and comes 2 years after relevancy!
Maybe naively, I'm holding out hope that Rich will take some bold actions. There is no way he could come in and say, "Well, great job leadership team. It looks like you have put all the pieces in place."
I'm just not sure I can take another year of "growing pains". Those "pains" wouldn't be so painful if we believed in the vision.
As is, the vision is so incredibly vague: "Execute Flawlessly"; "Sense of Urgency"; "Customer Focused"; "Lead as One"; "We need to align vs. being right!" That last one is my favorite...LOL! So, even if I know something is going to hurt my business, I should align? Not going to happen and I'll probably be fired anyway for not complying with the misguided strategies.
If we're not significantly further along in 6 months than we are now, I'm out- and I hope they don't back-fill my position so it will make it a little better for those still around. Until then, I will keep fighting on principle even if (especially if) that means not being "fully aligned".
Best of Luck Everyone! I wish you less UNNECESSARY change in the future!
Here's a great quote on what happens when you try to gain consensus or "align":
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/113...-abandoning-all-beliefs-principles-values-and