Reasons I love working here.

[anonymous]

You either buy into the propaganda or you dont. Some of you missed the statement that our Co has a strong defense against current allegations, in the damming article snerdly the troll pasted on a post. If you're above board and sell ethically, then you've nothing to worry about. You can drink the fear poison or not. I still love my job and know most Co's go thru cycles, litigation and many still thrive. You want to run? By all means, do. I see the glass half full. My perogative.

 

[anonymous]

You either buy into the propaganda or you dont. Some of you missed the statement that our Co has a strong defense against current allegations, in the damming article snerdly the troll pasted on a post. If you're above board and sell ethically, then you've nothing to worry about. You can drink the fear poison or not. I still love my job and know most Co's go thru cycles, litigation and many still thrive. You want to run? By all means, do. I see the glass half full. My perogative.

 

[anonymous]

This thread will quickly become. Why I loved working here. For those of you sill have on board the terror train. That’s past tense.

Read Insys lasted. Probably going to file bankruptcy. Because the legal and financial matters with the latter are overwhelming the organization. But many here are to dumb to realize it.

 

[anonymous]

I love working here so much that every morning I wet myself. 1st with wine and latter with vodka!

 

[anonymous]

You either buy into the propaganda or you dont. Some of you missed the statement that our Co has a strong defense against current allegations, in the damming article snerdly the troll pasted on a post. If you're above board and sell ethically, then you've nothing to worry about. You can drink the fear poison or not. I still love my job and know most Co's go thru cycles, litigation and many still thrive. You want to run? By all means, do. I see the glass half full. My perogative.

Many would really love to hear this so called strong defense vs the DOJ. If I’m not mistaken doesn’t the federal government have a 99% conviction rate ? You enthusiasm is intoxicating to say the least

 

[anonymous]

We're getting through this yall

 

[anonymous]

I'm so grateful to have a job. I represent a company that helps people who are struggling with an epidemically deadly disease. Our treatment option is just that, an option. Its a very good one, for most addicts. I have co-workers that are supportive and positive. That's a lot more than many people can say these days.

yes, just like good old pharma to create problems and then offer you the solution.

your post cracks me up a bit, but that is okay if you think its all good. its your world. personally, this industry just gets worse and worse, as I get older and smarter.

best to you. you seem like a good person. just know that this industry is truly a mess, and lead by narcissists.

 

[anonymous]

yes, just like good old pharma to create problems and then offer you the solution.

your post cracks me up a bit, but that is okay if you think its all good. its your world. personally, this industry just gets worse and worse, as I get older and smarter.

best to you. you seem like a good person. just know that this industry is truly a mess, and lead by narcissists.

To be fair, you can't blame RB/Indivior for creating the opioid epidemic. Purdue started it with Oxy and their criminal promotion of it: the claims it wasn't addictive based on one paragraph in a 1979 medical journal which was completely taken for gospel, the lavish trips for docs, uncapped bonuses for their reps (some made $400k a year in the 1990s), targeting small rust belt towns and helping set up pill mills, etc. The other contributers were the Xalisco boys. One tiny town in Mexico is responsible for a majority of the black tar heroin that's on the streets today. It's all there, in a book written by a damn good journalist (Dreamland).....and Suboxone is mentioned maybe twice, not in a negative light. That is how it all went down....
RB saw an opportunity and took it. I do think their reasons were financial, but Suboxone did and does help save lives. People here in the beginning mostly had altruistic motives....we wanted to help.
Sure it has potential for abuse, but the truly good doctors try to mitigate that. Unfortunately the company didn't do enough to weed out the bad docs and CLs, or they looked the other way. THAT is why Indivior is in hot water now.

 

[anonymous]

More frequent babysitting with assms. We have the worst in the business. I have work to do and it is hampered when I have to drag that incompetent bitch around.

 

[anonymous]

Another one bites the dust! Her team is ecstatic!

 

[anonymous]

To be fair, you can't blame RB/Indivior for creating the opioid epidemic. Purdue started it with Oxy and their criminal promotion of it: the claims it wasn't addictive based on one paragraph in a 1979 medical journal which was completely taken for gospel, the lavish trips for docs, uncapped bonuses for their reps (some made $400k a year in the 1990s), targeting small rust belt towns and helping set up pill mills, etc. The other contributers were the Xalisco boys. One tiny town in Mexico is responsible for a majority of the black tar heroin that's on the streets today. It's all there, in a book written by a damn good journalist (Dreamland).....and Suboxone is mentioned maybe twice, not in a negative light. That is how it all went down....
RB saw an opportunity and took it. I do think their reasons were financial, but Suboxone did and does help save lives. People here in the beginning mostly had altruistic motives....we wanted to help.
Sure it has potential for abuse, but the truly good doctors try to mitigate that. Unfortunately the company didn't do enough to weed out the bad docs and CLs, or they looked the other way. THAT is why Indivior is in hot water now.

You’re whitewashing it a bit.

1) RB from the very beginning was telling docs to tell patients to stay on Suboxone forever, saying it’s just like treating diabetes. You don’t need a medical degree to know taking any opiate (including Suboxone) for years is bad for your health. You just need common sense. Plenty of research that clearly illustrates the negative effects of long term Suboxone including low T and, ironically, increase risk of diabetes. From the very beginning there was never an exit strategy off Suboxone, and there still isn’t.

2) Suboxone didn’t get traction until the Purdue model was adopted: trade cash for drugs. This was done by recruiting docs to “build their practices” by getting X waivered so they could charge desperate patients cash to access Suboxone. And they did charge them cash, even if the patient had insurance. Then RB and docs promoted high doses (32mg / day was common) knowing full well patients were selling most of what was prescribed to 1) generate cash to pay the doctor for more Suboxone, and, 2) often buy heroin or other drugs. This model was identical to the Purdue pill mill model most everyone (RB, docs, patients) knew it.

Don’t worry, Sam Quinones is working on Dreamland, part 2, and he’ll lay out the role RB played in worsening the epidemic in easy to understand language. If he doesn’t, someone else will.

 

[anonymous]

You’re whitewashing it a bit.

1) RB from the very beginning was telling docs to tell patients to stay on Suboxone forever, saying it’s just like treating diabetes. You don’t need a medical degree to know taking any opiate (including Suboxone) for years is bad for your health. You just need common sense. Plenty of research that clearly illustrates the negative effects of long term Suboxone including low T and, ironically, increase risk of diabetes. From the very beginning there was never an exit strategy off Suboxone, and there still isn’t.

2) Suboxone didn’t get traction until the Purdue model was adopted: trade cash for drugs. This was done by recruiting docs to “build their practices” by getting X waivered so they could charge desperate patients cash to access Suboxone. And they did charge them cash, even if the patient had insurance. Then RB and docs promoted high doses (32mg / day was common) knowing full well patients were selling most of what was prescribed to 1) generate cash to pay the doctor for more Suboxone, and, 2) often buy heroin or other drugs. This model was identical to the Purdue pill mill model most everyone (RB, docs, patients) knew it.

Don’t worry, Sam Quinones is working on Dreamland, part 2, and he’ll lay out the role RB played in worsening the epidemic in easy to understand language. If he doesn’t, someone else will.

LIAR. I was never told and never did that. LIAR. I will tell the truth in court and also tell of the lies being told to the prosecutor.

 

[anonymous]

LIAR. I was never told and never did that. LIAR. I will tell the truth in court and also tell of the lies being told to the prosecutor.

You’re so full of shit it can’t be pumped out

 

[anonymous]

LIAR. Slander and lawsuits to follow.

 

[anonymous]

LIAR. I was never told and never did that. LIAR. I will tell the truth in court and also tell of the lies being told to the prosecutor.

Can’t lie about things I saw first hand in many places across this land.

Holy shit that rhymed!

Well anyway go f*ck yourself with your head buried in the sand

 

[anonymous]

Can’t lie about things I saw first hand in many places across this land.

Holy shit that rhymed!

Well anyway go f*ck yourself with your head buried in the sand

You must-have been hanging around the wrong crowd. Spent too much time in the bar. F*ckng around is your thing.

 

[anonymous]

You’re whitewashing it a bit.

1) RB from the very beginning was telling docs to tell patients to stay on Suboxone forever, saying it’s just like treating diabetes. You don’t need a medical degree to know taking any opiate (including Suboxone) for years is bad for your health. You just need common sense. Plenty of research that clearly illustrates the negative effects of long term Suboxone including low T and, ironically, increase risk of diabetes. From the very beginning there was never an exit strategy off Suboxone, and there still isn’t.

2) Suboxone didn’t get traction until the Purdue model was adopted: trade cash for drugs. This was done by recruiting docs to “build their practices” by getting X waivered so they could charge desperate patients cash to access Suboxone. And they did charge them cash, even if the patient had insurance. Then RB and docs promoted high doses (32mg / day was common) knowing full well patients were selling most of what was prescribed to 1) generate cash to pay the doctor for more Suboxone, and, 2) often buy heroin or other drugs. This model was identical to the Purdue pill mill model most everyone (RB, docs, patients) knew it.

Don’t worry, Sam Quinones is working on Dreamland, part 2, and he’ll lay out the role RB played in worsening the epidemic in easy to understand language. If he doesn’t, someone else will.

Never did or was told to do this. Was overloaded with rules and told NOT to do that. Fact.

 

[anonymous]

Another one bites the dust! Her team is ecstatic!

Quit before she was fired. Some people should not be managers.

 

[anonymous]

LIAR. I was never told and never did that. LIAR. I will tell the truth in court and also tell of the lies being told to the prosecutor.

Answer this question:

When a doc asks you: “I have a patient who has been on the same low dose of Suboxone for 3 years with no positive urines that is asking to be tapered off. What’s the best way to do that?”

What do you say in response ?

 

[anonymous]

Answer this question:

When a doc asks you: “I have a patient who has been on the same low dose of Suboxone for 3 years with no positive urines that is asking to be tapered off. What’s the best way to do that?”

What do you say in response ?

I can only speak about what is in the PI. Here is the MIU number.