• Mon news: Novartis in $745M radiopharma pact. Novo launches Wegovy in China. COVID-era telehealth prescribing extended. Hims & Hers GLP-1 tracker. Promising Gilead liver disease trial. See more on our front page

PSA - Medical Simulation (MedSim) On Last Legs

Quote
anonymous said:
That is not a funny joke!

Bob Vidal discriminated against, victimized and harassed me. MSC doesn’t have a HR department or a HR generalist to go to. She quit a long time ago and was never replaced. There is no HR training. MaryBeth is CEO and a close family friend of his. I couldn’t go to her and she bullies women in the office. The Board of Directors is at best absent.

I had nowhere to turn and feared for my job if I came forward. It is such a hostile workplace. Thank God a coworker told me about this website. I was unaware Bob harassed other women in the office. There appears to be a pattern after reading about his interactions with our sales and clinical reps. How many others are there? Did he do it when he was school superintendent?

Bob, MaryBeth and Board of Directors (Jim Tobin, John Gaither, John Hirschmann) should be held accountable for their failure to create a safe work environment.
Click to expand...


So so sorry for u. Get a lawyer. File federal complaint. Guess anthr “misunderstanding” w Bob. his buddy’s CEO so must think He has free rein.


anonymous said:
Fucking Christ. This thread is nothing but a one year diatribe of the same bullshit repeated again and again. You assholes should seriously be in counseling. This amount of obsessive hatred for two people and such a small company is illogical. There is so much more to life than this.
Click to expand...


Excuse me Mr. Swedish Meatball. Thread is crrnt & frmr MSC ppl sharing TRUTH. Bob and MB & BoD are LIARS. Same shit repeats cos they do it REPEATEDLY. Why you think MSCs a GHOST TOWN?

Thread is a testament to hate and disgust ppl feel for them. Current & ex employees contributed. Think on that Mr. logic. Ask yourself What did these 2 do to cause so much anger? You’re working a deal w them?

Info leaked here Bob & MB shows what bad job they’ve done..They isolated & control narrative w board. At this point Boards 100% gullible morons or complicit.

Walk mile in our shoes dude. YOU HAVE NO IDEA.
 




anonymous said:
Such a sad story. Too bad you didn’t have the balls to do or say anything about it and instead you just got walked all over. (I assume your sad little story ended with you quitting?) Good luck next time life shows you some adversity. Maybe next time consider putting up a little fight.
Click to expand...

Hey dickhead. Have some heart. She had strength to get word out. Ever heard of the statute of limitations? Theres time to act if it hasn’t lapsed.
 




anonymous said:
Such a sad story. Too bad you didn’t have the balls to do or say anything about it and instead you just got walked all over. (I assume your sad little story ended with you quitting?) Good luck next time life shows you some adversity. Maybe next time consider putting up a little fight.
Click to expand...

That's because this story is pure fiction. Lots of avenues available to these "victims", why choose anonymous postings. Really? you are trying too hard to discredit BV and MB. All you are doing is disrespecting the real victims of sexual harassment. So identify yourself and the others that where "harassed" if it really did happened, what do you have to loose? Oh wait that is why you write anonymous post. Some little guy must be making these posts.
 








anonymous said:
That is not a funny joke!

Bob Vidal discriminated against, victimized and harassed me. MSC doesn’t have a HR department or a HR generalist to go to. She quit a long time ago and was never replaced. There is no HR training. MaryBeth is CEO and a close family friend of his. I couldn’t go to her and she bullies women in the office. The Board of Directors is at best absent.

I had nowhere to turn and feared for my job if I came forward. It is such a hostile workplace. Thank God a coworker told me about this website. I was unaware Bob harassed other women in the office. There appears to be a pattern after reading about his interactions with our sales and clinical reps. How many others are there? Did he do it when he was school superintendent?

Bob, MaryBeth and Board of Directors (Jim Tobin, John Gaither, John Hirschmann) should be held accountable for their failure to create a safe work environment.
Click to expand...

This must be the same individual who posted that the victim has a substance abuse problem. You are right this is not a joke, specially for the real victims of sexual harassment.
 




anonymous said:
This must be the same individual who posted that the victim has a substance abuse problem. You are right this is not a joke, specially for the real victims of sexual harassment.
Click to expand...

Bob Vidal continues to lie and victimize women. I just looked up Rule 11. You lied to your lawyer and he submitted false evidence on record from MaryBeth and yourself. I hope the other women you’ve terrorized are willing to join me. Pig!
 












anonymous said:
I and a friend/former MSC coworker also popped in at the Arapahoe County Courthouse to watch the proceedings. We were not witnesses but wanted to show our support for the plaintiff. We arrived right before the judge walked in. The attorney for MSC was pacing back and forth. He had no paperwork or briefcase with him. BV and MB were not present. We had to sneak out before it ended but I will give highlights of what we did see. The judge started by questioning MSC as to why their confession of judgment contained the incorrect $ amount. The MSC attorney told the judge to ask the plaintiff and the judge shot back that it was MSC's responsibility to explain this not the plaintiff's. The whole proceeding had to be embarrassing for the MSC attorney. The judge made a point of calling out MSC for refusing to pay the plaintiff what they owed him for over two years and for forcing the plaintiff to spend a year in court only for MSC to now admit that owed the money. He was complementary to the plaintiff and acknowledged that MSC's counterclaim was a baseless effort to intimidate and damage the plaintiff's reputation. The attorney then stood up and said something about asserting Rule 11. The judge noted that and then ruled against all of the terms MSC asked for on the confession of judgment. He ruled for the plaintiff on the amount he requested including interest and additional costs. The last thing we heard before we had to step out was after MSC attorney admitted he did not bring a check for the judgment amount. The judge told the plaintiff that although he did not have the power to enforce judgments he encouraged the plaintiff to use all of the tools available to him through the courts to force MSC to pay. We looked up the meaning of Rule 11 and it indicates that the attorney was trying to protect himself from possible sanctions for signing his name to filings on behalf of his client that may contain false information.
Click to expand...

Since you count on “ readers” not to bother to look up the content and meaning of Rule 11, here it is:

Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions



(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery;

The factual contentions in this case, MSC claimed that it had evidentiary proof of improper conduct, showing that the Plaintiff had released company information to competitors and other outside parties, had omitted information in his unemployment fillings, and there is reason to believe that he had been working for his current employer while employed at MSC. These claims have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery;


If you were present at the hearing, you had to be Bill Younkes and Herb’s soon to be ex-wife, you would have witnesses MSC’s attorney assert the validity of the counter suit and that these claims are valid and substantiated.

One important point, the judge did not dismiss MSC’s claims, MSC released the plaintiff as part of a undeserved settlement.
 




anonymous said:
I and a friend/former MSC coworker also popped in at the Arapahoe County Courthouse to watch the proceedings. We were not witnesses but wanted to show our support for the plaintiff. We arrived right before the judge walked in. The attorney for MSC was pacing back and forth. He had no paperwork or briefcase with him. BV and MB were not present. We had to sneak out before it ended but I will give highlights of what we did see. The judge started by questioning MSC as to why their confession of judgment contained the incorrect $ amount. The MSC attorney told the judge to ask the plaintiff and the judge shot back that it was MSC's responsibility to explain this not the plaintiff's. The whole proceeding had to be embarrassing for the MSC attorney. The judge made a point of calling out MSC for refusing to pay the plaintiff what they owed him for over two years and for forcing the plaintiff to spend a year in court only for MSC to now admit that owed the money. He was complementary to the plaintiff and acknowledged that MSC's counterclaim was a baseless effort to intimidate and damage the plaintiff's reputation. The attorney then stood up and said something about asserting Rule 11. The judge noted that and then ruled against all of the terms MSC asked for on the confession of judgment. He ruled for the plaintiff on the amount he requested including interest and additional costs. The last thing we heard before we had to step out was after MSC attorney admitted he did not bring a check for the judgment amount. The judge told the plaintiff that although he did not have the power to enforce judgments he encouraged the plaintiff to use all of the tools available to him through the courts to force MSC to pay. We looked up the meaning of Rule 11 and it indicates that the attorney was trying to protect himself from possible sanctions for signing his name to filings on behalf of his client that may contain false information.
Click to expand...
 




anonymous said:
I and a friend/former MSC coworker also popped in at the Arapahoe County Courthouse to watch the proceedings. We were not witnesses but wanted to show our support for the plaintiff. We arrived right before the judge walked in. The attorney for MSC was pacing back and forth. He had no paperwork or briefcase with him. BV and MB were not present. We had to sneak out before it ended but I will give highlights of what we did see. The judge started by questioning MSC as to why their confession of judgment contained the incorrect $ amount. The MSC attorney told the judge to ask the plaintiff and the judge shot back that it was MSC's responsibility to explain this not the plaintiff's. The whole proceeding had to be embarrassing for the MSC attorney. The judge made a point of calling out MSC for refusing to pay the plaintiff what they owed him for over two years and for forcing the plaintiff to spend a year in court only for MSC to now admit that owed the money. He was complementary to the plaintiff and acknowledged that MSC's counterclaim was a baseless effort to intimidate and damage the plaintiff's reputation. The attorney then stood up and said something about asserting Rule 11. The judge noted that and then ruled against all of the terms MSC asked for on the confession of judgment. He ruled for the plaintiff on the amount he requested including interest and additional costs. The last thing we heard before we had to step out was after MSC attorney admitted he did not bring a check for the judgment amount. The judge told the plaintiff that although he did not have the power to enforce judgments he encouraged the plaintiff to use all of the tools available to him through the courts to force MSC to pay. We looked up the meaning of Rule 11 and it indicates that the attorney was trying to protect himself from possible sanctions for signing his name to filings on behalf of his client that may contain false information.
Click to expand...

Oh, here's what Rule 11 means:

Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery;

The factual contentions in this case, MSC claimed that it had evidentiary proof of improper conduct, showing that the Plaintiff had released company information to competitors and other outside parties, had omitted information in his unemployment fillings, and there is reason to believe that he had been working for his current employer while employed at MSC. These claims have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery;

If you were present at the hearing, you had to be Bill Younkes and Herb’s soon to be ex-wife, you would have witnesses MSC’s attorney assert the validity of the counter suit and that these claims are valid and substantiated.

One important point, the judge did not dismiss MSC’s claims, MSC released the plaintiff as part of a undeserved settlement.
 








If you were present at the hearing, you had to be Bill Younkes and Herb’s soon to be ex-wife, you would have witnesses MSC’s attorney assert the validity of the counter suit and that these claims are valid and substantiated.

One important point, the judge did not dismiss MSC’s claims, MSC released the plaintiff as part of a undeserved settlement. [/QUOTE]
 




If you were present at the hearing, you had to be Bill Younkes and Herb’s soon to be ex-wife, you would have witnesses MSC’s attorney assert the validity of the counter suit and that these claims are valid and substantiated.

  1. One important point, the judge did not dismiss MSC’s claims, MSC released the plaintiff as part of a undeserved settlement. [/QUOTE]
 




If you were present at the hearing, you had to be Bill Younkes and Herb’s soon to be ex-wife, you would have witnesses MSC’s attorney assert the validity of the counter suit and that these claims are valid and substantiated.

  1. One important point, the judge did not dismiss MSC’s claims, MSC released the plaintiff as part of a undeserved settlement. [/QUOTE]
 












anonymous said:
If you were present at the hearing, you had to be Bill Younkes and Herb’s soon to be ex-wife, you would have witnesses MSC’s attorney assert the validity of the counter suit and that these claims are valid and substantiated.

  1. One important point, the judge did not dismiss MSC’s claims, MSC released the plaintiff as part of a undeserved settlement.
​

You write like a cereal killer! what's the plan, Special K?
Click to expand...
 




chic-office-space-milton-natural-born-reviewers-office-space-1999-anibundel.png
 








Top Bottom
Back
Quote