Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
I also agree that the work environment at Dendreon is good. I am very happy to be working for the company.
Private actions have no harbor for completely ommitting risk factors that end up coming to fruition. The only real harbor is to buy an expensive primary residence. At least that pretty much assures there will always be a home if there is enough money to pay things like property taxes and electric bills.
Any one who says they like working here or the environment is good has not been here very long. During the NSM TR asked people who had been with dndn less than 1 yr to stand Roughly 70% of the commercial org stood. So keep watching newbies.
I understand why these people love working at Dendreon. The company is paying insane amounts of money to attrack people and Management is saying a lot of good stuff. The problem is nothing has really changed.
Example: during the NSM there was a lot of talk about a new sales process. It went something like this:
1) Develop clinical conviction
2) Remove barriers to access
3) mobilze e systematic patient id
Then there was a lot of chatter about "-- we must understand where the customer is in the sales process." This sounds good, right? Sure it does. Problems is this is not the reality. Many want to skip step 2 and go from step 1 to step 3. Hell, some would just rather you bring in the contract and forget steps 1 and 2. Whats more is as soon as we got back in the field we had another soft week and are being directed to go chase enrollments or else you suck as a rep.
I've not began to touch on the huge influx of people who are Amgen drones. Of course if you are from Amgen you probably don't see a problem here. But if you are not then you are beginning to feel like your career options might be very limited at DNDN because these folks are loyal to one another not because of performance but because of ego stroking and ball licking.
Did anyone read the email that "E" sent to TR right around Christmas? I'm sure he didnt mean to reply to all but he basically gave him a BJ over email for all to see.
You hit the nail on the head! Couldn't have said it better. Who the hell is EG anyway? Saw that email and almost puked. That's the "culture" here now.
I fully agree with post #86 and the NSM went fine and I am looking forward to 2013 with my personal expectations of nice growth in provenge revenues and continued declines in Zytiga sales - something that actually happened in Q4 2012 with Zytiga revenues down 16% in the U.S..
Okay poster 89. Time for a reality check. Zytiga sales ain't on the decline because of Provenge and 5% sequential growth is nothing to cheer over. It is hardly a breakout trend. 81M is well within the normal up and down trends we've seen over the last several quarters. That means Q1-13 results can be anybody's guess +\-.
The way I see it, JJ and the crew is playing a pipe to you ship full of rats and you like the song because you are paid well and had a nice meeting in a posh hotel.
Look at it this way, 5% sequential growth equates to 41 more patients in q4 than q3.
(3.9M /93k=41). 3.9m is diff btw q3 and q4 sales divided by price of treatment gives you number of patients represented by the growth --41
Is that anything to get excited about? That means of the 140 people in the field including those in the scg, less than 30 percent of you grew your business by 1 patient. I'd be very worried if q1 looks anything like Q4. This signals, IMHO, that DNDN could exist with 25 reps and an scg group.
That means Q1-13 results can be anybody's guess +\-.
It's TRULY anybody's guess. Investors are hesitant because no one knows how much has been accelerated into q4 2012 from q1 2013. Everyone learned from last year's pre-announcement that selective disclosure is a concept they don't understand. Laws? What laws?
Okay poster 89. Time for a reality check. Zytiga sales ain't on the decline because of Provenge and 5% sequential growth is nothing to cheer over. It is hardly a breakout trend. 81M is well within the normal up and down trends we've seen over the last several quarters. That means Q1-13 results can be anybody's guess +\-.
The way I see it, JJ and the crew is playing a pipe to you ship full of rats and you like the song because you are paid well and had a nice meeting in a posh hotel.
Look at it this way, 5% sequential growth equates to 41 more patients in q4 than q3.
(3.9M /93k=41). 3.9m is diff btw q3 and q4 sales divided by price of treatment gives you number of patients represented by the growth --41
Is that anything to get excited about? That means of the 140 people in the field including those in the scg, less than 30 percent of you grew your business by 1 patient. I'd be very worried if q1 looks anything like Q4. This signals, IMHO, that DNDN could exist with 25 reps and an scg group.