NCAA FOOTBALL WEEK 13 PICK EM! RIVALRY WEEK!!

Here are the rules.

SUMMARIZED RULES:


1) Pickers who elect to remain anonymous are welcome, but must adopt an unregistered sport's board name (ie. BroncoBoy) to get due recognition for your picks. Please identify yourself with each post.

2) During regular season play all picks will be based on the "odds" or the "point" system reported by USA Today (SportsDirect) prior to the week's games. The "points" recognized will be the "points" displayed on posted "Pick-Em" schedule that will available for viewing 3-4 days in advance of the week's games. Should the "point" spreads change after the "Pick-Em" schedule is posted - the revised "points" shall not apply.

3) YOU CANNOT EDIT YOUR PICKS & POSTS BEFORE GAME TIME!! You may pick a Thursday Night Game and make the rest of your picks before 11:00 AM SATURDAY EASTERN TIME!!

4) Not all NCAA Div. 1 games will make the weekly "Pick-Em" schedule. Only those major games of interest. We are going for quality here. Not quantity. Games with a 21 "point" spread or greater are highly discouraged. If a picker wants to add an unlisted game contact the interim coordinator BroncoBoy.

5) All pickers shall show respect and courtesy toward their fellow pickers (BRONCOBOY!). A competitive spirit is fine. But let's keep it clean and be friends. We don't want to evolve into vitriol and mean spiritness that got the poli board shut down. Be nice to one another.

6) In the event of a board dispute on operational matters - all disputes will be resolved by the majority. There are no kings or queens on this board who have the final say. We are a democracy - and the majority rules. If the majority is only 2 people - so be it.

7) If there is a tie or pushed Game everyone will receive the pick as a "win."

8) Post-season play (bowl games) shall be based on straight picks and NOT the "point" system used during regular season play.

9) PLEASE!! BOLD & UNDERLINE ALL OF YOUR PICKS!!

You are breaking #5 by cussing me. You broke #3. Show me where your made up rule is and I will shut up. If you get that pick then Pick em is a fraud.

You're 'fuckie' posting anonomously aren't you? You're just scared because I'm challenging you for the crown, so you want to change the standard and accepted rules that we've been playing by for weeks. Go back and review our discussions for the reason behind the rule. It was to prevent players LIKE YOU from editing their ORIGINAL PICK POST after the start of the games. But we said REPEATEDLY that it was okay to change INDIVIDUAL GAME PICKS as long as the changes were reflected in A SEPARATE PICK POST and the edit happened PRIOR TO THE START of the respective game pick that was edited. Pull your head from your f...ing ass and take a deep breath.
 






IMO the 2012 Ohio State team is not a great team. Certainly not in the same class as those Ohio State teams that I remember that played under the tutelage of The Great Woody Hayes. Now those were some great f...ing teams that kicked ass and took names. But the 2012 OSU team is certainly a good and a respectable team. I like them because....like I've previously pointed out....OSU always finds some way to win a ball game. Several of their wins have been by itty bitty margins. And there was certainly a nice dose of 'luck' thrown in on some of those victories. To be honest I can't really point to one GREAT NCAA football team in 2012. I guess if you looked at the stats the closest team to being a GREAT team would be the Oregon Ducks with an average point score of over 50 points per game. But none of the others really impress me. 2012 has been an awful season for college football IMO. The first 70% of the season was totally boring. We need more GOOD MATCHUPS at the start of the season instead of pitting powerhouses against cupcakes. That needs to stop. It is hurting the quality of college football. And at the end of the season there should be NO CUPCAKES WHATSOEVER on the schedule for any of the top 10 ranked teams!!!!
 






IMO the 2012 Ohio State team is not a great team. Certainly not in the same class as those Ohio State teams that I remember that played under the tutelage of The Great Woody Hayes. Now those were some great f...ing teams that kicked ass and took names. But the 2012 OSU team is certainly a good and a respectable team. I like them because....like I've previously pointed out....OSU always finds some way to win a ball game. Several of their wins have been by itty bitty margins. And there was certainly a nice dose of 'luck' thrown in on some of those victories. To be honest I can't really point to one GREAT NCAA football team in 2012. I guess if you looked at the stats the closest team to being a GREAT team would be the Oregon Ducks with an average point score of over 50 points per game. But none of the others really impress me. 2012 has been an awful season for college football IMO. The first 70% of the season was totally boring. We need more GOOD MATCHUPS at the start of the season instead of pitting powerhouses against cupcakes. That needs to stop. It is hurting the quality of college football. And at the end of the season there should be NO CUPCAKES WHATSOEVER on the schedule for any of the top 10 ranked teams!!!!

Yesterday's game reminded me of Bo and Woody's era. I kept looking for Cornelius Green and Archie Griffin to show up. If not them, Rex Kern, Jim Otis, or Jim Stillwagon. Are you impressed by my historical recollection Mr. Lane?
 






You're 'fuckie' posting anonomously aren't you? You're just scared because I'm challenging you for the crown, so you want to change the standard and accepted rules that we've been playing by for weeks. Go back and review our discussions for the reason behind the rule. It was to prevent players LIKE YOU from editing their ORIGINAL PICK POST after the start of the games. But we said REPEATEDLY that it was okay to change INDIVIDUAL GAME PICKS as long as the changes were reflected in A SEPARATE PICK POST and the edit happened PRIOR TO THE START of the respective game pick that was edited. Pull your head from your f...ing ass and take a deep breath.

Discussions are not rules. Pick em is a fraud if they allow you to break the rules. You can not make the rules as you go along like you think you can.
 






You're 'fuckie' posting anonomously aren't you? You're just scared because I'm challenging you for the crown, so you want to change the standard and accepted rules that we've been playing by for weeks. Go back and review our discussions for the reason behind the rule. It was to prevent players LIKE YOU from editing their ORIGINAL PICK POST after the start of the games. But we said REPEATEDLY that it was okay to change INDIVIDUAL GAME PICKS as long as the changes were reflected in A SEPARATE PICK POST and the edit happened PRIOR TO THE START of the respective game pick that was edited. Pull your head from your f...ing ass and take a deep breath.

Wrong, fucknut. I may be a woman, but I ain't no pussy. If I wanted to challenge you on this, I would. After all we have been through, why would I start anon posting against you now?

You probably won't believe me, like you didn't believe a word I said all season. I'm just answering your claim to let you know that I am a straight shooter - no anon posting (except on my company's board), no multiple registered accounts, nothing. I am offended by your accusation.

DID YOU NOT SEE ABOVE WHEN I POSTED LAST NIGHT THAT I AGREED WITH YOU? PLEASE SEE MY DRUNKEN POST ON PAGE 1 REGARDING YOU CHANGING YOUR PICK. I have to spoon feed you everything.

I think I may know who it is, but....nah, it can't be. He's at church.
 
Last edited:












Discussions are not rules. Pick em is a fraud if they allow you to break the rules. You can not make the rules as you go along like you think you can.

This has already been explained in it's totality. A player cannot possibly cheat if he or she changes his or her pick PRIOR to game time under a separate post. Besides, it doesn't really matter what you think or say anyway.

So do us a favor and go F yourself.
 






This has already been explained in it's totality. A player cannot possibly cheat if he or she changes his or her pick PRIOR to game time under a separate post. Besides, it doesn't really matter what you think or say anyway.

So do us a favor and go F yourself.

Show me in the rules where you can change your pick right before a game.
 






Show me in the rules where you can change your pick right before a game.

Show me a rule that says that players can't add their own games to the schedule that aren't included on the one posted by BamaBoy each week?

There's no rule that states we can't - but some things are just f...cking obvious that any dipshit can normally figure out on his own. :D
 






There's no rule that states we can't - but some things are just f...cking obvious that any dipshit can normally figure out on his own. :D

like this one?

3) YOU CANNOT EDIT YOUR PICKS & POSTS BEFORE GAME TIME!! You may pick a Thursday Night Game and make the rest of your picks before 11:00 AM SATURDAY EASTERN TIME!!


Quit cheating.
 






Tink, did you watch UCLA when they played USC??? You'd have to be blind not to see that the UCLA that played Stanford tonight was a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BALL TEAM!!! THEY SUCKED!!!

IMO UCLA did not want to face Oregon for the conference title. So they played a half-ass game tonight to make sure that they would play Stanford again next week in the conference championship game instead of Oregon. Now mark my words, Tink. UCLA will bring a COMPLETLELY DIFFERENT GAME next week compared to how they played tonight! Trust me on that!!!

Chip Kelly should file a protest with the PAC 12 and the NCAA! Oregon lost ONE STINKING GAME in OVERTIME by 3 f...ing points to the nation's #13 team and got blackballed from the NC game due to rigged football!!! It's bullshit!!!

I am not so sure that UCLA would have wanted to ruin their record by throwing a game. I saw them play a good game tonight, but I saw Stanford play an amazing game. We'll see next week what thye bring.

I think the Ducks got screwed this year-- I would have loved to see them play Bama!!!!!
 






That old saying "The luck of the Irish" sure rang true this year. Whoever plays ND in the NC game will kick their ass. And I am so f...ing tired of all these announcers making such a big deal out of that ND linebacker named "Teo" or whatever the F his name is. I think his girlfriend died or something so everybody felt sorry for him. It's one of those human interest stories that the media blew out of proportion to sell advertisements. Now they want to make him the Heisman trophy winner. heh. Shit, there are at least a dozen linebackers that I can name who played NCAA ball this year who are much better and deserving than he is. I watched "Teo" get burned by the USC offense at least 8 f..ing times tonight. F the Irish. I can't wait to watch them get their asses blasted off the field in the NC game.

I see ND losing the NC game. What is it with media and their bleeding heart sob stories??? I am sure every player out there has some kind of heartbreak story somewhere, I hate it when they dramatize everything, and yes I agree Teo did not play all that yesterday.
 






Not much going on today - from my doing the scores I have the following:

Fucktard 11-7
Tink 10-8
Bama 12-6 way to go
Bronco 11-7
Pho 10-7 he didn't make a pick for one game
White Trash 7-11

Don't take these as final - I could be wrong.
 






I am not so sure that UCLA would have wanted to ruin their record by throwing a game. I saw them play a good game tonight, but I saw Stanford play an amazing game. We'll see next week what thye bring.

I think the Ducks got screwed this year-- I would have loved to see them play Bama!!!!!

Tink, we must have watched 2 different games last night.

UCLA averaged 475 total yards a game for 2012. Last night they were good for 334 with 12 penalties for 135 yards. UCLA possessed the ball for 25 minutes compared to 34 minutes for Stanford. Against USC UCLA had 406 total yards and possessed the ball for 34 minutes.

UCLA played a half-assed game to avoid playing Oregon in the conference championship. UCLA would rather take a loss - which would not really hurt them at all as long as they win the PAC 12 championship and go to the Rose Bowl. UCLA had no chance of going to a BCS game anyway. None. So they lost NOTHING by losing to Stanford yesterday. But they gained an easier opponent in the conference championship.

Think about it.
 






Tink, we must have watched 2 different games last night.

UCLA averaged 475 total yards a game for 2012. Last night they were good for 334 with 12 penalties for 135 yards. UCLA possessed the ball for 25 minutes compared to 34 minutes for Stanford. Against USC UCLA had 406 total yards and possessed the ball for 34 minutes.

UCLA played a half-assed game to avoid playing Oregon in the conference championship. UCLA would rather take a loss - which would not really hurt them at all as long as they win the PAC 12 championship and go to the Rose Bowl. UCLA had no chance of going to a BCS game anyway. None. So they lost NOTHING by losing to Stanford yesterday. But they gained an easier opponent in the conference championship.

Think about it.

U R on dope
 






I see ND losing the NC game. What is it with media and their bleeding heart sob stories??? I am sure every player out there has some kind of heartbreak story somewhere, I hate it when they dramatize everything, and yes I agree Teo did not play all that yesterday.

That's exactly what it is, Tink. A f...ing sob story. Like a football soap opera. Teo had a couple problems in his personal life (girlfriend's death and something else I can't recall) and the media is turning him into a football superstar when he's really not that good if you compare him to other defensive players in the league. When is the last time a defensive player was considered for the Heisman? Seriously? But that's the story of our entire nation today. The media takes a story and turns it into what it wants it to be through public manipulation. Human beings are lemmings. If you tell them something over and over and over again - even if it's a lie - they'll start to believe it. Poor, poor Teo. He's had a couple problems in his life so let's award him the Heisman!!! heh. What a load of bullshit!
 






Mark my words, folks.

UCLA will bring a totally different game next week against Stanford. You won't recognize UCLA compared to how they played yesterday.

That will be the final evidence that substantiates my opinion. Watch closely. After you finish watching the UCLA/Stanford game next week you will sit back, scratch your head and say "By God, BroncoBoy was right. Those bastards let Stanford beat them in the first game to avoid playing Oregon for the PAC 12 conference title."

If you bet against UCLA next week you are a fool. Just like I told you this week: Had I been in Vegas over the weekend I would have thrown down a shitload on Stanford and won big!

The system is rigged. It's fixed.
 






Mark my words, folks.

UCLA will bring a totally different game next week against Stanford. You won't recognize UCLA compared to how they played yesterday.

That will be the final evidence that substantiates my opinion. Watch closely. After you finish watching the UCLA/Stanford game next week you will sit back, scratch your head and say "By God, BroncoBoy was right. Those bastards let Stanford beat them in the first game to avoid playing Oregon for the PAC 12 conference title."

If you bet against UCLA next week you are a fool. Just like I told you this week: Had I been in Vegas over the weekend I would have thrown down a shitload on Stanford and won big!

The system is rigged. It's fixed.

U R on dope
 






NCAA FOOTBALL WEEK 13 PICK EM FINAL

1. BAMABOY!!!! (12-6) (I can't believe I finally won one this season!! ROLL TIDE!! The SEC came through for me!)

2. FUCKTARD (11-7) BRONCOBOY (11-7) Fucktard- The Gators looked great yesterday!! If the Florida QB (Driskel) would not have been injured this season Florida could have definitely beaten Georgia to play in the SEC Championship. I would rather BAMA play Notre Dame than Florida if we get into the NC.)

BRONCOBOY- I cannot believe you picked the ACC (GA TECH, FSU & CLEMSON??) You might think the SEC is having a down year but the SEC is way better than the ACC. I thought you would have at least picked GEORGIA over GEORGIA TECH! You got that Washington State and Virginia picks right though! You were right about the Stanford Vs. UCLA game. Oregon took out their aggression on Oregon State...)

3. TINKRBELLE (10-8) (Thanks to Arizona State for covering the spread! I cannot believe you did not pick BAMA though? Auburn is a horrible team and the Head Coach-Gene Chizik was fired today.)

4. PALE HORSE (10-7) (You did not make a choice in the LSU Vs. Arkansas game and that is why you are 10-7. Man you picked Auburn, Clemson and FSU? ACC Vs. SEC is no contest! Thanks for playing this week and look forward to Championship Saturday!)

5. WHITE TRASH (7-11) (Man you were killing it there for awhile with your picks! You also had very little faith in the SEC Vs. ACC. People here have go to understand that ACC= ALMOST CUPCAKE CONFERENCE! I look forward to your Championship Picks next week!)
 
Last edited:






Not much going on today - from my doing the scores I have the following:

Fucktard 11-7
Tink 10-8
Bama 12-6 way to go
Bronco 11-7
Pho 10-7 he didn't make a pick for one game
White Trash 7-11

Don't take these as final - I could be wrong.

Thanks Fuckie! I double checked my scores against yours and they are accurate!