We don't need another CIA dumb-fuck because your sorry ass pushes the envelope. BI doesn't run with short, simple messaging. Instead they want to get reps to go get in the weeds, nitty-gritty type messaging that confuses practitioners.
Ex.,
[BI]P has superior efficacy (but only looks good if you look at relative not actual rates) but more GI bleeds so expect more GI bleeds than warf. Also we can now reverse out all those GI bleeds I've talked to you to death about.
[JnJ.] we are a once a day P with no lawsuits. or thier latest: X does better on diabetes patients. You don't need a reversal agent.
[Pf.] we have less bleed and less death, why would you need a reversal.
Which of these messages works?
Ex.,
[BI] Jar, do you have a negotiating patient who...blah..blah...blah.
[JnJ] Invo pushes out 1 pt A1c drops.
[AZ.] we have a card for F or whatever BS they spout.
Again, what message works?
Shall I give more?
Even go back to Mica, Mira, and even Spva. All we do is show up with: words, words, and more words while the competitors drive home a simple, easy, digestible message. Marketing dept doesn't need to break a CIA to actually craft a message that's short and to the point but BI rarely can get this done.
One last note, I don't know about you but BI has the WORST formulary coverage for its products than any other Pharma I've worked for. It's terrible. Why else is ano growing even though its an ass of a product (yes, pun intended here)? Look up the word "bundling" as it pertains to Pharma.