Michelle Breitenbach Pleaded Guilty Today

Quote
anonymous said:
You are actually #9- a middle aged corrupt TROLL with an enlarged prostate with no life and a wife who could be a spokesmodel for Dairy Queen.
Click to expand...

Oh this is fun.
I will play.
You didn't do too well.
I am a troll. I am not corrupt, but especially in the context of this room as I have no role in this crisis. I am not a doctor, user, seller, or employee.
I have life. It's above average by most standards.
My wife has always focused her career on more cerebral endeavors, so she is not a spokesmodel.
If this was a poorly executed sophomoric attempt at calling her fat, she is fit and prefers higher quality ice cream.

Let's turn to you.
You responded, so I must have been right.
Your anger is far more masculine, so I am guessing an ex-boyfriend was accurate.

Unfortunately, for this game, I am not familiar with Ms Breitenbach's personal situation so I am can't get you by name but if anyone on this board is more familiar, feel free to out his anonymity because he seems a bit unhinged.

Here is what I am thinking to help out this group:

Money: Based on previous posts you likely made, you were emasculated by the money she was making. So it would have to be someone who with with her when she was making money. Which was a short period as this was her first pharma job.

Sexuality: You are also very angry about her sexuality which suggests you feel she took something from you with it. This is tough. If she was your sugar mom, what could she have taken? Or maybe she traded up and you missed the sex. Or maybe you had others because YOU have a sex problem and you are projecting.

Connection: You can't let go. Which suggests something is tying you to her. House? Dog? Cat? Baby? Or you are just a little demented and can't let go of any girls you have ever had.

The Breakup: According to some previous posts she was on maternity leave in 2016. Assuming that is right, you are one of 3 people in her life.

1. You're the dad.
2. You are the guy she left to be with the dad.
3. She had lots of guys during this time and you didn't know.

#3 seems unlikely as no one would be this hung up after years unless they have attachment issues.
#1 seems unlikely as only a sick person would publicly say these things or be happy about this for their baby's mom.
#2 Seems most likely but I don't know the situation.

I hope it's #2 because, otherwise, you are likely a very sad, disturbed person who is likely capable of worse things than bad posts and grammar.
 






anonymous said:
You're ALL guilty. The big pharma corporations, the sales reps, the doctors and the political affiliates. Everyone is guilty for certain injustices, none greater or lesser than the rest. The big pharma's care nothing except for prescription metrics and revenue. The sales reps and their managers just cared about rewards in the form of compensation, presidents clubs, etc. The doctors are offsetting the screw jobs they've been getting from insurance companies for years and prescribe whatever suits their current finacial needs based on bribes. Political affiliates look for "kudos" from the public and press for "combating the opioid crisis" by taking down whoever is associated with the industry no matter how great or small. No one is without sin here and everyone has a level of guilt that they need to accept blame for.

None of you walk on water and everyone has a role to play in this horrible epidemic, including those who can't shake the addiction. No one, including those above forces anyone to become an addict. The only innocent party is the children as they are the only innocents here. The newborns referenced earlier. They didn't ask for this life. They had nothing to gain. They are the only ones that deserve any semblance of remorse.

The rest of you are all victims and criminals in you your own right. Accept it, move on and try to do better next time around. This back and forth is pointless. Justice may or may not be served, but the shaking infants only benefit by prevention, not mindless chatter bantering back and forth.

Everyone is guilty here despite the deflection that tries to prove otherwise.
Click to expand...

It appears that YOU are somehow uniquely qualified to be the judge and jury in this matter. How , or why, you believe your rather sweeping judgements, inviolate, is not at all clear. So while I disagree with pretty much your entire post, I will point out that ignorance (sales reps?) greed (corporate and individual MD's) and playing to the home crowd (politicians) is indeed reprehensible, Addiction, to opiates, gambling, alcohol or anything else is a chronic, difficult to treat, disease. Not a bad choice, not something to "accept and move on". Shaming victims and their families is why so many are afraid to admit their illness and seek the medical help they so desperately need.

Hang up your robe and gavel. Thank God it's not you, or someone you love, who suffers from addiction, and consider offering a hand to those less fortunate.
 






anonymous said:
not a fan of mb, but this thread makes me sick. mb should not have plead guilty, she was a victim herself. bullied by the government like so many others. probably threatened to lose her daughter, etc. anyone with NO prior pharma experience is NOT guilty!! they were hired and brainwashed into thinking this was normal in the industry. FU AG. you may have bullied her into a plea deal but the superior court is looking into your unscrupulous abuse of power and unethical practices!
Click to expand...

Anyone know how many people died due to shady Insys reps and their off label promotion?
 






anonymous said:
Oh this is fun.
I will play.
You didn't do too well.
I am a troll. I am not corrupt, but especially in the context of this room as I have no role in this crisis. I am not a doctor, user, seller, or employee.
I have life. It's above average by most standards.
My wife has always focused her career on more cerebral endeavors, so she is not a spokesmodel.
If this was a poorly executed sophomoric attempt at calling her fat, she is fit and prefers higher quality ice cream.

Let's turn to you.
You responded, so I must have been right.
Your anger is far more masculine, so I am guessing an ex-boyfriend was accurate.

Unfortunately, for this game, I am not familiar with Ms Breitenbach's personal situation so I am can't get you by name but if anyone on this board is more familiar, feel free to out his anonymity because he seems a bit unhinged.

Here is what I am thinking to help out this group:

Money: Based on previous posts you likely made, you were emasculated by the money she was making. So it would have to be someone who with with her when she was making money. Which was a short period as this was her first pharma job.

Sexuality: You are also very angry about her sexuality which suggests you feel she took something from you with it. This is tough. If she was your sugar mom, what could she have taken? Or maybe she traded up and you missed the sex. Or maybe you had others because YOU have a sex problem and you are projecting.

Connection: You can't let go. Which suggests something is tying you to her. House? Dog? Cat? Baby? Or you are just a little demented and can't let go of any girls you have ever had.

The Breakup: According to some previous posts she was on maternity leave in 2016. Assuming that is right, you are one of 3 people in her life.

1. You're the dad.
2. You are the guy she left to be with the dad.
3. She had lots of guys during this time and you didn't know.

#3 seems unlikely as no one would be this hung up after years unless they have attachment issues.
#1 seems unlikely as only a sick person would publicly say these things or be happy about this for their baby's mom.
#2 Seems most likely but I don't know the situation.

I hope it's #2 because, otherwise, you are likely a very sad, disturbed person who is likely capable of worse things than bad posts and grammar.
Click to expand...


Dean... brought his own sheets on President club trip he went with Breitenbach
 






The whole concept of a message board that allows users posts as "Anonymous" is flawed onto itself. These posts could be from countless users or only a few. The only logical criteria and rules that follow is that a poster would not quote or critique their own post...or would they? Trying to identify which "Anonymous" user is responding to what, seems like a futile attempt to make sense of an illogical and inherently flawed ruleset. In theory it could be one giant conversation someone is having with themselves through a multiple personality disorder syndrome. Or two parties engaged in a constant back and forth, wearing different masks portraying different viewpoints. Or 52 parties each only posting once.

While irrelevant to this particular subject matter, it is ultimately applicable to every message board that doesn't mandate user names and some sort of identity validation.

Food for thought.
 






anonymous said:
The whole concept of a message board that allows users posts as "Anonymous" is flawed onto itself. These posts could be from countless users or only a few. The only logical criteria and rules that follow is that a poster would not quote or critique their own post...or would they? Trying to identify which "Anonymous" user is responding to what, seems like a futile attempt to make sense of an illogical and inherently flawed ruleset. In theory it could be one giant conversation someone is having with themselves through a multiple personality disorder syndrome. Or two parties engaged in a constant back and forth, wearing different masks portraying different viewpoints. Or 52 parties each only posting once.

While irrelevant to this particular subject matter, it is ultimately applicable to every message board that doesn't mandate user names and some sort of identity validation.

Food for thought.
Click to expand...


It’s possible.
But this response is too long for someone who would want to provide “food for thought”. It serves no purpose here for a random person to post this.

Though it’s more likely this is the post of someone who wanted to remain anonymous and realized they outed themselves and now they are trying desperately to cover it up.
 






anonymous said:
It’s possible.
But this response is too long for someone who would want to provide “food for thought”. It serves no purpose here for a random person to post this.

Though it’s more likely this is the post of someone who wanted to remain anonymous and realized they outed themselves and now they are trying desperately to cover it up.
Click to expand...

The rabbit hole has no end in sight...Everyone knows the usual players on this board: MB herself, Alec, Rich Simon, the bitter ex-doctors that were on their payroll, fellow employees both past and present, etc. Everyone also knows certain folks (the Joe Rowan's of the world) that would never lower themselves to using this nonsense as a means of entertainment or anonymous venting or finger pointing. But now you have new players on the board, the people who saw one of the 8+ the articles on the Google newsfeed all about this guilty plea, and then followed the Cafepharma link in the search results and are now part of the merry band of idiots engaging in this back and forth.

And there's nothing that can be done about that no matter how much deflection and sad attempts at PR support is being attempted on here. Troll away folks, Troll away....
 






anonymous said:
I really do love these boards. There are so many people but they all fall into a few categories. Sometimes it is fun to guess.

1. (and the most popular on this board): Former employees who come on just for the pure schadenfreude.
2. Current employees who can't leave because they are toxic in the pharma world.
3. People or family members who were adversely affected by "the opioid crisis" looking for others to blame.
4. Doctors who are looking if anyone is ratting on them
5. Government officials looking for who to talk to next (yes, your tax dollars at work)
6. People who are long or short the stock trying to figure when to sell or cover.
7. Ex-boyfriends.
8. Girls who have had their guy stolen and so they are trying to spread rumors.

I am #6.

And you are likely #7. She must have really done a number on you for you to waste all your time on here.
If you're #8, get over it. He was going to leave you anyway.
Click to expand...

Very accurate post on who is on these boards
 












anonymous said:
The rabbit hole has no end in sight...Everyone knows the usual players on this board: MB herself, Alec, Rich Simon, the bitter ex-doctors that were on their payroll, fellow employees both past and present, etc. Everyone also knows certain folks (the Joe Rowan's of the world) that would never lower themselves to using this nonsense as a means of entertainment or anonymous venting or finger pointing. But now you have new players on the board, the people who saw one of the 8+ the articles on the Google newsfeed all about this guilty plea, and then followed the Cafepharma link in the search results and are now part of the merry band of idiots engaging in this back and forth.

And there's nothing that can be done about that no matter how much deflection and sad attempts at PR support is being attempted on here. Troll away folks, Troll away....
Click to expand...

No one who plead guilty or is cooperating with officials is on this board. The government reviews all devices and communications.

Food for thought
 






anonymous said:
No one who plead guilty or is cooperating with officials is on this board. The government reviews all devices and communications.

Food for thought
Click to expand...

Excellent attempt at deflection. Even if your statement above government review of devices and communications has merit, then what stops a friend or relative from posting on that person's behalf or that person from using someone else's device to post. The answer: NOTHING.
 






anonymous said:
Excellent attempt at deflection. Even if your statement above government review of devices and communications has merit, then what stops a friend or relative from posting on that person's behalf or that person from using someone else's device to post. The answer: NOTHING.
Click to expand...

if you are #7 then #5 knows who are #5 they will take your devices so we Don’t have to read your posts about an ex you can’t let go
 












  • That's too funny! Hi Joe!!!!!! , how have you been? Still living the dream? LMAO




  • anonymous said:
    The rabbit hole has no end in sight...Everyone knows the usual players on this board: MB herself, Alec, Rich Simon, the bitter ex-doctors that were on their payroll, fellow employees both past and present, etc. Everyone also knows certain folks (the Joe Rowan's of the world) that would never lower themselves to using this nonsense as a means of entertainment or anonymous venting or finger pointing. But now you have new players on the board, the people who saw one of the 8+ the articles on the Google newsfeed all about this guilty plea, and then followed the Cafepharma link in the search results and are now part of the merry band of idiots engaging in this back and forth.
    Click to expand...
anonymous said:
And there's nothing that can be done about that no matter how much deflection and sad attempts at PR support is being attempted on here. Troll away folks, Troll away....
Click to expand...
 












anonymous said:
not a fan of mb, but this thread makes me sick. mb should not have plead guilty, she was a victim herself. bullied by the government like so many others. probably threatened to lose her daughter, etc. anyone with NO prior pharma experience is NOT guilty!! they were hired and brainwashed into thinking this was normal in the industry. FU AG. you may have bullied her into a plea deal but the superior court is looking into your unscrupulous abuse of power and unethical practices!
Click to expand...

There's no excuse for not knowing right from wrong. Or, simply ignoring it.
 






MB will get what she deserves - prison! She earned it! (better give yourself an overload of botox to "try" to maintain that effed up face of yours - cuz u wont have access to it for a long time...hahaha)
 






anonymous said:
MB will get what she deserves - prison! She earned it! (better give yourself an overload of botox to "try" to maintain that effed up face of yours - cuz u wont have access to it for a long time...hahaha)
Click to expand...


Hi, angry, younger ex boyfriend! This was a bit of a non sequitur. So it must be a bad day for you and you are venting.

What has you so upset? Did she leave you? Did she shine the light on your cold, evil, psychopathic black soul? What’s wrong? Tell us!

Can someone please remove his anonymity. Clearly it’s an ex boyfriend, who was dating her while at Insys, and likely younger than she. There is likely some continued attachment, like a pet, child, or employment.

Judging by your anger and failure to let anything go, should only be concerned about your pending legal issues.
My guess is you wind up with more jail time than MB.
 












anonymous said:
I really do love these boards. There are so many people but they all fall into a few categories. Sometimes it is fun to guess.

1. (and the most popular on this board): Former employees who come on just for the pure schadenfreude.
2. Current employees who can't leave because they are toxic in the pharma world.
3. People or family members who were adversely affected by "the opioid crisis" looking for others to blame.
4. Doctors who are looking if anyone is ratting on them
5. Government officials looking for who to talk to next (yes, your tax dollars at work)
6. People who are long or short the stock trying to figure when to sell or cover.
7. Ex-boyfriends.
8. Girls who have had their guy stolen and so they are trying to spread rumors.

I am #6.

And you are likely #7. She must have really done a number on you for you to waste all your time on here.
If you're #8, get over it. He was going to leave you anyway.
Click to expand...

Hey #6!!!!

Anyone who tries to long or short this stock needs to get their head examined. You are a nut case.

And I am #12. Google it troll.
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote