Medicare Fraud

Jeez. If anybody is doing "loaner units" they are a fool. Please report to hotline. Where do they get the units to loan? From previous patients? Why???


What happens if the bone shows healing in the meantime?
 






Jeez. If anybody is doing "loaner units" they are a fool. Please report to hotline. Where do they get the units to loan? From previous patients? Why???


What happens if the bone shows healing in the meantime?

If the bone shows some healing, these reps grab a letter head, type out a note that says " non- union" and has Who knows who, sign. ( if it's private insurance; they have MA stamp signature, if Federal; Who knows?). Sometimes fake co morbidities are documented.

We just had coach us while most of us had our mouths wide open in disgust.

Very convoluted.
 










































Bioventus continues to only hire and promote the best of the best-
dishonest is dishonest.

Law360, New York (November 25, 2013, 2:10 PM ET) -- Medical device company Scion BioMedical Inc. launched a lawsuit Thursday in Florida federal court, accusing one of its board members of misusing confidential information from a new product Scion was developing, to file a patent for her own company.
The suit alleges that Allison London Brown, who was recruited to work as Scion’s chief strategy and operating officer, misappropriated trade secrets related to the company's development of the “Clo-SurPlus P.A.D.,” a device manufactured from a unique chitosan, or fat-binding fiber, used for managing bleeding wounds such as vascular-access sites.

The complaint, filed against Brown and her company Aegis Women’s Health Technologies, Inc., claims breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with advantageous business relationship and fraud in the inducement.

“Brown abused her position and breached her fiduciary duty by, among other things, deliberately, without justification and dishonestly, usurping for Aegis a Scion business relationship, potentially misappropriating confidential information belonging to Scion, and upon information and belief, filing a patent application on behalf of her own company Aegis that may include chitosan-based technology,” the complaint alleges.

The complaint says that after Brown was recruited to serve on Scion’s board of directors in January 2012, she and the company discussed ways they could collaborate to develop new products for Scion. Early the following year, Brown informed Scion that she had started Aegis Women’s Health Technologies Inc., a medical device company that focuses on solving the problem of recurring urinary tract infections, according to the suit.

Brown told Scion that her company’s technology was “vastly different” from Scion’s and that she would keep the business of the two companies separate, the complaint says. Scion and Brown then talked about having Brown work full time for the company as a chief strategy and operating officer, which would occur after Brown spent spent six months as a consultant and contractor for the company performing various duties, according to the complaint.

According to the suit, Scion sent Brown a sample of chitosan, valued at about $15,000, in March 2013 after Brown requested it to conduct research and develop a chitosan-based gel. Scion expected Brown to share her research and development with it, the company said.

But Scion said Brown potentially misappropriated the company’s trade secrets and used its confidential information to develop her own chitosan-based gel in her patent application filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. According to the complaint, Scion is the only company in the United States and one of only a few in the world that is able to manufacture biomedical-grade chitosan. Scion’s methods of creating its chitosan, which it has been using to develop new products, are proprietary trade secrets, the company said.

Representatives for the parties did not immediately respond Monday to a request for comment.

Scion BioMedical Inc. is represented by William R. Trueba and Francesca Russo of Espinosa Trueba PL.

Counsel information for defendants was not immediately available.

The case is Scion BioMedical Inc. v. Allison London Brown, case number not immediately available, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

--Editing by Richard McVay.
 






Bioventus continues to only hire and promote the best of the best-
dishonest is dishonest.

Law360, New York (November 25, 2013, 2:10 PM ET) -- Medical device company Scion BioMedical Inc. launched a lawsuit Thursday in Florida federal court, accusing one of its board members of misusing confidential information from a new product Scion was developing, to file a patent for her own company.
The suit alleges that Allison London Brown, who was recruited to work as Scion’s chief strategy and operating officer, misappropriated trade secrets related to the company's development of the “Clo-SurPlus P.A.D.,” a device manufactured from a unique chitosan, or fat-binding fiber, used for managing bleeding wounds such as vascular-access sites.

The complaint, filed against Brown and her company Aegis Women’s Health Technologies, Inc., claims breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with advantageous business relationship and fraud in the inducement.

“Brown abused her position and breached her fiduciary duty by, among other things, deliberately, without justification and dishonestly, usurping for Aegis a Scion business relationship, potentially misappropriating confidential information belonging to Scion, and upon information and belief, filing a patent application on behalf of her own company Aegis that may include chitosan-based technology,” the complaint alleges.

The complaint says that after Brown was recruited to serve on Scion’s board of directors in January 2012, she and the company discussed ways they could collaborate to develop new products for Scion. Early the following year, Brown informed Scion that she had started Aegis Women’s Health Technologies Inc., a medical device company that focuses on solving the problem of recurring urinary tract infections, according to the suit.

Brown told Scion that her company’s technology was “vastly different” from Scion’s and that she would keep the business of the two companies separate, the complaint says. Scion and Brown then talked about having Brown work full time for the company as a chief strategy and operating officer, which would occur after Brown spent spent six months as a consultant and contractor for the company performing various duties, according to the complaint.

According to the suit, Scion sent Brown a sample of chitosan, valued at about $15,000, in March 2013 after Brown requested it to conduct research and develop a chitosan-based gel. Scion expected Brown to share her research and development with it, the company said.

But Scion said Brown potentially misappropriated the company’s trade secrets and used its confidential information to develop her own chitosan-based gel in her patent application filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. According to the complaint, Scion is the only company in the United States and one of only a few in the world that is able to manufacture biomedical-grade chitosan. Scion’s methods of creating its chitosan, which it has been using to develop new products, are proprietary trade secrets, the company said.

Representatives for the parties did not immediately respond Monday to a request for comment.

Scion BioMedical Inc. is represented by William R. Trueba and Francesca Russo of Espinosa Trueba PL.

Counsel information for defendants was not immediately available.

The case is Scion BioMedical Inc. v. Allison London Brown, case number not immediately available, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

--Editing by Richard McVay.
 


















Bioventus continues to only hire and promote the best of the best-
dishonest is dishonest.

Law360, New York (November 25, 2013, 2:10 PM ET) -- Medical device company Scion BioMedical Inc. launched a lawsuit Thursday in Florida federal court, accusing one of its board members of misusing confidential information from a new product Scion was developing, to file a patent for her own company.
The suit alleges that Allison London Brown, who was recruited to work as Scion’s chief strategy and operating officer, misappropriated trade secrets related to the company's development of the “Clo-SurPlus P.A.D.,” a device manufactured from a unique chitosan, or fat-binding fiber, used for managing bleeding wounds such as vascular-access sites.

The complaint, filed against Brown and her company Aegis Women’s Health Technologies, Inc., claims breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with advantageous business relationship and fraud in the inducement.

“Brown abused her position and breached her fiduciary duty by, among other things, deliberately, without justification and dishonestly, usurping for Aegis a Scion business relationship, potentially misappropriating confidential information belonging to Scion, and upon information and belief, filing a patent application on behalf of her own company Aegis that may include chitosan-based technology,” the complaint alleges.

The complaint says that after Brown was recruited to serve on Scion’s board of directors in January 2012, she and the company discussed ways they could collaborate to develop new products for Scion. Early the following year, Brown informed Scion that she had started Aegis Women’s Health Technologies Inc., a medical device company that focuses on solving the problem of recurring urinary tract infections, according to the suit.

Brown told Scion that her company’s technology was “vastly different” from Scion’s and that she would keep the business of the two companies separate, the complaint says. Scion and Brown then talked about having Brown work full time for the company as a chief strategy and operating officer, which would occur after Brown spent spent six months as a consultant and contractor for the company performing various duties, according to the complaint.

According to the suit, Scion sent Brown a sample of chitosan, valued at about $15,000, in March 2013 after Brown requested it to conduct research and develop a chitosan-based gel. Scion expected Brown to share her research and development with it, the company said.

But Scion said Brown potentially misappropriated the company’s trade secrets and used its confidential information to develop her own chitosan-based gel in her patent application filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. According to the complaint, Scion is the only company in the United States and one of only a few in the world that is able to manufacture biomedical-grade chitosan. Scion’s methods of creating its chitosan, which it has been using to develop new products, are proprietary trade secrets, the company said.

Representatives for the parties did not immediately respond Monday to a request for comment.

Scion BioMedical Inc. is represented by William R. Trueba and Francesca Russo of Espinosa Trueba PL.

Counsel information for defendants was not immediately available.

The case is Scion BioMedical Inc. v. Allison London Brown, case number not immediately available, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

--Editing by Richard McVay.

Ok. I get it. Kind of like when we had a Reg. VP get caught for blatant Age Discrimination many years ago. He was then promoted to headquarters.
And kind of like those who they promote to lead other reps- the DOSs who coach reps into yhe same shenanigans they used.
 












This is who the masterminds hired as the new Director of Marketing. Allison London Brown-google her. Point being dishonest people are who are leading our company, they continue to promote and hire dishonest undeserving, shady people. I have loved this job and most aspects-but the writing is on the wall.
 






This is who the masterminds hired as the new Director of Marketing. Allison London Brown-google her. Point being dishonest people are who are leading our company, they continue to promote and hire dishonest undeserving, shady people. I have loved this job and most aspects-but the writing is on the wall.

On the wall, but more importantly on our commission statements. Oh wait, we never got a P1 commission statement. They just saw they f'd up and were going to overpay many so they changed it. No credibility in any leadership at this company.
 






On the wall, but more importantly on our commission statements. Oh wait, we never got a P1 commission statement. They just saw they f'd up and were going to overpay many so they changed it. No credibility in any leadership at this company.

Who knows what the real story is.

What a mess, everybody is burned out and looking for other jobs and the straw that broke the camel's back was the audacity of them telling us we may owe commission dollars back for January.
 






The Orthofix fraud that was being perpetrated involved their reps creating, changing and forging notes. Apparently the doctor in Virginia was helping them do this. I think this is worlds apart from what you are talking about here, and honestly I find it strange that you would link the two together.
That being said, we will all agree with you that it's either conservative + stim _or_ ORIF. The Orthofix reps in my area treat fresh fractures but they seem to bill the hospitals for all of these. Or do I thought - maybe they are changing notes like they do in the South!

Many reps here write notes on clinic letterhead. It is a filthy practice that began several years ago and gas been passed down by the direction of others. If a rep writes out a note under the pretense of an MD: that's a Problem. A big Problem.
 






But that is a fault of the system. If the patient is a smoker, diabetic, or the fracture is hanging around for months ORIF will probably fail. Surgery or revision surgery in a lot of cases is a shitty answer. If the patient heals one month faster the system wins. And why the hell should a patient endure surgery if they can be healed non-invasively. It's just dumb and the taxpayers are not being 'saved'. not by a long shot.

Sell it to the Dr and have NAMS sell it to Medicare just like the Brits sold it to National Healthcare.
 






What is interesting is I know some people that did go to compliance to blow the whistle on some in leadership concerning writing and faking notes. They had emails to prove it-and absolutely nothing was done. All of those involved are still employed! It just proves the lack of professionalism and carelessness in the company. I am shocked that there hasn't been a major whistleblower suit-there is certainly plenty of shadiness to work with!

Then legal would be held liable for not protecting the company.