Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
did you already do your drug test?
Yes
did you already do your drug test?
the only word in the previous post that stood out was "IF".......more than likely they'll 'extend' start date a couple weeks/months (unemployment time) with promise to call everybody back in "IF" product gets approved... nobody wants to pay for us to twiddle our thumbs for couple of months being a big Cost to these guys - client, (believe me inVentiv doesn't want to pay for your wait time at all)
Anybody hear any news today? 12/9 start date obviously isn't going to happen.
If you were on the conf call...you would know...
If you were on the conf call...you would know...
Anybody hear any news today? 12/9 start date obviously isn't going to happen.
I wasn't on the call because I haven't had my drug screen yet. Could someone please share what was said?
Start date is 1/2/2014 for home study, which will be about 7 biz days. then, a meet with your new District in a meet and then training in NJ, I think. They were pretty vague about that but it makes sense. We will sell Exalgo and Pennsaid and set the cycle and set lunches for the anticipated approval of the new drug. When it gets approved, we will go to the launch, which will prob still be in Orlando.
Lot of angst out there. Listen, I think it's gonna be OK. Just a minor glitch and then we'll have a great and interesting drug to sell.
If you were on the conf call...you would know...
Wow, what a dick!! Nothing like making a power trip out of nothing. You are a complete ASS!!!!
I attempted to ask when away training was but my request must not have gone through. I know they are waiting for launch for Orlando but I will assume we will have some away training before we hit the field. Only 7 days home-study? I didn't hear them mention training in New Jersey at all, did anyone else?
Here's what i know: Tom Bonk is a good man. I don't know any of those other people, so I can't say. He is electing to err on the side of being too informative. There are things they don't yet know so it sounds like they're holding back.
We will get the info as they get it. I believe that. This guy is an honorable man.
This is still a good gig. Hang in there or not. I have another interview tomorrow and another (zogenix) next week. I will end up with a job but this is the one I want.
Here's what i know: Tom Bonk is a good man. I don't know any of those other people, so I can't say. He is electing to err on the side of being too informative. There are things they don't yet know so it sounds like they're holding back.
We will get the info as they get it. I believe that. This guy is an honorable man.
This is still a good gig. Hang in there or not. I have another interview tomorrow and another (zogenix) next week. I will end up with a job but this is the one I want.
I'm curious why you'd want this job (one that is certain to end) over one with a actual company that really is open ended???
I has nothing to do with being a good and honorable man has nothing to do with the situation. This is the world of pharma and most importantly contract pharma. This is a 3 month extension and it makes no sense to hire 160 reps to do what 200 reps have already been doing. There's things that are not known. The company states they "want to set the groundwork...how? You can't discuss the product and you shouldn't even be talking the disease state without a product. Additionally they are mixing the the territories to bring new people in to sell 2 products for a short length of time. This completely upsets the relationships that are already there. There very little coverage for pennsaid and absolutely no samples. With exalgo , it could be gone Anytime. It is a "month to month" product so it is a waste of time to train 160 new reps on it for a short term product and realign the territories. None of this makes sense. If course it did not make sense to jump the fun and hire the Inventiv team so far in advance for an "iffy" approval. They were hanging their hat on the abuse deterrent labeling and obviously did not receive it; therefore additional dTa saw probably submitted for review.