Heard from someone that gsk will start selling this in jan. should be an interesting poa if we even have one
so, I have a few questions for you or anyone who chooses to weight in:
- what will be the marketing deal if they do and how and who within nvd will it benefit? ex - it's a cross-branding agreement where like in playing dr's as a kid, you show me yours if I show you mine. gsk can sell menveo as part of their offerings as a bundle, like sanofi, and our field sales force can also sell the gsk bundle.
- if the marketing deal in not cross-branded or reciprocal, how does it benefit our field sales force other than keep nvd alive a little longer as they execute a plan to get rid of the field sales force?
- no matter what the final marketing deal, how is this not a total capitulation to the claims for the lack of us commercial validity of menveo (lack of clear clinical superiority and ease of use - failures of Rino) and the entire almost 4 years of work and spend on RNA (Andrin, Vas. et al failures)? doesn't this mean that all these guys have to update their resumes (not only in order to look for other jobs but also to change what they are claiming as sucesses?)
- does this mean that i, as a member of the field sales force, need to look for another job as well?
- if you don't see this a poa that helps nvd while it is a challenge to the viability of the current field sales force, does that make you a marketing lackey and an nvd apologist?
- if we do, doesn't this make nvd just a vaccine development shop for other major vaccine sales orgs that is highly subsidized by novartis?
note - i no longer use the term the antiquated term vaccine solutions specialist but rather the more generic term field sales force since it has become apparent from shortly after the launch of menveo and the subsequent publishing of the future pipeline that nvd was never going to give us the portfolio to sell as a solution to any vaccination needs. ironically, if gsk gets the ability to sell menveo as part of a bundle to compete with sanofi they would then be able to credibly claim that their field sales were vss's.