The math doesn't add up? You math actually doesn't add up. Let's all learn some accounting:
EBITDA margin can provide an investor, business owner or financial professional with a clear view of a company's operating profitability and
cash flow
That's more or less the cash burn and really adjusted EBITDA is probably closer to the cash burn. $10.7 million in Q2. $56 million in cash minus $11million in Q3 & $11million in Q4= $36 million in cash. $43-$45 million in cash at the end of 2016 must assume lower expenses in Q3 &Q4 or higher sales or a combo.
Let's say they are wrong and they end up with $36 million at the end of 2016. $36 million takes them to Q417 if sales don't improve or expenses don't go down. They filed the shelf to do a 2nd offering plus have a $15million credit line in case that happens.
If sales grow from $19 million to $30 Million a quarter that gets them to profitability at the same expenses. That seems like a lot, and it is, but that's approximately an extra 55 systems in 2017. U.S. sales goes from 15 a quarter to 30 a quarter and they are cash flow positive. That math isn't that unrealistic. That also assumes path & other products are flat, which they are not currently flat. It will be a tough road but if Gen 3 works and they can sell more each quarter they might make it.
Read more:
EBITDA Margin Definition | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/ebitda-margin.asp#ixzz4GTep8Q1j
Follow us:
Investopedia on Facebook