anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
This discussion is weird. Why would an RBD post on here? Regardless, I see where you are coming from. I do hear objections about cost sometimes. but honestly a colonoscopy in a major metro area costs $3k plus, so insurance companies would rather replace 10 scopes with Cologuard saving big $$$. Even if 2-3 of those are positive, AND with a 3 year interval of Cologuard, the insurance companies still save $$. It just makes sense. I hate to break it to you but Cologuard is here to stay.
What major center has a colonoscopy cost of $3k? The most I have seen is $1900 and most insurers and medicare are down below $1200. Also the doctors are telling me the high positive rate they get from Cologuard is not saving any money on the colonocspies because more people are having them. The only money that may be saved if catching the cancer early. We don't have reliable studies on the savings. Our test is designed to drive more colonoscopies and not replace them. Cologuard is hear to stay for 2 more years, maybe 3. Other technology will replace it. I hope that technology is developed by us. $500+ tests are going to be eliminated. We need to get the test charge below $200 for the insurances and medicare to accept this test long range. Liquid biopsies may be the answer but I honestly believe we are at least 7 years away from that. In case all of us have forgotten, health care costs are still going up, not down. We need to prove our test saves money, which we cannot do at this time!