EEOC investigating more discrimination charges from Western Regional Director!

Quote
anonymous said:
Hands down the dumbest post in CP history not intended to be. Do the math and research before speaking. Novo Nordisk doesn't have many people of color working for the company. Fact. People of color are under represented in leadership. Under qualified white men are given opportunties to advance (just do a 6 rotation in house) and white women benefit most from any diversity and inclusion programs (which is all optics driven) and affirmative action. Novo Nordisk is making money and paying all of us on the backs of Afriacnan American and Hispanic population with T2 diabetes who A1c's aren't getting any better. DL and his ET team like it this way and HR is aligned, like a fox watching the hen house. Novo Nordisk US is a racist organization
Click to expand...
Truth.
 




anonymous said:
False. Been there, done that. Disparate impact is well established. What you can’t measure doesn’t count in business. Over stacking whites in leadership doesn’t prove their competence. In fact many have proven themselves incompetent based on poor performance considering the available talent pool. They are in positions a better qualified Black executive should be in. You are crying racism denial. Racism is proven as a system which must be smashed and replaced by equity and merit, not the other way around. I was at NNI when EW led Biopharm as U.S. President, crushing performance records and winning. Black executives don’t have to prove themselves-not to you. Some whites have to prove and defend why they are trying to roll back the clock to the 40s, mal-based on race, not performance. Of course physicians are noticing. Everyone knows what is going on. If Blacks are not in executive, board, and management positions, whites will stack positions with their friends or enablers. The data is the data. Benign neglect and pretending not to notice is an old white strategy (male and female). That is fine. True, the EEOC may be a paper tiger, but some of us are not. Game on. Let’s see what happens.
Click to expand...

I am a white male, however, this is the best post I have read on CP. Hands down. Hats off to you for a great written piece.
 




anonymous said:
Hands down the dumbest post in CP history not intended to be. Do the math and research before speaking. Novo Nordisk doesn't have many people of color working for the company. Fact. People of color are under represented in leadership. Under qualified white men are given opportunties to advance (just do a 6 rotation in house) and white women benefit most from any diversity and inclusion programs (which is all optics driven) and affirmative action. Novo Nordisk is making money and paying all of us on the backs of Afriacnan American and Hispanic population with T2 diabetes who A1c's aren't getting any better. DL and his ET team like it this way and HR is aligned, like a fox watching the hen house. Novo Nordisk US is a racist organization
Click to expand...

So true. I’ve been given opportunities my counterpart hasn’t and our DBM blames in on the RBD and the AVP. Apparently the AVP has had a history of being a racist but he’s still our AVP
 








anonymous said:
False. Been there, done that. Disparate impact is well established. What you can’t measure doesn’t count in business. Over stacking whites in leadership doesn’t prove their competence. In fact many have proven themselves incompetent based on poor performance considering the available talent pool. They are in positions a better qualified Black executive should be in. You are crying racism denial. Racism is proven as a system which must be smashed and replaced by equity and merit, not the other way around. I was at NNI when EW led Biopharm as U.S. President, crushing performance records and winning. Black executives don’t have to prove themselves-not to you. Some whites have to prove and defend why they are trying to roll back the clock to the 40s, mal-based on race, not performance. Of course physicians are noticing. Everyone knows what is going on. If Blacks are not in executive, board, and management positions, whites will stack positions with their friends or enablers. The data is the data. Benign neglect and pretending not to notice is an old white strategy (male and female). That is fine. True, the EEOC may be a paper tiger, but some of us are not. Game on. Let’s see what happens.
Click to expand...

I’m sure it’s very freeing when you can say whatever it is that you want without having to provide a single shred of proof, but it doesn’t make a particularly compelling party. Which white leaders have shown themselves to be incompetent and which qualified black executives were passed over when the white leaders were hired? And if you were here when Eddie was in charge of Biopharm, then you know that his illegal marketing practices around NovoSeven resulted in a massive fine and a CIA for the company, and he still got to keep his job. It was only after two full years of performance below 80% of goal that he was finally asked to leave. If that’s who you’re hanging your hat on, surely you can do better. The rest of your statement is simply more baseless claims without any evidence that this is happening at Novo Nordisk. You keep speaking of data – let’s hear some of it. Otherwise, you’re simply spouting an opinion based on nothing but your feelings.
 




anonymous said:
I’m sure it’s very freeing when you can say whatever it is that you want without having to provide a single shred of proof, but it doesn’t make a particularly compelling party. Which white leaders have shown themselves to be incompetent and which qualified black executives were passed over when the white leaders were hired? And if you were here when Eddie was in charge of Biopharm, then you know that his illegal marketing practices around NovoSeven resulted in a massive fine and a CIA for the company, and he still got to keep his job. It was only after two full years of performance below 80% of goal that he was finally asked to leave. If that’s who you’re hanging your hat on, surely you can do better. The rest of your statement is simply more baseless claims without any evidence that this is happening at Novo Nordisk. You keep speaking of data – let’s hear some of it. Otherwise, you’re simply spouting an opinion based on nothing but your feelings.
Click to expand...

like fatty liver and victoza? Happening now and Eddie's not here for that.
 




anonymous said:
I’m sure it’s very freeing when you can say whatever it is that you want without having to provide a single shred of proof, but it doesn’t make a particularly compelling party. Which white leaders have shown themselves to be incompetent and which qualified black executives were passed over when the white leaders were hired? And if you were here when Eddie was in charge of Biopharm, then you know that his illegal marketing practices around NovoSeven resulted in a massive fine and a CIA for the company, and he still got to keep his job. It was only after two full years of performance below 80% of goal that he was finally asked to leave. If that’s who you’re hanging your hat on, surely you can do better. The rest of your statement is simply more baseless claims without any evidence that this is happening at Novo Nordisk. You keep speaking of data – let’s hear some of it. Otherwise, you’re simply spouting an opinion based on nothing but your feelings.
Click to expand...

That isn't how the VP's were evaluated at the time. 80% you're such a lier. Eddie was a great leader and better than what we have now. Stop sucking butt.
 




anonymous said:
That isn't how the VP's were evaluated at the time. 80% you're such a lier. Eddie was a great leader and better than what we have now. Stop sucking butt.
Click to expand...

I agree. Eddie was a great guy, but his performance was abysmal the last 2 years. We overhauled Biopharm after he left - a lot of folks were let go.

And, how were the other VPs evaluated if not in the same way? Whose performance was just as bad, but they weren’t let go?
 




anonymous said:
I agree. Eddie was a great guy, but his performance was abysmal the last 2 years. We overhauled Biopharm after he left - a lot of folks were let go.

And, how were the other VPs evaluated if not in the same way? Whose performance was just as bad, but they weren’t let go?
Click to expand...


Dougs performance has been horrible for 4 years and the embarrassment he was when he was before congress should have showed him the exit door but it didn’t .
 












anonymous said:
Dougs performance has been horrible for 4 years and the embarrassment he was when he was before congress should have showed him the exit door but it didn’t .
Click to expand...

By what measure? We’re meeting Wall Street expectations and launch is going great. You not liking him doesn’t mean he’s not meeting his performance objectives. And, it doesn’t mean that he was promoted and retained due to the color of his skin. You’ll have to do better.

I’ve noticed that when anyone asks for evidence around these claims of racism, the claims fall apart. As stated before, just because something doesn’t go your way AND you are a minority doesn’t mean it didn’t go your way BECAUSE you are a minority.
 




anonymous said:
By what measure? We’re meeting Wall Street expectations and launch is going great. You not liking him doesn’t mean he’s not meeting his performance objectives. And, it doesn’t mean that he was promoted and retained due to the color of his skin. You’ll have to do better.

I’ve noticed that when anyone asks for evidence around these claims of racism, the claims fall apart. As stated before, just because something doesn’t go your way AND you are a minority doesn’t mean it didn’t go your way BECAUSE you are a minority.
Click to expand...

This post is proof that HR reads CP. So insecure. Watch out everyone the Fox is watching the hen house like someone else said in a previous post.
 




anonymous said:
By what measure? We’re meeting Wall Street expectations and launch is going great. You not liking him doesn’t mean he’s not meeting his performance objectives. And, it doesn’t mean that he was promoted and retained due to the color of his skin. You’ll have to do better.

I’ve noticed that when anyone asks for evidence around these claims of racism, the claims fall apart. As stated before, just because something doesn’t go your way AND you are a minority doesn’t mean it didn’t go your way BECAUSE you are a minority.
Click to expand...

BS Doug has blamed market headwinds and every other excuse for not performing. Boss keeps him in place to not look bad. New product launch was going to happen regardless of him and he embarrassed Novo before Congress. Novo hasn’t been impressive on wall street and the company’s moral has been low the past 4 years or so. Top shelf reps and good product keep the company achieving Dougs tactics make achieving more difficult. Makes us wish how good we would be doing with better leadership at the very top.
 








anonymous said:
BS Doug has blamed market headwinds and every other excuse for not performing. Boss keeps him in place to not look bad. New product launch was going to happen regardless of him and he embarrassed Novo before Congress. Novo hasn’t been impressive on wall street and the company’s moral has been low the past 4 years or so. Top shelf reps and good product keep the company achieving Dougs tactics make achieving more difficult. Makes us wish how good we would be doing with better leadership at the very top.
Click to expand...

This is just more meaningless talk. Where is your evidence that the boss keeps him in place so that he doesn’t look bad? Where is your proof that the launch was going to go well regardless of leadership. You’re continuing to make claims that are based off nothing more than your dislike of Doug. And, this has obviously moved away from the whole line of racism complaints before. It’s as if one thing you make baseless claims about is simply replaced by another....
 




anonymous said:
This post is proof that HR reads CP. So insecure. Watch out everyone the Fox is watching the hen house like someone else said in a previous post.
Click to expand...

This is boring. You don’t like what I say, so you claim I am HR. I’m not HR. Once again, you’re trying to say something with no evidence that it’s true. And, regardless of which department I work in, find fault with my argument as opposed to trying to discredit the source. If you can’t fault my argument, I could be from the moon. It doesn’t matter. My point is still valid.
 




anonymous said:
This is boring. You don’t like what I say, so you claim I am HR. I’m not HR. Once again, you’re trying to say something with no evidence that it’s true. And, regardless of which department I work in, find fault with my argument as opposed to trying to discredit the source. If you can’t fault my argument, I could be from the moon. It doesn’t matter. My point is still valid.
Click to expand...

Company demographic data is proof. Look it up.
 








anonymous said:
Back to inequality of outcomes, are we? That’s not racism, just as a prison system dominated by males isn’t sexism. You’ll have to do better.
Click to expand...

equality of opportunity should be your focus HR and if Novo Nordisk is an Equal Opportunity Employer under the law you would know that legally the equality of outcome argument is bunk. One person challenged you to look at company demographics. Ask for a refund on that PhD
 




Top Bottom
Back
Quote