Dear Patty...

Quote






anonymous said:
Patty was let go from her previous several hires. I I completely understand why she was let go...she is incompetent.
Click to expand...
Those companies that let her go are smart for not tolerating her incompetence. Opko, on the other hand, is just as incompetent for knowingly tolerating her incompetence. Meanwhile, we’re screwed.
 






anonymous said:
Those companies that let her go are smart for not tolerating her incompetence. Opko, on the other hand, is just as incompetent for knowingly tolerating her incompetence. Meanwhile, we’re screwed.
Click to expand...
The real problem is the cheapskate on the top floor. I swear he has figured out a way to take it to the grave. He can’t handle someone who tells him he doesn’t know what he is talking about. In the meantime he is making another fortune as the short squeeze is underway.
 






anonymous said:
The real problem is the cheapskate on the top floor. I swear he has figured out a way to take it to the grave. He can’t handle someone who tells him he doesn’t know what he is talking about. In the meantime he is making another fortune as the short squeeze is underway.
Click to expand...
Stock could hit over $6.50 by Q4 earnings report in Feb. Happy Valentines Day! And if he sells the company stock could hit $10. Maybe now he will have enough money to retire.
 












Dear Patty,

Riddle me this:

You have 2 reps, A and B. Both have a quarter goal of, let's say, 200 TRXs.

Rep A gets prescribers to write 250 Rayaldee scripts. However, 100 of those go to PAP for a net % to goal (250-100=150/200) of 75%. Rep A gets no IC payout.
Rep B gets prescribers to write 200 Rayaldee scripts. Because of commercial, Medicaid, and LIS density, only 25 go to PAP for a net % to goal (200-25=175/200) of 88%. Rep B gets 88% IC payout.

Who is the better rep?
 






anonymous said:
Dear Patty,

Riddle me this:

You have 2 reps, A and B. Both have a quarter goal of, let's say, 200 TRXs.

Rep A gets prescribers to write 250 Rayaldee scripts. However, 100 of those go to PAP for a net % to goal (250-100=150/200) of 75%. Rep A gets no IC payout.
Rep B gets prescribers to write 200 Rayaldee scripts. Because of commercial, Medicaid, and LIS density, only 25 go to PAP for a net % to goal (200-25=175/200) of 88%. Rep B gets 88% IC payout.

Who is the better rep?
Click to expand...

The question is: Patty do you understand the math?
 






anonymous said:
Dear Patty,

Riddle me this:

You have 2 reps, A and B. Both have a quarter goal of, let's say, 200 TRXs.

Rep A gets prescribers to write 250 Rayaldee scripts. However, 100 of those go to PAP for a net % to goal (250-100=150/200) of 75%. Rep A gets no IC payout.
Rep B gets prescribers to write 200 Rayaldee scripts. Because of commercial, Medicaid, and LIS density, only 25 go to PAP for a net % to goal (200-25=175/200) of 88%. Rep B gets 88% IC payout.

Who is the better rep?
Click to expand...

Your riddle is quite simple. Clearly you don't understand how businesses work, by making a profit. Rep A didn't bring in as much revenue to the company. 175 versus 150. Are you really this dumb?
 












anonymous said:
Dear Patty,

Riddle me this:

You have 2 reps, A and B. Both have a quarter goal of, let's say, 200 TRXs.

Rep A gets prescribers to write 250 Rayaldee scripts. However, 100 of those go to PAP for a net % to goal (250-100=150/200) of 75%. Rep A gets no IC payout.
Rep B gets prescribers to write 200 Rayaldee scripts. Because of commercial, Medicaid, and LIS density, only 25 go to PAP for a net % to goal (200-25=175/200) of 88%. Rep B gets 88% IC payout.

Who is the better rep?
Click to expand...
Who is the better rep?!?! A rep who brings in 150 or 175 in an entire quarter is NOT a good rep. No more excuses.
 






anonymous said:
Who is the better rep?!?! A rep who brings in 150 or 175 in an entire quarter is NOT a good rep. No more excuses.
Click to expand...

It is still a moot point: not which is the better representative; but where the profitability will come from.
Patty has not executed or begun to implement any real business plans
Some of us have received calls from the RSM’s....we are on Patty’s hit list. Oh, this will be interesting? Fun? and Exciting? Come on, Patty!!!! Really????
 






anonymous said:
It is still a moot point: not which is the better representative; but where the profitability will come from.
Patty has not executed or begun to implement any real business plans
Some of us have received calls from the RSM’s....we are on Patty’s hit list. Oh, this will be interesting? Fun? and Exciting? Come on, Patty!!!! Really????
Click to expand...
The empress has no clothes (plans). If she did she wouldn’t resort to going to the field for advice on how to sell Rayaldee without foundation money and without PAP.
 




































anonymous said:
Dear Patty,

You’re incompetent and clueless!!!
Click to expand...


Patty is clueless, has been and will always be clueless. She is merely a scape goat for Charlie. He has been trying like hell to sell this crap to Vifor. Patty is only here in body.
And a big fat one to say the least. Anyhow, she doesn’t have a prayer. She can not lead a team and has the most incompetent puppets for RSM’s. What strategies or sales practices have they added? Oh- Socrates Selling- but this was not structured for Socrates Selling in a Pandemic with no 501c3. I rest my case. She should be put out with the trash.
 






anonymous said:
Patty is clueless, has been and will always be clueless. She is merely a scape goat for Charlie. He has been trying like hell to sell this crap to Vifor. Patty is only here in body.
And a big fat one to say the least. Anyhow, she doesn’t have a prayer. She can not lead a team and has the most incompetent puppets for RSM’s. What strategies or sales practices have they added? Oh- Socrates Selling- but this was not structured for Socrates Selling in a Pandemic with no 501c3. I rest my case. She should be put out with the trash.
Click to expand...
Wow, I guess she won’t be receiving a Christmas card from you this year.
 












Top Bottom
Back
Quote