Creationism's Top 10

You don't know that because GOD is beyond your ability to analyze and observe.

We can observe the physical universe and examine how it works and based upon that we know that elements don't organize themselves.

This is a loser logically and philosophically for you but I'm sure you'll continue to embarrass yourself with dime store theology. LOL!

The 2000 year old concept of 'god' is beyond most anyone's ability to observe - people today are smarter than that, seek a better explanation.

Is there an underlying purpose? Many still wonder.

Is there a guy in the sky with flowing robes who writes down every time you get a BJ and who gave it to you? Most people doubt this........
 




The 2000 year old concept of 'god' is beyond most anyone's ability to observe - people today are smarter than that, seek a better explanation.

Is there an underlying purpose? Many still wonder.

Is there a guy in the sky with flowing robes who writes down every time you get a BJ and who gave it to you? Most people doubt this........

Actually, most people don't.

And you don't come off as progressive or intelligent with posts like this.

You come off looking shallow and foolish.
 




The 2000 year old concept of 'god' is beyond most anyone's ability to observe - people today are smarter than that, seek a better explanation.

Is there an underlying purpose? Many still wonder.

Is there a guy in the sky with flowing robes who writes down every time you get a BJ and who gave it to you? Most people doubt this........

The notion that religious beliefs can be 'proved' by science is where Creationists go off the track. Also, the strength with which personal beliefs are held is not a measure of their 'rightness'. Nobody will convince me of their religious viewpoint by arguing their case on the basis of ignorance of science, or by perpetuating the lies and distortions in the field of creation 'science'.
 




The notion that religious beliefs can be 'proved' by science is where Creationists go off the track. Also, the strength with which personal beliefs are held is not a measure of their 'rightness'. Nobody will convince me of their religious viewpoint by arguing their case on the basis of ignorance of science, or by perpetuating the lies and distortions in the field of creation 'science'.

Depends upon what you mean by "religious beliefs" and what you are putting forward isn't on the table, so Creationists have by no means "gone off track".

It's evolutionists who have gone off track with their atheist presuppositions and rejection of logic and evidence. It is evolutionists who are ignorant and intentionally blind to the facts. It is evolutionists who have put forth lies and distortions. This is documented fact, not my opinion.

What we have is essentially a clash of two belief systems, not between a belief system and science. I know that chaps you, but the truth often has that effect on you.
 




What we have is essentially a clash of two belief systems, not between a belief system and science. I know that chaps you, but the truth often has that effect on you.

Your so called truth is just your opinion.

As I have said, the strength with which your personal beliefs are held is not a measure of their 'rightness'.
 




Your so called truth is just your opinion.

As I have said, the strength with which your personal beliefs are held is not a measure of their 'rightness'.

I never stated that they were. Once again you knock down straw men and then think you've done something. Usually all you do is deflect, dodge and deny.

The topic at hand involves which belief system has the most evidence and logic to support it: creation or blind evolution.

The fact is that the majority of people believe in creationism. The fact is that creationism has much more to recommend it. The fact is that evolutionary theory has several major problems. Those are the facts. Regardless of the strength with which you hold YOUR PERSONAL BELIEFS.