anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Sure beats “slamming in LAAOs”
Point is there simply is no case or I think they would have done something.
Sure beats “slamming in LAAOs”
Point is there simply is no case or I think they would have done something.
Sure beats “slamming in LAAOs”
This might go down as the dumbest reply of all.
1. "No case" - Abbott filed suit
2. "Would have done something" - see point #1
Try to keep up. There is no case against the three reps. That was what was being discussed.
well did the three reps resign before they signed a contract? Did the three reps access the contracts for their accounts while working for two companies?
just asking. Maybe that’s why they haven’t been sued………. Yet.
But I thought it was all about the patients?
well did the three reps resign before they signed a contract? Did the three reps access the contracts for their accounts while working for two companies?
just asking. Maybe that’s why they haven’t been sued………. Yet.
Patients + contracts = money aka what it’s all about.
I fixed it for you.
Did they ask JP to do this on there behalf? If so, that’s not good.
What do you care?
“Their behalf”
You were already taken to school on your grammar troll. ( or should it be Troll?)
The I fixed it guy came back with a vengeance because you opened the door.
grammar guy is coming for you again I’m certain.
why DO you care ? & how bout goin away.
Sure beats “slamming in LAAOs”
Going back to slammin’ in LAAOs and posting about it on social! That’s what we do here!
The Abbott Occluder crew loves hating on EP and CRM reps.
These losers couldn’t get into CRM when it was a million a year job and are so bitter…
Where are you now? still “slamming in” pacers and wishing you could get hired as a LAAO rep?